Traded James Peatling traded to Adelaide with F3 & F4 (both tied to GWS) for F2 (tied to Adelaide)

Remove this Banner Ad

At that point I’d hope we can afford to move Dawson back to his outside role. Pick 4 + Soligo + Peatling + Rankine would be mainstays, potentially Edwards, Taylor, Curtin too.

Pedlar would remain a point of difference (unless we draft a Lalor type) but as he struggles to stay on the park a consistent half forward role would be a win. I’ve never really seen a midfielder in Rachele.
We also have Pedler to move into the midfield if he can get his body healthy, and Dowling, Taylor and Scholl have shown things this year.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

lol .. you were crying about the Hately trade somewhere an hour or so ago
He's being facetious, it's a reference to an earlier post about how anyone who starts a post with "I have it on good authority" should be banned.
 
He's being facetious, it's a reference to an earlier post about how anyone who starts a post with "I have it on good authority" should be banned.
Oooooh .. bugger .. do I need to go and hide behind the couch now?


No .. I'll run around dancing like a massive flog and rejoice our new legend :thumbsu:
 
No clubs wasting a list spot on a player that doesn't want to be there. Clubs don't even keep players they have in contract if they say they want to go to a other team. Dreams of snatching him in the PSD are just that, a dream.

AFL discourage the practice, so do player managers

That’s why we very see the threat become a reality

A player almost always lands at their destination


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I wouldn't. We already have heaps of picks around this mark.
Heaps?

At the moment it would be your 2nd pick.

Then you will get 2 picks near by for 2x FA.

It would be a useful pick in a strong draft that you would use.
 
He tackles well and gives his all but ability wise he is limited. His best trick to win the ball is draw a head high free.
I wouldn't. We already have heaps of picks around this mark.
So on one hand according to you he has limited ability but on the other hand he is worth more than pick 25.

At least get your lies in order. ;)
 
Your list management team made the decision to previously burn bridges. There is a lot of interest in JP and the scenario isn't in your favour.
lol, because you wouldn't accept significant overs for Hately.

You are funny...
 
Himmelberg last year, now you get no compo. Bids on our academy players.
We needed Berg who was contracted as we had no replacement depth (was contingent on Chol being traded in).

Everyone bids on academy players when they want.

Sydney bid on out only Father & Son Michaelanney 2 years ago, making him an unexpected 1st round pick.

Do you always have this sense of entitlement?
 
We needed Berg who was contracted as we had no replacement depth (was contingent on Chol being traded in).

Everyone bids on academy players when they want.

Sydney bid on out only Father & Son Michaelanney 2 years ago, making him an unexpected 1st round pick.

Do you always have this sense of entitlement?

Just after the best deal for a player in high demand.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Traded James Peatling traded to Adelaide with F3 & F4 (both tied to GWS) for F2 (tied to Adelaide)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top