Workshop Jumper Ideas for 2019

[Freight Train]

Freight Train, I just want you to know that I love you.

 

[Headless]

I'd be impressed if anybody had lurked this board more than I since its inception haha.

 

[LeeARM]

fffffffiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiine.

View attachment 495875​

Tough to argue, I quite like it with the purple.

View attachment 496245​

Good but it's not complete without the white piping.

 

[Freight Train]

Good but it's not complete without the white piping.

there’s just no pleasing people sometimes.

 

[offtherails9]

Sydney to Nike btw

 

[Fizzler]

Sydney to Nike btw

Wait aren’t you the adidas specialist?

 

[caloschwaby]

port have just as much claim to their own heritage

Port valued an AFL license more than they did maintaining their heritage. That's why they're in the league as "Power" and not magpies.

 

[Barrybran]

Port valued an AFL license more than they did maintaining their heritage. That's why they're in the league as "Power" and not magpies.

If the name "Magpies" were available they would be the Magpies. As it turns out, it was taken so, alas, Port Adelaide had to choose another moniker.

Anyone else in favour of Collingwood fans being banned on commenting on Port Adelaide's identity?

 

[The jouneyman]

give it up port...sick to death hearing about your prison bar jumper....your current afl jumper is awesome....be happy with that

 

[Freight Train]

Anyone else in favour of Collingwood fans being banned on commenting on Port Adelaide's identity?

aye.

 

[RossFC]

Port valued an AFL license more than they did maintaining their heritage. That's why they're in the league as "Power" and not magpies.

I don't think the magpies nickname at AFL level is an issue for Port supporters. We understand there is a clash there that can't be solved.

(Unless we are in the VFL where at 1 point there was 2 or 3 Tigers teams (Coburg, Werribee and Richmond reserves for some reason)

But the jumper problem can be solved via clash jumpers.

 

[Fizzler]

I don't think the magpies nickname at AFL level is an issue for Port supporters. We understand there is a clash there that can't be solved.

(Unless we are in the VFL where at 1 point there was 2 or 3 Tigers teams (Coburg, Werribee and Richmond reserves for some reason)

But the jumper problem can be solved via clash jumpers.

I should probably point out that Coburg were the Tigers due to their affiliation with Richmond. When Richmond got their own team they reverted back to their traditional name of Lions. So now there’s 2 which really is 1 too many but what can you do really?

 

[magpienato]

Port valued an AFL license more than they did maintaining their heritage. That's why they're in the league as "Power" and not magpies.

This basically sums up the whole debate. Port Adelaide can't have it's cake and eat it too.

 

[Fizzler]

Port valued an AFL license more than they did maintaining their heritage. That's why they're in the league as "Power" and not magpies.

Not necessarily. I’m sure we’d love to have been called the Magpies, but we weren’t allowed because of Collingwood. I think the general consensus among Port fans is that we’re fine to be called to the Power, and then a 50/50 split wanting Prison Bars or the BiB. But we are too far in now to change to the Magpies in the AFL (not that we’d be allowed to)

 

[nhptfke]

Quick mockup I did of the Eagles.

 

[Dylan8]

If the name "Magpies" were available they would be the Magpies. As it turns out, it was taken so, alas, Port Adelaide had to choose another moniker.

Anyone else in favour of Collingwood fans being banned on commenting on Port Adelaide's identity?

say word

 

[caloschwaby]

If the name "Magpies" were available they would be the Magpies. As it turns out, it was taken so, alas, Port Adelaide had to choose another moniker.

Anyone else in favour of Collingwood fans being banned on commenting on Port Adelaide's identity?

If it were the other way around and Collingwood had to join a national competition with the nickname "magpies" taken, I'd have no problem with us changing the moniker.

 

[caloschwaby]

But we are too far in now to change to the Magpies in the AFL (not that we’d be allowed to)

Exactly and that is why I find the debates around Port vs Coll futile as it won't realistically achieve anything.

 

[Fizzler]

Quick mockup I did of the Eagles.

I actually really like this. The feathered wings look great, and I’m sure if the Eagles were much newer they’d have done similar. And the AFL wordmark looks good on its own. A lot better than I thought it would.
Any chance you are from overseas? Because the Hungry Jacks logo isn’t based around the Burger King logo. But all in all this looks great.

 

[freo_leo29]

Sydney to Nike btw

After what they've done to Carlton, why would someone move to them?

 

[Andonis1997]

After what they've done to Carlton, why would someone move to them?

Alternatively, what is Nike doing adding another team when they can't even handle Carlton?

 

[offtherails9]

Alternatively, what is Nike doing adding another team when they can't even handle Carlton?

Think Nike/Carlton must be done at end of this year

 

[avishka5]

Not sure if this belongs here but does anyone know how long the Eagles contract with ISC is?

 

[flamingEMBERS]

feel sorry for Sydney if they go to Nike

 

[flamingEMBERS]

Not sure if this belongs here but does anyone know how long the Eagles contract with ISC is?

hopefully just two years. Really want an international athletic apparel brand