- Sep 26, 2004
- 47,865
- 64,848
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Moderator
- #1,314
Infractions and thread bans have been handed out.
Keep it civil and on topic, or keep it to yourself.
Thanks.
Keep it civil and on topic, or keep it to yourself.
Thanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Fair enough mate all good I have nothing against you or St Kilda. Just feel bad for BattleDon't get me wrong, I really dislike the timing of the Saints offers. If we had the cash as in our last offer, why didn't we just offer that from the outset?
But at the same time, if he was "mentally ready to go" then he shouldn't be telling his teammates and coaches that he's staying late in the season and engaging in extensive negotiations with the club. That's the crux of it - I think both parties have reasons to be annoyed at how the other has gone about it.
In any case, he'll do great at Hawthorn and I'll certainly be cheering for him when he plays
Or you knowAll i'm seeing in the discussion at the moment is that a lot of Hawks supporters are ready to dog their mates at the drop of a hat.
They didn’t acknowledge it… so same same.At least they didn't do an Adelaide and wipe out his 3rd place finish
Did Buddy leave on bad terms with the club at the time?
My fading memory was that most knew he was moving on but to GWS. It was the choice of Sydney that blindsided allNot that I remember at least with the players. That being said, I don't think he appreciated an unannounced visit from Clarkson who had tracked him down while he was on his holidays overseas to try and get him to stay.
Buddy is still friendly with the ex teammates. Even came down to watch the Hawks a few times at the G this year. Still think he's very much in the fold of the Brown and Gold as well as Sydney.
I think we accepted that he was gone. Shocked that he went to a rival thoughMy fading memory was that most knew he was moving on but to GWS. It was the choice of Sydney that blindsided all
My fading memory was that most knew he was moving on but to GWS. It was the choice of Sydney that blindsided all
Sydney had done the work as early as 2012. The fact they kept it under wraps for so long is impressive.
Internally Hawthorn felt it was GWS with a 'reasonable' offer that Hawthorn could match to force a favourable trade (GWS has huge assets which they were happy to give up). What no one saw coming was the unbelievable (and arguably reckless) offer from Sydney that Hawthorn had no hope in matching. Resulted us in getting shafted by compo.
Tom Barrass pretty much said he would be an Eagle for life unless the rug was pulled out from under him.
Circumstances can and do change.
Yet, he was given life membership at the B&F and spoke magnificently about the club.
It was all done with class from both sides.
The only positive for Battle, is that at least he doesn't have to front up for a premiership reunion I guess.
The leaving for less was St Kilda's attempt at pushing our price up to get first rnd comp. The initial contract according to St Kilda supporters was 2million less than that. So yes he left for less but there were circumstancesThey've gone over the top, but it's different to Barrass. Barrass is a premiership player, that does change things as hes achieved the ultimate for your club. Battle is also leaving to go to a club in the same state for less money. Thats pretty rare that happens when a team wants to keep them. If a West Coast player you liked say Waterman or Allen or someone, left for Freo for less money than the Eagles are offering, would it be taken as well by the club as the Barrass situation? West Coast are also at the bottom, like us, so you don't really care when older players leave and you get picks for th
They've gone over the top, but it's different to Barrass. Barrass is a premiership player, that does change things as hes achieved the ultimate for your club. Battle is also leaving to go to a club in the same state for less money. Thats pretty rare that happens when a team wants to keep them. If a West Coast player you liked say Waterman or Allen or someone, left for Freo for less money than the Eagles are offering, would it be taken as well by the club as the Barrass situation? West Coast are also at the bottom, like us, so you don't really care when older players leave and you get picks for them.
Maybe the Saints should be worrying about why a young player wants to leave to another club for less instead of chucking a tantrum about it. He has done nothing wrong, just cop it on the chin and let him have one last night to celebrate at the club and wish him well on his way out.They've gone over the top, but it's different to Barrass. Barrass is a premiership player, that does change things as hes achieved the ultimate for your club. Battle is also leaving to go to a club in the same state for less money. Thats pretty rare that happens when a team wants to keep them. If a West Coast player you liked say Waterman or Allen or someone, left for Freo for less money than the Eagles are offering, would it be taken as well by the club as the Barrass situation? West Coast are also at the bottom, like us, so you don't really care when older players leave and you get picks for them.
Yes that’s common sense, but it also doesn’t fit the narrativeFairly obvious something happened we are not privvy too. St Kilda had plenty of players leave over the years and first time they done this with well the same people in charge for the most part.
Many players have not turned up to B&Fs after things went sour