Traded Jaeger O'Meara [traded to Hawthorn for pick 10 and GWS's 2017 2nd rd pick]

[Hawkscha]

why would I want to do that? Even you agree that he's just saying what he is always going to say

I agree to an extent that it has some sort of relation to the cap but I wouldn't go as far as saying its a cap squeeze

 

[Hawkscha]

wanna try again, this time in non-gibberish?

No need to, my point has clearly been made

 

[JG22]

10 and future 1st.

Do Hawks fans think this is well overs?, because its what GC will want minimum.

 

[HolyRioli]

10 and future 1st.

Do Hawks fans think this is well overs?, because its what GC will want minimum.

They won't get it

And yes, it's overs

 

[HeHateMe]

10 and future 1st.

Do Hawks fans think this is well overs?, because its what GC will want minimum.

this is so illogical.

 

[Myles]

They won't get it

And yes, it's overs

It will probably be pick 10 and a player and maybe a late round pick from GC depending on the player.

 

[MisterMarcus]

Ashcroft quoted on afl.com.au as saying both they and Hawthorn have spoken to "several players" about coming up there. So it doesn't sound like Hawthorn are trying to screw GC over. (....yet.....)

 

[HolyWars]

10 and future 1st.

Do Hawks fans think this is well overs?, because its what GC will want minimum.

They'll get 10 imo.....

 

[TazHawk15]

Ashcroft quoted on afl.com.au as saying both they and Hawthorn have spoken to "several players" about coming up there. So it doesn't sound like Hawthorn are trying to screw GC over. (....yet.....)

Exactly, if the GCS get to greedy then the Hawks just go bang.

The Hawks have just taken the bargaining power off them.

 

[JG22]

this is so illogical.

Why, because they want players or just overs?

Was just looking for a sense of it, I think the Suns will be adamant on that sort of worth, although it may come through senior players.

 

[pinot]

Pick 10 for a payer that hasnt played a decent game of football for two years seems to be overs need to throw a player in the mix.

 

[Andronicus]

Some people do not know what Nominated means

Irony?

 

[HeHateMe]

Why, because they want players or just overs?

Was just looking for a sense of it, I think the Suns will be adamant on that sort of worth, although it may come through senior players.

there is no sense in it. how have things deteriorated so far, to the point hawks look like there setting there self up for a ND attempt.

 

[Tyler Hodges]

I've always been curious what happens if say he went to the PSD and Essendon takes him pick 1, does he have to go? What if he tells every other club who says we are taking you, I'm not going to play for you, what happens in that scenario?

 

[The 747]

I've always been curious what happens if say he went to the PSD and Essendon takes him pick 1, does he have to go? What if he tells every other club who says we are taking you, I'm not going to play for you, what happens in that scenario?

He either plays for Essendon or sits out two years* with no pay.

*might be one year now

 

[The_Steadier]

This is Hawthorn's hard stance now, especially if Carlton give Pick 5 and Richmond Pick 6. Pick 10 take it or leave it.

Yep that's it.

Gold Coast will try and extract a little more out of it, 10 and Hartung for instance...

Which may work...maybe the hawks don't want to test their theory of getting jaeger in the draft unless they absolutely have to?

But yeah it will now almost certainly be pick 10 or pick 10 and steakknives for jaeger.

 

[Tyler Hodges]

He either plays for Essendon or sits out two years* with no pay.

*might be one year now

Would that sit out be due to him being on the Don's list abd not playing, or as an AFL sanction for not signing the contract?

 

[The 747]

Would that sit out be due to him being on the Don's list abd not playing, or as an AFL sanction for not signing the contract?

I think it's an AFL sanction but others may know for certain. You can't go in the draft and refuse to play.

 

[The_Steadier]

The Hawks have just taken the bargaining power off them.

You of course meant to say:

The Hawks just paid the Saints heaps to take the bargaining power off them.

Yes that's correct.

 

[TazHawk15]

You of course meant to say:
The Hawks just paid the Saints heaps to take the bargaining power off them.

Yes that's correct.

We are always looking after the little guy.

 

[Tyler Hodges]

10 and future 1st.

Do Hawks fans think this is well overs?, because its what GC will want minimum.

We gave up
That future 1st to land pick 10, Hawks have taken GC bargaining now they must have been too Greedy in what they are after, getting Hartung is now out of the question for the greedy little squibs, I want to see us take him in the ND would be so sweet.

Not a surprise to see Ashcroft come out of the woodwork and drop the tough guy act; " oh yeah talks have progressed Jaeger talks are going along nicely."

 

[Tyler Hodges]

I think it's an AFL sanction but others may know for certain. You can't go in the draft and refuse to play.

But aren't the GC saying they will force him into the PSD surely the AFL couldn't/wouldn't punish a player who was out of contract and didn't want to be drafted?

 

[Myles]

Not a surprise to see Ashcroft come out of the woodwork and drop the tough guy act; " oh yeah talks have progressed Jaeger talks are going along nicely."

He probably said that because you now have a pick we want, you didn't before.

 

[HairyO]

He probably said that because you now have a pick we want, you didn't before.

You wanted players. Is 10 enough now?

 

[Furn2]

10 and future 1st.

Do Hawks fans think this is well overs?, because its what GC will want minimum.

We just traded our future 1st to you.

If GC were seeing sense they would have taken what we traded for 10 but now we've secured him regardless so they can take 10 or nothing either way he's a Hawk.