- Apr 12, 2012
- 47,840
- 44,926
- AFL Club
- GWS
So taking shots at someone getting it wrong.I was wrong but I had a crack nonetheless.
But you "had a crack" lol fmd.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
So taking shots at someone getting it wrong.I was wrong but I had a crack nonetheless.
a few seconds ago
Jeremy Cameron has been suspended for FIVE weeks.
5 weeks. Was thinking it would be 4.
Could be worse. Especially with the Intentional sentence.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
tbh I think it's fair.a few seconds ago
Jeremy Cameron has been suspended for FIVE weeks.
Looked like a 5-6 weeker. I thought with the hype he would get 6. No way was he getting 2-3. 5 weeks is not a bad result for GWS considering the damage done to Andrews.So taking shots at someone getting it wrong.
But you "had a crack" lol fmd.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
It is just, 4 + 6 divided by 2 equals 5.The moment it was guilty of intentional I expected it to be six. A bit surprised with five. I wonder if it was an indicator of "look, it could be worse if there's an appeal".
Think you might be reading a bit much into it. More likely there was disagreement and it was a compromise.The moment it was guilty of intentional I expected it to be six. A bit surprised with five. I wonder if it was an indicator of "look, it could be worse if there's an appeal".
not sold it was intentional
Why? Because the media and bigfooty were pushing for 10 the whole week? It is a common tactic to get a compromise, like Trump in the Art of the Deal. I hope the club appeals this.tbh I think it's fair.
Think you might be reading a bit much into it. More likely there was disagreement and it was a compromise.
I think the tribunal's system isn't that the high contact is necessarily intentional, but that the contact was intentional - which Jeremy had already admitted in his post-match interview.
I dont get intentional contact is illegal anyway. But what happened was.I think the tribunal's system isn't that the high contact is necessarily intentional, but that the contact was intentional - which Jeremy had already admitted in his post-match interview.
Have to got to the bit where he should be put in stocks then flogged around the fleet yet?I see what you guys mean.
The main board are out of control!! My goodness.
You are aware that Harris Andrews has been in hospital with bleeding from the brain from an intentional elbow in the head?You are aware Cameron was given a free kick for a push in the back which was over ridden after the high contact right?
Have some context before you speak
You do know there are kids starving while you eat your dinner every night, have some context before you survive.You are aware that Harris Andrews has been in hospital with bleeding from the brain from an elbow in the head that wasn't necessary?
Have some context before you speak.
You're a known troll with history on this board. Why haven't you answered my question if you came for sensible discussion?You are aware that Harris Andrews has been in hospital with bleeding from the brain from an intentional elbow in the head?
Have some context before you speak.
I didnt see you wondering how Ward was demanding a penalty after he was knocked out.You are aware that Harris Andrews has been in hospital with bleeding from the brain from an intentional elbow in the head?
Have some context before you speak.
Don't feed the trolls!You're a known troll with history on this board. Why haven't you answered my question if you came for sensible discussion?
To be honest I have no idea how how this works other than the whims of the vfl media.The moment it was guilty of intentional I expected it to be six. A bit surprised with five. I wonder if it was an indicator of "look, it could be worse if there's an appeal".
We have history, but your right. I will stop.Don't feed the trolls!
I only answer intelligent questions.You're a known troll with history on this board. Why haven't you answered my question if you came for sensible discussion?