Jack Ziebell - Centre Half Forward?

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
If we didnt have other options sure, but there are plenty with more to emerge in the next couple of years.

To have a guy 6'3" capable of playing midfield is much more valuable because his impact is all over the ground, and with his kicking ability we want the ball in his hands as much as possible.
 
If we didnt have other options sure, but there are plenty with more to emerge in the next couple of years.

To have a guy 6'3" capable of playing midfield is much more valuable because his impact is all over the ground, and with his kicking ability we want the ball in his hands as much as possible.

Which is better, the ball in his hands in the midfield, or the ball in his hands within 60 metres of goal?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

He reminds me so much of Nathan Buckley. So jealous you guys got him. Yes he could play at CHF and probably dominate. We know he isnt going to back out of a contest and strong mark great kick. Yes i can see him doing it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Listen chump, some of us actually have a go at speculating about footballers.

Any ****wit (i.e. you) can toss up a bunch of stats after the fact.

Which is something you have done a fair bit lately to justify your opinions re: Rawlings and Leigh Adams.
 
Yeah, well we can't all be brave speculators like you:
Brilliant, insightful stuff.:thumbsu:
Theres brave and theres downright stupid. You actually believe Ziebell would average an assist every 2 possesions gained inside 60m of goal.

:eek:

I suppose you think long bombs to 190cm Ziebell are the go too. WoW his 10 games have sure made an impression.
 
Interesting suggestion from left field.

I would prefer Jack to develop as a footballer in the midfield and maybe off a flank whether forward or back.
 
Theres brave and theres downright stupid. You actually believe Ziebell would average an assist every 2 possesions gained inside 60m of goal.

:eek:

6/15 is now 50%?

Got any land to sell me?

I suppose you think long bombs to 190cm Ziebell are the go too. WoW his 10 games have sure made an impression.

Hey, my opinions are on record smartarse.

I suggest you grow some balls and do the same thing instead of sitting back and shitcanning everyone elses opinion.:thumbsu:
 
The difference between me and you is it's not all I do you ****ing tosspot.

Go do something productive like smoke a Steyr.:thumbsu:

No, you also chuck a tantrum either year, have a sook and come back with a new username.

If you don't like someone asking you to explain your opinion on here then why do you post?
 
No, you also chuck a tantrum either year, have a sook and come back with a new username.

Hahahahaha

I love this egoistic username mentality.

Do you hold on to "DarwinRoo" because you think it is some pillar of strength and wisdom?

How is that anxiety going by the way?

It's always a little better when there is a stupid clown around to exercise it on. Thanks.
 
Is there any proof that Ziebell would win the ball 15 times a game at CHF? I agree with Q's earlier assessment, but think Z could be handy in stints up forward (much like Cunnington).
 
Is there any proof that Ziebell would win the ball 15 times a game at CHF?

Not yet, but when he gets 50/60 games under his belt and gets his weight up around 95 kg then I see no reason why he couldn't based on what I have seen.
 
6/15 is now 50%?
Got any land to sell me?
Hey, my opinions are on record smartarse.
I suggest you grow some balls and do the same thing instead of sitting back and shitcanning everyone elses opinion.:thumbsu:
LMAO you get your knickers in a knot because someone has a different opinion than you, then go all emo and say Im shit canning you because you pull a bunch of figures out of your ass.

Highly entertaining :thumbsu::thumbsu:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top