January 26th 2025

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

So far you have replied to me twice and said nothing.

According the AIATSIS website, there are more than 250 Indigenous languages - each one specific to a particular place and people. Clearly these disparate groups across a huge landmass were not all invaded on January 26th 1788. For example, the Swan River Colony was the first British settlement in what is now Western Australia, established on August 12, 1829. Was that an invasion day? Some Aboriginal groups did not have significant interactions with Europeans until the late 1800s.
Probably a question only our indigenous brothers and sisters can answer as they were the ones invaded.

On SM-A136B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
You do understand the strong communication system that took place between various Aboriginal mobs and how quickly word spread from mob to mob about the invasion. The majority of elders across the various country's recognise January 26th as Invasion Dsy. Anything else is just made up.

You are making a fool of yourself. There is no way Aboriginal tribes in the Swan River area had a clue about the First Fleet landing at Port Jackson 4,000 km away.

Even communication across 100 km would have been very challenging, given that people would have had to walk for days, without reliable food or water, to meet a potentially hostile tribe who spoke another language.
 
You do understand the strong communication system that took place between various Aboriginal mobs and how quickly word spread from mob to mob about the invasion. The majority of elders across the various country's recognise January 26th as Invasion Dsy. Anything else is just made up.
Can you please elaborate on this strong communication system and how it operated?
 
The way referenudms normally do? Pick an alternative date and people vote on option or if there is no option vote to cancel

On SM-A136B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Apart from the fact referendums are for constitutional changes.
 
You are making a fool of yourself. There is no way Aboriginal tribes in the Swan River area had a clue about the First Fleet landing at Port Jackson 4,000 km away.

Even communication across 100 km would have been very challenging, given that people would have had to walk for days, without reliable food or water, to meet a potentially hostile tribe who spoke another language.

I don’t think the poster meant communication across the Nullabor. However contact between groups on the tightly packed SE corner would have spread gradual word of the arrival of boats carrying light skinned people.

Don’t forget British people didn’t permanently arrive in Victoria until some 20 years after the so called “Australia day” landing in Sydney harbour, 30 years til they crossed west of the Blue Mountains and 40 years til they got to Queensland.

Further inland, Indigenous peoples were warned of the British invasion after the Cumberland Plain had been taken by 1815, and this information preceded them by hundreds of kilometres.


It unfortunately seems the main way indigenous tribes knew about the arrival of the British was the sudden arrival of smallpox which spread through indigenous communities like wildfire
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

But isn't it media such as The Guardian, The Nine mastheads, the ABC and SBS who are clamouring to change the date?

Occasionally they’ve published an opinion column asking for a date change, but also alongside opinion columns not wanting a date change.

The Murdoch papers have front pages festooned with flags and headlines “REAL AUSSIES WANT TO CELEBRATE AUSTRALIA ON JANUARY 26th!”
 
Occasionally they’ve published an opinion column asking for a date change, but also alongside opinion columns not wanting a date change.

The Murdoch papers have front pages festooned with flags and headlines “REAL AUSSIES WANT TO CELEBRATE AUSTRALIA ON JANUARY 26th!”
That headline only exists in your mind. And I can barely recall a Murdoch paper that has had the Australian flag on it save for maybe a gold medal at the Olympics or something similar.

The fact is, if the left wing press did not raise the subject every year, then there would be no need for anyone to counter argue against it. Makes logical sense, if nobody is against then there is no need to argue in favor.
So the ;culture war' is started by those wanting to change the date, not keep the date.

As above, I think what the Left really want is for their proposals just to be accepted and that nobody should be allowed to debate its merits.
 
A quick skim through this thread and comparing it to the same thread circa 2018 or so, it's interesting that the narrative seems to have largely changed for opponents to changing the date from there not being anything wrong with the date to not wanting it change because of some nonsense about the woke left pushing the change on them.

It's so blatant and tells you everything you need to know. Not even worth properly engaging with that shit.
 
That headline only exists in your mind. And I can barely recall a Murdoch paper that has had the Australian flag on it save for maybe a gold medal at the Olympics or something similar.

The fact is, if the left wing press did not raise the subject every year, then there would be no need for anyone to counter argue against it. Makes logical sense, if nobody is against then there is no need to argue in favor.
So the ;culture war' is started by those wanting to change the date, not keep the date.

As above, I think what the Left really want is for their proposals just to be accepted and that nobody should be allowed to debate its merits.
Pretty sure Dutto raised it first this year, apropos of nothing. He wants a culture war and the press are often happy to follow.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

January 26th 2025

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top