Jack or Nick Riewoldt??

Jack or Nick Riewoldt?


  • Total voters
    356

Remove this Banner Ad

Socrates2

Norm Smith Medallist
Aug 11, 2015
9,041
9,791
AFL Club
Richmond
JACK RIEWOLDT
Height 193 cm (6 ft 4 in)
Weight 92 kg (203 lb)
Position(s)Full forward / CHForward
Richmond
Games 249
Goals 607
Career highlights

NICK RIEWOLDT
Height 193 cm (6 ft 4 in)
Weight 92 kg (203 lb)
Position(s)Forward
Playing career 2001–2017
St Kilda
Games 336,
Goals 718
Career highlights
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
This is not going to go well.

The Richmond haters will set the tone of this and it'll be in the bay pretty quickly.
I don't know, they are pretty close over their careers now and the bigfooty punters can be even-handed with a good topic.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

JACK RIEWOLDT
Height 193 cm (6 ft 4 in)
Weight 92 kg (203 lb)
Position(s)Full forward / CHForward
Richmond
Games 249
Goals 607
Career highlights

NICK RIEWOLDT
Height 193 cm (6 ft 4 in)
Weight 92 kg (203 lb)
Position(s)Forward
Playing career 2001–2017
St Kilda
Games 336,
Goals 718
Career highlights
It's the AFLX premiership that tips the scale for me.

Interesting how closely they're tracking though.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
It's interesting they are the same height and weight.Jack has a better leap and is a better pack mark, whilst Nick had incredible endurance and was a great mark on a lead.Incidently, Nick was retired two years too early in my opinion.
 
Not a bad question. Interesting. Slightly different roles but same position................................ and interesting careers in Nick was successful but never got the flag vs Jack who struggled through then boom last 2 years

But I'm going with Nick every day of the week. Simply the better player

So Jack's first 2 Coleman medals were when he was struggling?
Fair effort that.
 
Fair to say in 2010 Richmond were struggling a wee bit.

Dude, you saying Angus Graham and Luke McGuane weren’t much chop? You’re joking......


Sent from my iPad using righteous Bhodi manpower
 
This is not going to go well.

The Richmond haters will set the tone of this and it'll be in the bay pretty quickly.

Does thinking Nick is the better of the two make you a Richmond hater?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

This is not going to go well.

The Richmond haters will set the tone of this and it'll be in the bay pretty quickly.
And here you are as usual. Woe is me.
 
Hardly.

It will end quickly because Nick is the easy choice of the two.

Both have been great. Nick has been better.

I reckon both players are on par with each other. Both highly decorated, talented footballers who have both achieved some of the same accolades and awards and some others different from each other. And one played as a CHF while the other played at FF. So different roles for their respective teams.


Sent from my iPad using righteous Bhodi manpower
 
This is not going to go well.
The Richmond haters will set the tone of this and it'll be in the bay pretty quickly.
Ridiculous! Nobody cares that much about Richmond coz they will be lead by Dusty to fall on their sword just like what Dane done to the Pies!
Jack is the obvious choice! He's a reliable forward that makes the most of his opportunities whereas Nick was wasteful in front of goal!
 
Handy role players. Think Mark Seaby. But you missed my point.

No, i was taking the piss, of course we were struggling in 2010.


Sent from my iPad using righteous Bhodi manpower
 
Jack still has about three seasons left.
Jack will end on about 30 games less than Nick and Jack will finish about 70 goals in front of Nick.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Jack or Nick Riewoldt??

Back
Top