Traded Jaeger O'Meara [traded to Hawthorn for pick 10 and GWS's 2017 2nd rd pick]

[m0zza]

I doubt that Hawthorn would have done the trade for 10 without knowing that it was an acceptable basis for an O'Meara trade
The detail will come soon enough

 

[SnowRoo]

Your right he can if they can meet his contact demands, which only get revealed to clubs who have enough cap room prior to getting the number disclosed.

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

I'm sure North would be more than happy to trade 11+87 for pick 8
and happy to use pick 8 on O'meara if needed.

We have all the cap space needed to put the ball back in GC's court.

 

[HeHateMe]

I'm sure North would be more than happy to trade 11+87 for pick 8
and happy to use pick 8 on O'meara if needed.

We have all the cap space needed to put the ball back in GC's court.

So Gc lose

OUT: O'Meara, Pick 8
IN: Pick 87, Pick 11.

And they tell me I'm a dreamer.

Edit: there is plenty of rick going to the ND, but It's a win/win for Hawthorn. Either a top 9 talent or O'Meara + we keep the opportunity to trade future picks next year + we have plenty of cap room to hit free agency next year.

 

[HolyRioli]

You need to remember that this isn't GC trying to screw Hawthorn, this is GC trying to extract maximum value / get what they want

Trading pick 8 just so other clubs can draft him doesn't achieve them anything

 

[Prochard123]

If I was Hawthorn and GC refused to take 10 I'd let JOM walk to the ND. There's no way a club would take him before Hawthorn.

Btw what's your relationship with gillo?

 

[SnowRoo]

So Gc lose

OUT: O'Meara, Pick 8
IN: Pick 87, Pick 11.

And they tell me I'm a dreamer.

Edit: there is plenty of rick going to the ND, but It's a win/win for Hawthorn. Either a top 9 talent or O'Meara + we keep the opportunity to trade future picks next year + we have plenty of cap room to hit free agency next year.

No they get the trade they wanted on an equal playing field.

Pick 10 + Hartung + Sicily/Langford

More than happy to trade 8 back for 11+44 after the trade is done.

 

[reincarnated]

Has anyone mentioned in here that Suns are difficult to deal with.

 

[tiltraise]

Yes but do you want a disgruntled player playing for you?

Well we are already trading for a guy who will be out injured all of 2017 so who knows guess we will see.

 

[HeHateMe]

No they get the trade they wanted on an equal playing field.

Pick 10 + Hartung + Sicily/Langford

More than happy to trade 8 back for 11+44 after the trade is done.

What makes you think Hawks will fall for empty threats.

Pick 10 for O'meara and 2nd Rd pick.

With our bargaing power no less then this, the 2nd Rd pick will offset Hawks loss of ability to trade 2018 picks (something we could keep if we pick him in the draft).

Edit: will need to be pick 11 + Future 1st for it to be worth it for Gc.

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

 

[tiltraise]

Your right he can if they can meet his contact demands, which only get revealed to clubs who have enough cap room prior to getting the number disclosed.

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

Not sure about you guys but we have about 2m free in our cap.

 

[HeHateMe]

Not sure about you guys but we have about 2m free in our cap.

Better sign someone can't enter next year with that much cap space because you won't meet the cap floor. Getting O'Meara should help though. good luck.

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

 

[tiltraise]

Has anyone mentioned in here that Suns are difficult to deal with.

Umm...ever heard of that Dodo guy?

 

[tiltraise]

Better sign someone can't enter next year with that much cap space because you won't meet the cap floor. Getting O'Meara should help though. good luck.

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

Guess you arent too familiar with rules relating to front loading?

 

[TheFourPillars]

No they get the trade they wanted on an equal playing field.

Pick 10 + Hartung + Sicily/Langford

More than happy to trade 8 back for 11+44 after the trade is done.

hahaha

 

[tiltraise]

You need to remember that this isn't GC trying to screw Hawthorn, this is GC trying to extract maximum value / get what they want

Trading pick 8 just so other clubs can draft him doesn't achieve them anything

Thats not true it takes away your ND bargaining chip.

 

[Draft mad]

Brisbane
In: B.Hartung, pick 62
Out: P.Hanley
GCS
In: pick 10, P.Hanley
Out: J.O'mera, pick 62
Hawks
In: J.O'mera
Out: pick 10, B.Hartung

 

[00VicWard001]

AFL site suggesting that Pick 10 might head to Lions, Hanley to GC, O'Meara to Hawks and there will be other exchanges of picks and players as part of this.

Is Hanley the equivalent of JOM (in GC's eyes)?

 

[HeHateMe]

Guess you arent too familiar with rules relating to front loading?

I am, how about you and economic floors?

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

 

[tiltraise]

What makes you think Hawks will fall for empty threats.

Pick 10 for O'meara and 2nd Rd pick.

With our bargaing power no less then this, the 2nd Rd pick will offset Hawks loss of ability to trade 2018 picks (something we could keep if we pick him in the draft).

Edit: will need to be pick 11 + Future 1st for it to be worth it for Gc.

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

Once we acquire 8 you have little bargaining power.

You guys should have just paid GC a fair price from the start.

 

[tiltraise]

I am, how about you and economic floors?

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

If you understand the concept then it appears that perhaps you are the one with economic flaws

 

[Draft mad]

Is Hanley the equivalent of JOM (in GC's eyes)?

AFl site is not suggesting that! They have mentioned those names but probably not like that. Honestly do you think Hanleys worth pick 10? I rate him but he isn't that good

 

[HolyRioli]

Once we acquire 8 you have little bargaining power.

You guys should have just paid GC a fair price from the start.

And give it to yourselves, which leaves GCs net position the same

 

[vide0n]

Brisbane
In: B.Hartung, pick 62
Out: P.Hanley
GCS
In: pick 10, P.Hanley
Out: J.O'mera, pick 62
Hawks
In: J.O'mera
Out: pick 10, B.Hartung

We (Suns) might have to throw something a bit earlier to Brisbane but looks pretty good to me


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Tyler Hodges]

Hey mate, what happens if GC decide to trade pick 8 this year to the saints for the 2017 first rounder we just got today?

It goes back to being hawthorns problem.

The saints would take jaeger with 8, just like we would have taken him at 10.

Because then your bid for Fyfe next year would be dead in the water.

 

[Furn2]

Once we acquire 8 you have little bargaining power.

You guys should have just paid GC a fair price from the start.

What are u going to give up for 8 that makes it worth GC getting nothing fro JOM ?

It's nonsense that GC will lose another top 10 in order to facilitate them getting nothing for a player they can get a top 10 pick for.