Can anyone explain to me why a club should dedicate and divert resources into investigating unsubstantiated allegations about historical matters relating to players who are no longer on its list?
And if the club found some of the allegations to be true (and they may well be, we don't know), what action would it be expected to take apart from assuring supporters that there are presently no such issues and measures are now in place in an effort to avoid any repetition?
And this is all happening at a time when the biggest club in the league has admitted that they have several current players who have been using drugs, not to mention all of the other players who have been self-reporting etc. FFS........
I am curious about whether Craddock agrees with the above but decided to (or was directed to) go down the "beat-up" path. And then there's Patrick Smith....
Where's John? I think I'm with you mate!
And if the club found some of the allegations to be true (and they may well be, we don't know), what action would it be expected to take apart from assuring supporters that there are presently no such issues and measures are now in place in an effort to avoid any repetition?
And this is all happening at a time when the biggest club in the league has admitted that they have several current players who have been using drugs, not to mention all of the other players who have been self-reporting etc. FFS........
I am curious about whether Craddock agrees with the above but decided to (or was directed to) go down the "beat-up" path. And then there's Patrick Smith....
Where's John? I think I'm with you mate!