i said 10 people, i wouldnt say that was many but its still fact. I remember just a year ago even saying anyone was hurt from the vax and you were a conspiracy theorist. I agree that the vaccine has most probably helped some people and has most probably hurt some people, i still think the facts are it wasnt tested properly as it couldnt have been tested properly without the proper time. The data shows overwhelmingly that people below the age of 50-60 didnt really need the vaccine and were most probably better off not geting it and certainly children were not needed to get it because age is very significant for the virus. The data on vaccine injuries is very dodgy because there are a lot of hoops to jump through for it to be marked as injury as that opens up compensation avenues and the government makes it very hard to do this so most of the injuries are relegated to other things because there is no direct correlation or no-one wants to acknowledge correlation. Im pretty sure the vaccines companies were the first ones to say that there is a possibility of heart problems from the vaccine when they were first issued yet it was pretty much pushed by governments as all ok without any mention of this. The hospitalisation numbers are pretty much the same since the vax numbers were over 90 percent so its debatable to say its completly effective and once again comes down a lot to age. My personal opinion is that it wasnt needed in a large portion of the population, the governments were wrong when they said its a pandemic of the unvaccinated and the unvaxxed were a risk to the elderly etc by not being vaxxed when its been proved that vaccination does nothing to limit others getting it from you. They were wrong with lockdowns simply because it would have been better to keep everything open in reduce movement rather than only have supermarkets open and that is where everyone went, it most probably increased infection by centralizing people into one location rather than spreading it out. Also i would seriously question the effectivness of the vaccine in that i dont think i have ever heard of a vaccine that loses it effectiveness after 2 or 3 months, most vaccines traditionally are long term options and i think it should be called a medication rather than a vaccine due to its short life span.
I've had 5. Haven't had covid.
This is simply not true.
there are a lot of people with experiences that will testify against this, you can call them all lairs if you want but they experienced it and its pretty disingenuous to dismiss them. I remember the initial test results from the vax companies saying that there is a increased risk of certain heart conditions in certain people, that doesnt mean everyone and it doesnt mean in will happen but that i can happen. They said it not me
I'm not saying people haven't had adverse reactions. Some mild, some severe.
there is data out there that would confirm that its not all hunky dorey as the government would have you believe. I think both sides have valid points but it just seems to be the extreme coming from both sides. The antivaxxers will tell you the sky is falling while the vaxxers will tell you "nothing to see here, go get your 6th booster" Like with most things the truth is somewhere in the middle and netiher side want to acknowledge any fault.
Proved his point in one word. Impressive.
Nice try, but unlike you I am able to see both sides.
Ah ok, I looked at the wrong post.
