As well as the small fact that there is no compelling reason to become a republic in the first place.Has zero chance of going ahead
Murdoch will ensure its defeat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As well as the small fact that there is no compelling reason to become a republic in the first place.Has zero chance of going ahead
Murdoch will ensure its defeat
Ahh yes, its all Murdoch's fault.Has zero chance of going ahead
Murdoch will ensure its defeat
The way referenudms normally do? Pick an alternative date and people vote on option or if there is no option vote to cancelHow exactly would a referendum on Australia Day work?
Zero chance of it succeeding unless the republicans actually agree a model (which should be easy but some want an all powerful elected president which is last thing we need)Has zero chance of going ahead
Murdoch will ensure its defeat
Probably a question only our indigenous brothers and sisters can answer as they were the ones invaded.So far you have replied to me twice and said nothing.
According the AIATSIS website, there are more than 250 Indigenous languages - each one specific to a particular place and people. Clearly these disparate groups across a huge landmass were not all invaded on January 26th 1788. For example, the Swan River Colony was the first British settlement in what is now Western Australia, established on August 12, 1829. Was that an invasion day? Some Aboriginal groups did not have significant interactions with Europeans until the late 1800s.
How?Has zero chance of going ahead
Murdoch will ensure its defeat
You do understand the strong communication system that took place between various Aboriginal mobs and how quickly word spread from mob to mob about the invasion. The majority of elders across the various country's recognise January 26th as Invasion Dsy. Anything else is just made up.
Can you please elaborate on this strong communication system and how it operated?You do understand the strong communication system that took place between various Aboriginal mobs and how quickly word spread from mob to mob about the invasion. The majority of elders across the various country's recognise January 26th as Invasion Dsy. Anything else is just made up.
Apart from the fact referendums are for constitutional changes.The way referenudms normally do? Pick an alternative date and people vote on option or if there is no option vote to cancel
On SM-A136B using BigFooty.com mobile app
You are making a fool of yourself. There is no way Aboriginal tribes in the Swan River area had a clue about the First Fleet landing at Port Jackson 4,000 km away.
Even communication across 100 km would have been very challenging, given that people would have had to walk for days, without reliable food or water, to meet a potentially hostile tribe who spoke another language.
Can you please elaborate on this strong communication system and how it operated?
Because any referendum needs bi partisan support to get upHow?
Again , why would Murdoch give a flying fart?Because any referendum needs bi partisan support to get up
Libs/Murdoch will be against any change
To play the culture wars game all his media loveAgain , why would Murdoch give a flying fart?
But isn't it media such as The Guardian, The Nine mastheads, the ABC and SBS who are clamouring to change the date?To play the culture wars game all his media love
Outrage etc etc for clicks
No - referendums are a federal matter anyway.Did Victoria have a referendum to decide on the GF parade public holiday?
It was tongue in cheek, due to the idiocy, talking of a referendum to change the date of a celebration day, which has changed multiple times in the past.No - referendums are a federal matter anyway.
But isn't it media such as The Guardian, The Nine mastheads, the ABC and SBS who are clamouring to change the date?
That headline only exists in your mind. And I can barely recall a Murdoch paper that has had the Australian flag on it save for maybe a gold medal at the Olympics or something similar.Occasionally they’ve published an opinion column asking for a date change, but also alongside opinion columns not wanting a date change.
The Murdoch papers have front pages festooned with flags and headlines “REAL AUSSIES WANT TO CELEBRATE AUSTRALIA ON JANUARY 26th!”
Pretty sure Dutto raised it first this year, apropos of nothing. He wants a culture war and the press are often happy to follow.That headline only exists in your mind. And I can barely recall a Murdoch paper that has had the Australian flag on it save for maybe a gold medal at the Olympics or something similar.
The fact is, if the left wing press did not raise the subject every year, then there would be no need for anyone to counter argue against it. Makes logical sense, if nobody is against then there is no need to argue in favor.
So the ;culture war' is started by those wanting to change the date, not keep the date.
As above, I think what the Left really want is for their proposals just to be accepted and that nobody should be allowed to debate its merits.
the angst it caused - even amongst colleagues where i worked at the time - was bizarre when introducedDid Victoria have a referendum to decide on the GF parade public holiday?
Nobody is allowed to have a different opinion? There are usually two sides to be debated.Because any referendum needs bi partisan support to get up
Libs/Murdoch will be against any change