Correct me if im wrong but it doesnt actually say he has been delisted. Which would mean that Adelaide are willing to trade him during trade week? Or does this mean they are going to cut/delist him beforehand? I guess if WC offered pick #99 the crows would simply take it...
-
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Round SF Winner: And_ROOS
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Jacky delisted
- Thread starter KingJames23
- Start date
- Tagged users None
NTRabbit
Brownlow Medallist
No player is officially delisted until list lodgement 1, which is 3 weeks after trade week. In theory any player whose delisting has already been announced can still be traded for - however, players announced this early tend to be the ones with no trade value anyway, and an early cut gives those who wish to ample time to sort themselves out and nominate for main, pre-season and rookie drafts.
- Moderator
- #54
Due to Doughty being the only veteran on our list I am 99% sure that we will be able to automatically upgrade 1 rookie to the senior list next season. With that being the case I would be surprised if we upgraded Jaensch because we basically can keep him as a rookie, but still be able to use him from the start of the year as a player on our main list.
Correct
They're called a "nominated rookie". To all intents and purposes they are a senior listed player, but they still occupy a position on the rookie list. It's sort of like they're a rookie listed player who has been elevated without the need for a senior listed player going onto the LTI list.
I agree that there's a distinct possibility that Jaensch may remain on the rookie list, as our "nominated rookie" in 2011. It all depends on how many players we lose and gain during trade week and how many selections we want to have in the ND.
And do we pay him the rookie wages (which is sweet **** all) or does he get normal wages if he is the nominated rookie?!
Whats in it for Jeansh to stay on the rookie list?! If we don't promote him I am pretty sure there would be an AFL team that would offer him a spot on the senior list if he went into the ND or the PSD.
We all seem to be looking at the best case scenario from club's perspective but the player has a say in this as well. Jeansh has shown that he is very capable of playing AFL football so why would he agree to remain on the rookie list and get paid as a rookie when he is good enough to be a regular 22 next year?
The following is taken from the Collective Bargaining Agreement:
If he gets a better offer then he should take it, but as a "nominated rookie" he's not on rookie list wages any more.
The only real difference is that a senior listed player occupies a position on the senior list, the "nominated rookie" occupies a position on the rookie list.
We would still have to upgrade him to the senior list at the end of 2011.
Looking forward to list management at the end of 2011, I'm not sure that this is advisable. We've had a LOT of players leaving this year through retirement (plus one defection). We've only delisted one player - and that's unlikely to increase further.
Doughty is probably the only likely retiree in 2011 and his departure won't free up a senior list position because he's now on our veteran list and we won't have any eligible replacements. This means that any further list changes will be the result of trading and/or delisting.
Obviously it's very difficult to forecast which players would be likely to be delisted 12 months ahead of time, though we can easily identify some for whom 2011 will be a decision making season (Stevens, Sellar, Moran, Petrenko, Cook and Armstrong all spring to mind). It's even harder to predict who might be traded in or out 12 months ahead.
At the end of the day though, I would suggest that our list turnover next year will be considerably less than that experienced in 2010, thus we probably won't be looking to upgrade too many rookies.
We would still have to upgrade him to the senior list at the end of 2011.
Looking forward to list management at the end of 2011, I'm not sure that this is advisable. We've had a LOT of players leaving this year through retirement (plus one defection). We've only delisted one player - and that's unlikely to increase further.
Doughty is probably the only likely retiree in 2011 and his departure won't free up a senior list position because he's now on our veteran list and we won't have any eligible replacements. This means that any further list changes will be the result of trading and/or delisting.
Obviously it's very difficult to forecast which players would be likely to be delisted 12 months ahead of time, though we can easily identify some for whom 2011 will be a decision making season (Stevens, Sellar, Moran, Petrenko, Cook and Armstrong all spring to mind). It's even harder to predict who might be traded in or out 12 months ahead.
At the end of the day though, I would suggest that our list turnover next year will be considerably less than that experienced in 2010, thus we probably won't be looking to upgrade too many rookies.
About a week ago Harper said there will 0-2 delistings depending on trades. So maximum one more delisting.
IMO who we delist may come down to list balance and this will be largely influenced by who we land in the trade...
If we land Jacobs than Sellar could be at risk if he is not traded
If we land an outside mid or two then I can see Cook struggling to hold his spot on the list
Finally, if we were able to recruit a L Thomas or Campbell than Petrenko may come under some notice
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 84,518
- 88,556
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
I seriously doubt Sellar would be delisted unless he has a Fevola-like off-field incident.
Petrenko is not going to get delisted. He is playing out of position and has alot of upside down back and occassional midfield gigs. He is a tryer and agressive. Love him.
Armstrong delisted? No he is very handy as a running back/wing type player.
Why are people keen to delist these players when we have lost mcleod and Jacky??
If any player is going to get delisted it would be Cook
Armstrong delisted? No he is very handy as a running back/wing type player.
Why are people keen to delist these players when we have lost mcleod and Jacky??
If any player is going to get delisted it would be Cook
Mackay train12
Senior List
Agreed with all of this, Petrenks could become a very good back pocket/ half bank flanker and shouldn't be used as a small forward. Hes also got more passion, guts, determination and spirit than most in our team.
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 79,359
- 160,505
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Moderator
- #66
I don't think Craig sees him as a defender.
In the AFC world, Petrenko's defensive qualities mean that he's a perfect small forward. Can't kick a goal but that doesn't matter. We like defenders who attack and forwards who defend.
swanfan
Norm Smith Medallist
It wouldn't surprise me at all if we did start playing him in defence next season though, with McLeod no longer available to play that role.
I'll bet he gets a go in defence during the preseason cup, and if he shines then, he'll play there in 2011.
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 79,359
- 160,505
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Moderator
- #70
Would love to see that.
- Mar 20, 2004
- 4,280
- 3,031
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- South Adelaide, Kenilworth
i'll believe it when i see it....... he'll probably try him at FF or some obscure place first 
i'll believe it when i see it....... he'll probably try him at FF or some obscure place first
With Griff leaving he may well play 2 or 3 games in the ruck then get dropped for not having an impact.
Agree Stabby. If petrenko shines in the back pocket..he is likely to play a defensive role like mcleod without i guess the same offensive flair forays (who knows though).
Would love to see alot more of Petrenko thats for sure. Love his work and hope he can improve.
Would love to see alot more of Petrenko thats for sure. Love his work and hope he can improve.
Southerntakeover
Too Sweet
People should pay more attention to BnF voting...
Pets voted very very well during the first half or so of the season.
The coaches rate him. He wont be delisted.
Pets voted very very well during the first half or so of the season.
The coaches rate him. He wont be delisted.
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 79,359
- 160,505
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Moderator
- #75
^
Just before he got dropped?
Nah... agree that his spot isn't in danger. In fact, with all the senior players retiring and other players moving on to other clubs you'd have to absolutely HOPELESS to get delisted this year.
Just before he got dropped?
Nah... agree that his spot isn't in danger. In fact, with all the senior players retiring and other players moving on to other clubs you'd have to absolutely HOPELESS to get delisted this year.
