Traded Josh Battle - Joins Hawthorn as UFA

Remove this Banner Ad

He barely gets beaten in a 1 on 1. He wins his own ball.

He plays taller than he is. He can swing forward.

He will allow the hawks to move their exisiting players around the field.

Do you not understand how valuable all the above makes Battle to a club like the Hawks or staying at the saints?

The Hawks are just lucky we are desperate for high end mids and we have had a shit year so band 1 means a top 6 pick at worse
We played you last week. We know he's not that good. We saw it first hand.
 
Rankine said he would not leave GC unless the GC were properly compensated.

Rankines words out of his own mouth.
No, Rankine wanted to make sure that he didn't get forced into the preseason draft.

That is the limit to which he cared about GCS - he wanted them to get enough in return so they let him go.

Battle is an unrestricted free agent, so he doesn't need to care at all.
 
Unfortunately the compensation isn't tied to what you think a player is worth, it's based on where we finish. If Adelaide are concerned about their pick getting diluted, then don't finish above us on the ladder.

No one has issue really with McKay because he was probably worth a super high pick, but if North had finished minor premiers and only got pick 19 for him, no one would considered that fair. But that's how it works. See also Lance Franklin compo when he left.
McKay wasn't worth it either. The entire thing was dodgy af.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yeah, I'm going to need a source for that.

Seems INCREDIBLY unlikely that the league would measure a future contract against past contracts when trying to work out what a player's value is.

I mean, they've done a LOT of dumb things, but common sense says his 2025 contract would get measured against all signed 2025 contracts when calculating a band.
You can only measure the contract against existing contracts.

So what is the highest average salary of the top 10% of AFL paid players in 2024.

That’s how you measure compensation for a free agent.

What players are paid next year and beyond is irrelevant. The contract of the free agent is measured against the average guaranteed salary of existing deals.

Because each new free agent would impact the very next player leaving after them if it is based on what people are paid in 2025 and beyond.

I.e Perryman signs with a new club first would Infact impact Battle if it was based of 2025 and beyond salaries. But this isn’t a consideration as it’s based on salaries from 2024
 
the luck is not you desperate for high picks, is you didn't pay battle enough for him to be restricted. the saints have to accept whatever the afl give them as compo as they don't have an option to match.
They are lucky in that if this was solely all about money. We would be able to throw whatever we like without cap room.

There is a very important factor however at play and that is my clubs need for high end picks to go to the draft on mids.
 
He barely gets beaten in a 1 on 1. He wins his own ball.

He plays taller than he is. He can swing forward.

He will allow the hawks to move their exisiting players around the field.

Do you not understand how valuable all the above makes Battle to a club like the Hawks or staying at the saints?

The Hawks are just lucky we are desperate for high end mids and we have had a shit year so band 1 means a top 6 pick at worse
You'll most likely get Draper and Smith. Nailed it.
 
You can only measure the contract against existing contracts.

So what is the highest average salary of the top 10% of AFL paid players in 2024.

That’s how you measure compensation for a free agent.

What players are paid next year and beyond is irrelevant. The contract of the free agent is measured against the average guaranteed salary of existing deals.

Because each new free agent would impact the very next player leaving after them if it is based on what people are paid in 2025 and beyond.

I.e Perryman signs with a new club first would Infact impact Battle if it was based of 2025 and beyond salaries. But this isn’t a consideration as it’s based on salaries from 2024
I think its 5%.
 
Sheesh he's not May, hes not Weitering...WTF are we getting???

Is he Harris Andrews???
 
Rubbish.

He's a solid battler. He's not Weitering.

Weird take, along with the other Crows fan saying he's not Steven May. He's also not Patrick Dangerfield, what does it matter?

Battle is the best player in that position that's available, and he is just what Hawthorn need.
 
Last edited:
Josh Battle is not Mal Michael
 
He’s worth what the market will pay. You aren’t simply acquiring a player - he’s suited to our game plan, offers significant positional flexibility when combined with Sicily Hardwick weddle, gives great in game options and potentially helps fix the miss of pick 6 on DGB.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Problem is we ain’t paying a million a season- no matter how much the media nuffies talk it up.
Will be 800k for 6 years which won’t trigger band one- bit cruel to get Ain’ts supporters hopes up again- haven’t they already had enough pain…
😂


You know Jay Clark is a Ross Lyon mouthpiece in the media right?

Will be a nice surprise for you when we get band 1
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Traded Josh Battle - Joins Hawthorn as UFA

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top