so GC will take an inferior offer from Hawthorn over a better offer from other clubs... why?
Who is offering something better ??
Essendon, with their PSD threat :/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
so GC will take an inferior offer from Hawthorn over a better offer from other clubs... why?
Is he contracted or not ? What's the bloody difference if the club has so much say in who goes where? Aflpa might wanna start earning their money. Yes, that's right, Hawthorn aren't going to just going to sit around and take this 'as it comes'. If Jaeger picks the hawks then watch this space.so GC will take an inferior offer from Hawthorn over a better offer from other clubs... why?
I'm confusedIs he contracted or not ? What's the bloody difference if the club has so much say in who goes where? Aflpa might wanna start earning their money. Yes, that's right, Hawthorn aren't going to just going to sit around and take this 'as it comes'. If Jaeger picks the hawks then watch this space.
Because he chose Hawthorn perhaps?so GC will take an inferior offer from Hawthorn over a better offer from other clubs... why?
Who is offering something better ??
Essendon, with their PSD threat :/
Why? My question is what's the difference between a player that's contracted and wants to leave or uncontracted and wants to leave? On both occasions the clubs still seem to be holding the cards. I thought it was pretty simple op actually.I'm confused
no shit. But once again that just completely skims the surface of the topic. Why would he only want to go to Hawthorn? If Hawthorn can't make it happen, but another Melbourne club can, why can NO-ONE give a remotely credible answer as to why this kid would have his heart set on getting only to Hawthorn? Why is he "digging in his heals(sic)"?O'Meara would have to agree to go to another club. They can certainly endeavour to manipulate/encourage/pressure him to go to a club that they would prefer to deal with, but ultimately if he digs his heals in and doesn't agree they will be in a situation where they have to accept the best possible offer from the club of his choosing, or let him walk into the draft and accept nothing in return. They don't have the power to send him wherever they want
ok, I see. He chose Hawthorn because he chose Hawthorn and he won't ever go anywhere else because he chose Hawthorn because he chose Hawthorn.Because he chose Hawthorn perhaps?
no once can offer anything better yet, due to the fact that the trade week hasn't even started.Who is offering something better ??
Essendon, with their PSD threat :/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who is offering something better ??
Essendon, with their PSD threat :/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ok, I see. He chose Hawthorn because he chose Hawthorn and he won't ever go anywhere else because he chose Hawthorn because he chose Hawthorn.
Gotcha.
Shit, bad luck Gold Coast. Tough luck if you find a better deal with another Melbourne-based club who can offer him anything Hawthorn can. You're screwed, because he chose Hawthorn for the reason that he chose Hawthorn. No chance he'll change his mind because Hawthorn
jesus h, you serious?Is he contracted or not ? What's the bloody difference if the club has so much say in who goes where? Aflpa might wanna start earning their money. Yes, that's right, Hawthorn aren't going to just going to sit around and take this 'as it comes'. If Jaeger picks the hawks then watch this space.
you must be new to the thread. Why don't you try and catch up a little before expecting people to repeat themselves. It's all there. Just go back a page or 20. Happy readingYou must be new to this trading caper, the player decides what's best for him, and he gets to his desired location the vast majority of the time.
You almost make it sound like he's contracted lol.you must be new to the thread. Why don't you try and catch up a little before expecting people to repeat themselves. It's all there. Just go back a page or 20. Happy reading
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/jaeger-omeara.1122920/page-134#post-46480580You almost make it sound like he's contracted lol.
Just realised your username is perfect for Ty Vickery, Hawthorn.Is he contracted or not ? What's the bloody difference if the club has so much say in who goes where? Aflpa might wanna start earning their money. Yes, that's right, Hawthorn aren't going to just going to sit around and take this 'as it comes'. If Jaeger picks the hawks then watch this space.
No understanding of my point at all mate. I knew all that anyway. My point is that how ridiculous the ruling is. So much for AFLPA pushing for more player power. Hard to understand?jesus h, you serious?
Here you go. Trading 101:
A contracted player cannot choose to leave but must be traded. Because he is contracted he has no other mechanism to leave other than a trade. Therefore, as per any trade, all parties must agree, but if the one party such as the club doesn't agree then the player does not have any other option other than to either play for his contracted club or to sit out for 2 years.
An uncontracted player can choose to leave, and unlike a contracted player has 2 options. He can be traded to a 3rd party suitable to club and player, or if he wishes because his contract has expired he can move clubs via the National Draft or the Pre Season draft. Like with a contracted player, a trade requires the approval of all 3 parties, being the player, the club he's leaving, and the club he's moving to. If either party doesn't agree, there is no deal. If there is no deal, the player has only one option to move clubs, that being to nominate for the draft.
Does that help?
Are you some people?Hawthorn supporters still think they will get a first rounder for Hill? oh god, some people are bound to be disappointed.
no once can offer anything better yet, due to the fact that the trade week hasn't even started.
If you bother to even put in a vague effort of comprehension you'll pick up the thread of the conversation. Drop another line when you're up to speed
They don't. But what club will. Not can. Offer more then Hawks?so GC will take an inferior offer from Hawthorn over a better offer from other clubs... why?
how is it ridiculous? It's not a "ruling", it's a legal contract, and you appear to be proposing that one party to a contract should have less rights than the other two parties. Now that really is ridiculous.No understanding of my point at all mate. I knew all that anyway. My point is that how ridiculous the ruling is. So much for AFLPA pushing for more player power. Hard to understand?
Harley Balic? Had a wrist injury that by all accounts has been fixed. Possibly playing in WAFL finals.His foot is stuffed. Multiple clubs had him off their board. Sheridan was the name i heard thrown up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"my footy brain"."If you bother" to use your footy brain you might be able to suggest a single possible trade. Not one has been posted after thousands of posts, so hawks have every reason to be confident. When your done hurling insulting insinuations you might be able to contribute
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk