Traded Jaeger O'Meara [traded to Hawthorn for pick 10 and GWS's 2017 2nd rd pick]

Remove this Banner Ad

so GC will take an inferior offer from Hawthorn over a better offer from other clubs... why?
Is he contracted or not ? What's the bloody difference if the club has so much say in who goes where? Aflpa might wanna start earning their money. Yes, that's right, Hawthorn aren't going to just going to sit around and take this 'as it comes'. If Jaeger picks the hawks then watch this space.
 
Is he contracted or not ? What's the bloody difference if the club has so much say in who goes where? Aflpa might wanna start earning their money. Yes, that's right, Hawthorn aren't going to just going to sit around and take this 'as it comes'. If Jaeger picks the hawks then watch this space.
I'm confused
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I'm confused
Why? My question is what's the difference between a player that's contracted and wants to leave or uncontracted and wants to leave? On both occasions the clubs still seem to be holding the cards. I thought it was pretty simple op actually.
 
O'Meara would have to agree to go to another club. They can certainly endeavour to manipulate/encourage/pressure him to go to a club that they would prefer to deal with, but ultimately if he digs his heals in and doesn't agree they will be in a situation where they have to accept the best possible offer from the club of his choosing, or let him walk into the draft and accept nothing in return. They don't have the power to send him wherever they want
no shit. But once again that just completely skims the surface of the topic. Why would he only want to go to Hawthorn? If Hawthorn can't make it happen, but another Melbourne club can, why can NO-ONE give a remotely credible answer as to why this kid would have his heart set on getting only to Hawthorn? Why is he "digging in his heals(sic)"?

Maybe you can answer me the question, since Abasi doesn't appear to want to.

If O'Meara is so set on the one club, whoever that may be, then why is he allegedly touring the facilities of multiple clubs?
 
Because he chose Hawthorn perhaps?
ok, I see. He chose Hawthorn because he chose Hawthorn and he won't ever go anywhere else because he chose Hawthorn because he chose Hawthorn.

Gotcha.

Shit, bad luck Gold Coast. Tough luck if you find a better deal with another Melbourne-based club who can offer him anything Hawthorn can. You're screwed, because he chose Hawthorn for the reason that he chose Hawthorn. No chance he'll change his mind because Hawthorn
 
Who is offering something better ??

Essendon, with their PSD threat :/

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
no once can offer anything better yet, due to the fact that the trade week hasn't even started.

If you bother to even put in a vague effort of comprehension you'll pick up the thread of the conversation. Drop another line when you're up to speed
 
Who is offering something better ??

Essendon, with their PSD threat :/

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There is none.

The only real thing the PSD is going to do for us is guarantee he is ours if he nominates us. Simple. If he did nominate, we'd still try to trade. Not just simply walk him cos we can.
 
ok, I see. He chose Hawthorn because he chose Hawthorn and he won't ever go anywhere else because he chose Hawthorn because he chose Hawthorn.

Gotcha.

Shit, bad luck Gold Coast. Tough luck if you find a better deal with another Melbourne-based club who can offer him anything Hawthorn can. You're screwed, because he chose Hawthorn for the reason that he chose Hawthorn. No chance he'll change his mind because Hawthorn

You must be new to this trading caper, the player decides what's best for him, and he gets to his desired location the vast majority of the time.
 
Is he contracted or not ? What's the bloody difference if the club has so much say in who goes where? Aflpa might wanna start earning their money. Yes, that's right, Hawthorn aren't going to just going to sit around and take this 'as it comes'. If Jaeger picks the hawks then watch this space.
jesus h, you serious?

Here you go. Trading 101:

A contracted player cannot choose to leave but must be traded. Because he is contracted he has no other mechanism to leave other than a trade. Therefore, as per any trade, all parties must agree, but if the one party such as the club doesn't agree then the player does not have any other option other than to either play for his contracted club or to sit out for 2 years.

An uncontracted player can choose to leave, and unlike a contracted player has 2 options. He can be traded to a 3rd party suitable to club and player, or if he wishes because his contract has expired he can move clubs via the National Draft or the Pre Season draft. Like with a contracted player, a trade requires the approval of all 3 parties, being the player, the club he's leaving, and the club he's moving to. If either party doesn't agree, there is no deal. If there is no deal, the player has only one option to move clubs, that being to nominate for the draft.

Does that help?
 
Last edited:
You must be new to this trading caper, the player decides what's best for him, and he gets to his desired location the vast majority of the time.
you must be new to the thread. Why don't you try and catch up a little before expecting people to repeat themselves. It's all there. Just go back a page or 20. Happy reading
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Is he contracted or not ? What's the bloody difference if the club has so much say in who goes where? Aflpa might wanna start earning their money. Yes, that's right, Hawthorn aren't going to just going to sit around and take this 'as it comes'. If Jaeger picks the hawks then watch this space.
Just realised your username is perfect for Ty Vickery, Hawthorn.
 
jesus h, you serious?

Here you go. Trading 101:

A contracted player cannot choose to leave but must be traded. Because he is contracted he has no other mechanism to leave other than a trade. Therefore, as per any trade, all parties must agree, but if the one party such as the club doesn't agree then the player does not have any other option other than to either play for his contracted club or to sit out for 2 years.

An uncontracted player can choose to leave, and unlike a contracted player has 2 options. He can be traded to a 3rd party suitable to club and player, or if he wishes because his contract has expired he can move clubs via the National Draft or the Pre Season draft. Like with a contracted player, a trade requires the approval of all 3 parties, being the player, the club he's leaving, and the club he's moving to. If either party doesn't agree, there is no deal. If there is no deal, the player has only one option to move clubs, that being to nominate for the draft.

Does that help?
No understanding of my point at all mate. I knew all that anyway. My point is that how ridiculous the ruling is. So much for AFLPA pushing for more player power. Hard to understand?
 
Hawthorn supporters still think they will get a first rounder for Hill? oh god, some people are bound to be disappointed.
Are you some people?

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk
 
no once can offer anything better yet, due to the fact that the trade week hasn't even started.

If you bother to even put in a vague effort of comprehension you'll pick up the thread of the conversation. Drop another line when you're up to speed

"If you bother" to use your footy brain you might be able to suggest a single possible trade. Not one has been posted after thousands of posts, so hawks have every reason to be confident. When your done hurling insulting insinuations you might be able to contribute


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
so GC will take an inferior offer from Hawthorn over a better offer from other clubs... why?
They don't. But what club will. Not can. Offer more then Hawks?

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk
 
No understanding of my point at all mate. I knew all that anyway. My point is that how ridiculous the ruling is. So much for AFLPA pushing for more player power. Hard to understand?
how is it ridiculous? It's not a "ruling", it's a legal contract, and you appear to be proposing that one party to a contract should have less rights than the other two parties. Now that really is ridiculous.

Of course the club needs to get a say. If the player doesn't like it he's free to exit the club and join another club via the draft. Hard to believe you seriously think the club has too much power and the player not enough...
 
"If you bother" to use your footy brain you might be able to suggest a single possible trade. Not one has been posted after thousands of posts, so hawks have every reason to be confident. When your done hurling insulting insinuations you might be able to contribute


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"my footy brain".

Is that next to my think brain?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Traded Jaeger O'Meara [traded to Hawthorn for pick 10 and GWS's 2017 2nd rd pick]

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top