I haven't read the whole thread. But from a few posts I've noticed that the general concensus is Pies are slow, and Freo are fast.
This I agree with. We have a pretty slow midfield and Freo obviously have one of the quickest. But it seems as though we are judging "speed" on footspeed alone and couldn't be further from the mark.
Collingwood, through the likes of Swan, Beams, Pendlbury, Didak, Thomas, Shaw and O'Brien, move the ball accross the ground in a Geelong-like way. Absolute "ball speed" with pinpoint precision and accuracy. We don't have a Hill or Davey or Jetta or Judd to move the ball through the midfield by speed and/or strength, but rely on our fast hands and feet, as exemplified by the last 4 games.
So in this game of perceived slow vs. fast, I think it will actually be very even.
Other than that, without being biased I would tell other people to tip Collingwood on the basis that our goal kickers are eratic and hard to stop. Other than that it should be a very high quality and entertaining game.
May the best team win.
This I agree with. We have a pretty slow midfield and Freo obviously have one of the quickest. But it seems as though we are judging "speed" on footspeed alone and couldn't be further from the mark.
Collingwood, through the likes of Swan, Beams, Pendlbury, Didak, Thomas, Shaw and O'Brien, move the ball accross the ground in a Geelong-like way. Absolute "ball speed" with pinpoint precision and accuracy. We don't have a Hill or Davey or Jetta or Judd to move the ball through the midfield by speed and/or strength, but rely on our fast hands and feet, as exemplified by the last 4 games.
So in this game of perceived slow vs. fast, I think it will actually be very even.
Other than that, without being biased I would tell other people to tip Collingwood on the basis that our goal kickers are eratic and hard to stop. Other than that it should be a very high quality and entertaining game.
May the best team win.