- Sep 26, 2004
- 47,988
- 65,027
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Moderator
- #1,314
Infractions and thread bans have been handed out.
Keep it civil and on topic, or keep it to yourself.
Thanks.
Keep it civil and on topic, or keep it to yourself.
Thanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This was the one.Its on his partners facebook, not as a toddler not at a game. I posted it in one of these threads.
This was the one.
Josh at the MCG.
Where’s that saints fan gone that wanted to be slabs on it being band 1?
Nope but someone else didDid you take him up on it?
There calling it one of the most even top tens in draft history so dropping a couple spots won’t have the same impact as previous seasons the players from 2-10 could go anywhere will come down to specific club needs
Cool
Would the Saints then be open to trading pick 7 for Collingwoods pick 10 and a 4th rounder ???
Doubt any side would trade back like that for just a 3rd. A 2nd is much more of a chance but probably still need to be an earlier 2nd3rd maybe , second sure.
why are saints fans arguing with Carlton fans in hawthorn player Josh battle’s thread?
Yeah allrightBecause he's as much a Carlton player right now as he is a Hawthorn player, and on the DTFA we welcome fans of all clubs to join in the discussion.
why are saints fans arguing with Carlton fans in hawthorn player Josh battle’s thread?
Where’s that saints fan gone that wanted to be slabs on it being band 1?
Doubt any side would trade back like that for just a 3rd. A 2nd is much more of a chance but probably still need to be an earlier 2nd
And turn down $950K for 6 years......Sounds like he rejected the Saints' 'higher offer', with no indication that Hawthorn changed their position.
As such, I'm tipping that this will be only a Band 2 compensation.
Hopefully they get band 1 and on trade to port for HoustonHope hawks held firm on their offer
And means saints don’t get band 1