Draft Expert Knightmare's 2021 Draft Almanac

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Horne dialogue is fascinating. I share the concern on his current production, but I'm just not that sure it matters? Sometimes it's linear, sometimes it's not, but plenty of accumulators as juniors don't adjust to the next level and plenty of low possession/high impact kids grow into higher production, especially if they're coachable and from all reports Horne very much is. I agree that he's probably not a brownlow medal winner or SA's best export, but he ticks a lot of pick one boxes - high floor, perhaps lower ceiling, but a nailed on 150 game, what you see is what you get 3-6th best player on a list.

The other thing that probably needs to be given consideration is role. He's playing in the SANFL seniors, and very few 17->18 year olds are strong enough players to command a starting on-ball role at that age. You need only look at the AFL to see the disparity in numbers between some players playing on a wing/forward flank vs in the guts - Bailey Smith is one who clearly springs to mind. So it's natural for Horne, who's playing forward flank/defensive oriented mid rotation, to settle into a role that doesn't lend itself to production.

So given Horne's a strong enough player to play seniors, but not currently strong enough to be a top 2-3 onballer in the side, he's playing in a role that's naturally less conducive to accumulation. And he's only a kid, it's hard to switch into 'midfield accumulator' mode on and off whether he's playing for Souths or playing for the academy/state side. It's probably the knock on playing these blokes in the seniors - is it really best for their development to be playing in 'team' oriented roles in the seniors, or best to be learning to tear a game apart in the colts? I think especially in the SANFL it's probably not ideal with smaller grounds than the WAFL promoting more inside congestion and less importance on outside running patterns and accumulation.

I look at De Goey as someone who as a junior you wrote this about, KM

Knightmare said:
Ability to find easy outside ball – The primary reason De Goey’s numbers are low at this stage is the lack of outside ball he finds and it has been an issue not only through the U18 Championships but also through the TAC Cup. He works his butt off in game, so it is not a lack of effort but he rarely finds the easy outside ball and will need to more often learn to find and work into those open spaces for his numbers to improve.

This was a sentiment backed up by others - at the same time, I wrote: Though he's a good inside ball winner and marking target around the ground he hasn't shown the ability to accumulate in volume yet which would be the next step for him.

I look at JDG now as someone who through the midfield probably wins too much cheap outside ball and accumulates quite prolifically when played in that on-ball role. Staggering to think we considered it a weakness. And his junior numbers certainly weren't prolific.

I think there was a similar knock on Steele from you at the time, and while he's by no means a prolific outside accumulator, he'd still get more uncontested ball now than most midfielders - and he's transitioned from a career 20-23 touch guy into a 30 touch guy in year 6-7. I look at Steele and see a similar style and trajectory to Horne. Horne perhaps a little more athletic and Steele a bit better in the stoppages. But that similar trajectory as a defensively tight mid with solid inside game, overhead ability and work rate who'll grow into an outside accumulator with targeted coaching.

He'll be fine. He'll grow. He'll develop. He'll learn. They're only kids and their current output/production is the sum of many factors, not just current ability.
 
Knightmare exactly how much of Keays have you seen recently?

Finding the ball was never his problem. At NEAFL level he was a machine.

His issues was ball use. Particularly his wayward kicking. Still very much is an issue from the little of Adelaide I watched this season.
 
Hey KM,

Has your view on Dylan Stephens change since draft year? I'm seeing some decent weapons, but I think his ceiling is probably a wingman like Isaac Smith, which wouldn't be a bad result.

If Stephens was in this year's draft, where would you consider him?

Stephens is a non improver and not someone I'd target this offseason. It's a bit like Fischer McAsey, I'm not overly enthusiastic about Stephens anymore either and place him in a similar basket. I just don't have that level of conviction that he'll improve. He could be worth somewhere around pick 40 let's say, but there are guys who would be available later than that who I'd take ahead of him.

I see Stephens as closer to James Aish than Isaac Smith.

He's a pass for me this offseason if Collingwood are getting any ideas. Collingwood have plenty in the way of outside types and have other needs that need addressing instead.

Setterfield was an absolute star. Never recovered from a wretched run of injuries in his first or second year of NEAFL when with GWS. He was on track to be very very good back then. Broken unit now poor bloke.

Injuries have indeed taken a toll on Setterfield, you're right. He was rightly in his draft year in the conversation with the likes of McCluggage/Taranto/McGrath as one of those top guys, and could well be in that conversation if not for the injuries.

Overall is it a better draft than last year?

I like the top few more from last year and this year doesn't have anywhere near the calibre of key position players early on. Other than that I do consider this year's draft stronger, with the depth in particular what's intriguing me personally.

I've been saying this in a few of my comments of late, but there are guys who won't be going early who I like a lot this year. Other than Jackson Callow who went undrafted, and to much lesser extents Jack Carroll and Sam Berry who I rated a good amount higher than clubs, there wasn't that really radical difference in opinion on my draft board as there will be this year. This year it's possible there could be 4-5 in my top-25 alone who could go late/rookie/undrafted/as a DFA, to make clear exactly the kind of value I think could be there to be had, at least based on my evaluation of talent this year.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The Horne dialogue is fascinating. I share the concern on his current production, but I'm just not that sure it matters? Sometimes it's linear, sometimes it's not, but plenty of accumulators as juniors don't adjust to the next level and plenty of low possession/high impact kids grow into higher production, especially if they're coachable and from all reports Horne very much is. I agree that he's probably not a brownlow medal winner or SA's best export, but he ticks a lot of pick one boxes - high floor, perhaps lower ceiling, but a nailed on 150 game, what you see is what you get 3-6th best player on a list.

The other thing that probably needs to be given consideration is role. He's playing in the SANFL seniors, and very few 17->18 year olds are strong enough players to command a starting on-ball role at that age. You need only look at the AFL to see the disparity in numbers between some players playing on a wing/forward flank vs in the guts - Bailey Smith is one who clearly springs to mind. So it's natural for Horne, who's playing forward flank/defensive oriented mid rotation, to settle into a role that doesn't lend itself to production.

So given Horne's a strong enough player to play seniors, but not currently strong enough to be a top 2-3 onballer in the side, he's playing in a role that's naturally less conducive to accumulation. And he's only a kid, it's hard to switch into 'midfield accumulator' mode on and off whether he's playing for Souths or playing for the academy/state side. It's probably the knock on playing these blokes in the seniors - is it really best for their development to be playing in 'team' oriented roles in the seniors, or best to be learning to tear a game apart in the colts? I think especially in the SANFL it's probably not ideal with smaller grounds than the WAFL promoting more inside congestion and less importance on outside running patterns and accumulation.

I look at De Goey as someone who as a junior you wrote this about, KM

This was a sentiment backed up by others - at the same time, I wrote: Though he's a good inside ball winner and marking target around the ground he hasn't shown the ability to accumulate in volume yet which would be the next step for him.

I look at JDG now as someone who through the midfield probably wins too much cheap outside ball and accumulates quite prolifically when played in that on-ball role. Staggering to think we considered it a weakness. And his junior numbers certainly weren't prolific.

I think there was a similar knock on Steele from you at the time, and while he's by no means a prolific outside accumulator, he'd still get more uncontested ball now than most midfielders - and he's transitioned from a career 20-23 touch guy into a 30 touch guy in year 6-7. I look at Steele and see a similar style and trajectory to Horne. Horne perhaps a little more athletic and Steele a bit better in the stoppages. But that similar trajectory as a defensively tight mid with solid inside game, overhead ability and work rate who'll grow into an outside accumulator with targeted coaching.

He'll be fine. He'll grow. He'll develop. He'll learn. They're only kids and their current output/production is the sum of many factors, not just current ability.

My view is very high floor with Horne but a moderate - high ceiling ie. can be top-5 on list calibre once developed and could win an All-Australian team selection or two. In other words, still very solid for an early choice, be it pick 1 or 2, without being a transcendent superstar who will be the face of the competition. And this should be consider a pretty fair view of a pick 1/2 contender given how many misses and unexpectedly poor career outcomes there have been over the years with both selections.

The interesting thing with Horne is when he has been playing in other games, he hasn't performed to expected. Even when allowed to play a more prominent midfield role. Whether it's his VFL game v Geelong where he was the primary midfielder along with Daicos. Then we had on the weekend the SA v WA game where Horne was unable to have an impact until he pushed forward, being well beaten by the lesser known Sheldrick (a 179cm mid who is still 17) who did well at stoppages getting a body between himself and the ball to prevent Horne from getting a run at the ball, and actually winning that matchup as the more influential midfielder.

The question as to whether it's beneficial to be playing League footy rather than u18 footy is one that has been revolving around my mind all year. Seeing the success of Powell and Poulter from the U18s having such instant impacts at AFL level. Then on the other side of the coin we've had a lot of cases of guys who played league football at younger ages play early at AFL level, but struggle to develop meaningfully from there on in, and fail to live up to expectation. I can't help but think a more prominent role in the u18s is more beneficial to development, as you're doing more and more involved in games and able to make more decisions and do more things with the ball whereas at League level the number of involvements will be a lot lower.

De Goey has developed a bit differently to how I was expecting. While I liked him forward, he became a much better forward than I imagined he could become. Through the midfield though, I had higher hopes that he would to a greater degree develop his contested ball winning which has been an area of disappointment. His second half to 2021 is the first time he has really been consistent as an accumulator, though again his contested stuff for someone his height and size should be much better. Some guys develop as accumulators later - see Gary Ablett Jnr, Dane Swan etc, so it's not always going to be known as juniors. Generally it's just looking for those who are high volume contested ball winners who translate over most consistently.

Steele I long liked as an accumulator and was surprised to see took as long as he did to catch on. He was a 30d, 10t, 10m guy as a junior. I flat out loved him as a midfielder and shouldn't have been nearly as conservative in my valuation of his talent as I was. He's much better than the 16th best from that year as I had him. I put too much weight into him being that little bit older, not being all that athletic, and being injury prone - all factors I've since learnt from and don't place the same weighting on.

Knightmare exactly how much of Keays have you seen recently?

Finding the ball was never his problem. At NEAFL level he was a machine.

His issues was ball use. Particularly his wayward kicking. Still very much is an issue from the little of Adelaide I watched this season.

I agree with you Keays' kicking is his relative weak point and what keeps him outside the competition's elite.

And I don't disagree either that he has always been able to rack up the footy. I rated him #5 in his draft year for a reason with what he could do both through the midfield and up forward. That said, he's finding it at AFL level like he has never done before in his career I'm sure you would agree. Without even looking at his stats I can tell you he'd be somewhere around the 10d per game mark better than he has been at any point in his AFL career to date. He's one of 2021's big improvers. And as I've been saying, he's not just a ball winner and accumulator who can hit the scoreboard, but defensively what he does is what's special as one of the premier tacklers and pressure players in the competition.
 
Knightmare,

Given all this discussion on the various draft threads, I thought it would be worth mentioning that there are three (3) South Adelaide free to air games, from this season, still on 7plus.

I assume some people weren’t aware and it could be of interest to draft followers (particularly North fans).

Saves having to buy any digital passes on the SANFL website.
 
Last edited:
Hi Knightmare, looking at the write ups on Goater the the common themes are big, powerful, composed, explosive and a hard worker… I’m wondering what are his potential limitations or question marks outside of unclear what his best position is? He seems a no brainer top ten pick from outside looking in when you see the impact Oliver, Taranto, Hopper and Wines are having around the league. Thanks
 
Watching Matthew Johnson on the weekend, I saw shades of Scott Pendlebury like you wrote about but I also saw a bit of the Bont. Would you agree?
 
Hi Knightmare, looking at the write ups on Goater the the common themes are big, powerful, composed, explosive and a hard worker… I’m wondering what are his potential limitations or question marks outside of unclear what his best position is? He seems a no brainer top ten pick from outside looking in when you see the impact Oliver, Taranto, Hopper and Wines are having around the league. Thanks
He's not a contested brute and there are real questions about his defensive workrate and running off the ball. Definitely a different type from those four you raise.
 
Knightmare,

Given all this discussion on the various draft threads, I thought it would be worth mentioning that there are three (3) South Adelaide free to air games, from this season, still on 7plus.

I assume some people weren’t aware and it could be of interest to draft followers (particularly North fans).

Saves having to buy any digital passes on the SANFL website.

I made a video a while back about all the ways to watch the games. Channel 7 is handy for state leagues.

The WA v SA game should still be on YouTube for those wanting vision from that game.

Hi Knightmare, looking at the write ups on Goater the the common themes are big, powerful, composed, explosive and a hard worker… I’m wondering what are his potential limitations or question marks outside of unclear what his best position is? He seems a no brainer top ten pick from outside looking in when you see the impact Oliver, Taranto, Hopper and Wines are having around the league. Thanks

Goater isn't to be confused with that level of ball winner or contested baller. He has been good when used inside winning first possession a fair bit, but not dominant like any of those guys for the same age and more someone who hopefully ramps up his ball winning - as he has a lot of the other tools - from the athleticism, to the distribution by hand and composure.

He's someone in the basket of: he's good in a few different positions without being able to identify as with an Oliver or Wines - he's beyond doubt best suited as a midfielder. He may well settle in defence as he has looked good there too, but people will look at a lot of what he does and try to make him into a midfield, which he has the mix of attributes to develop into.

Watching Matthew Johnson on the weekend, I saw shades of Scott Pendlebury like you wrote about but I also saw a bit of the Bont. Would you agree?

Stylistically: Pendlebury yes, Bont no.

I'm not seeing that kind of explosiveness or power to Johnson, nor the forward of centre weapons to enable him to play there. Johnson is more of a finesse guy with the skills and movement in traffic his tricks. If he develops his ball winning to a high enough level, that's when he can be a problem at AFL level, when you combine that with his height and class.
 
I made a video a while back about all the ways to watch the games. Channel 7 is handy for state leagues.

The WA v SA game should still be on YouTube for those wanting vision from that game.

Yep. There’s also the AIS v Geelong VFL game on the AFL YouTube site.

So all up there are 5 free and readily available games of JHF for avid draft followers to check out and make their own mind up.
 
Last edited:
24/3/2021 - 1000 subscriber special. Best AFL footballers drafted from 2016 to 2020 top-100 rankings:
1. Jack Lukosius
2. Noah Balta
3. Logan McDonald
4. Jamarra Ugle-Hagan
5. Matt Rowell
6. Bailey Smith
7. Sam Walsh
8. Max King
9. Ben King
10. Jy Simpkin
11. Zak Butters
12. Tom Green
13. Aaron Naughton
14. Nick Blakey
15. Charlie Ballard
16. Sam Taylor
17. Oscar Allen
18. Hugh McCluggage
19. Andrew McGrath
20. Tim Taranto
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkC4QdWYqvg&ab_channel=AFLDraftExpert

Hi KM, any chance you could re-do this? Or maybe change it to 2017-21?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

My view is very high floor with Horne but a moderate - high ceiling ie. can be top-5 on list calibre once developed and could win an All-Australian team selection or two. In other words, still very solid for an early choice, be it pick 1 or 2, without being a transcendent superstar who will be the face of the competition.

We've already got Tarryn Thomas for that.
 
My view is very high floor with Horne but a moderate - high ceiling ie. can be top-5 on list calibre once developed and could win an All-Australian team selection or two. In other words, still very solid for an early choice, be it pick 1 or 2, without being a transcendent superstar who will be the face of the competition. And this should be consider a pretty fair view of a pick 1/2 contender given how many misses and unexpectedly poor career outcomes there have been over the years with both selections.

Agree. Our evaluation of Horne's prospects is very similar, I just question the 'feel' of some of your rationale for arriving there. General sentiment towards high draft picks is that they're bankers, and for every Sam Walsh there's a Jon O'Rourke.

The interesting thing with Horne is when he has been playing in other games, he hasn't performed to expected. Even when allowed to play a more prominent midfield role. Whether it's his VFL game v Geelong where he was the primary midfielder along with Daicos. Then we had on the weekend the SA v WA game where Horne was unable to have an impact until he pushed forward, being well beaten by the lesser known Sheldrick (a 179cm mid who is still 17) who did well at stoppages getting a body between himself and the ball to prevent Horne from getting a run at the ball, and actually winning that matchup as the more influential midfielder.

The question as to whether it's beneficial to be playing League footy rather than u18 footy is one that has been revolving around my mind all year. Seeing the success of Powell and Poulter from the U18s having such instant impacts at AFL level. Then on the other side of the coin we've had a lot of cases of guys who played league football at younger ages play early at AFL level, but struggle to develop meaningfully from there on in, and fail to live up to expectation. I can't help but think a more prominent role in the u18s is more beneficial to development, as you're doing more and more involved in games and able to make more decisions and do more things with the ball whereas at League level the number of involvements will be a lot lower.

This is in particular the comment I think is especially, and perhaps needlessly, alarmist.

We're dealing with 17-18 year old kids here. They're not born adaptable. They grow into versatility and adaptability. Routine, structure, repeatability - they're the things these kids crave.

When you're throwing kids around all the time, they're not going to perform as well. I agree - his production in the academy game and the WA game wasn't as strong as one would hope. But when you take a kid who's entire mindset is rooted around a defined role - half forward: relentless pressure, set up here at stoppages, lead to this spot, occupy this space - etc. and then plonk him into the midfield the next week and say 'you're the man, be everywhere' - it's a big transition. And switching roles is a gradual process - especially for kids. Not everyone can just do a Darcy Parish.

I think the last para is correct - and I've reached a similar conclusion. But I'm not sure it's tarnishing these kids, just means that they're coming into the AFL system from a different role whereas the Poulter and Powell types have been working that role for the previous year. So the adjustment period is longer if they're switching roles.

I often see you talk about player X should play in defence and you model and project how their style will convert once shifted to a new position. I just think we look at Horne through that view - we're looking at a half forward and modelling how he'd go with some time to work on his midfield stuff.
 
My view is very high floor with Horne but a moderate - high ceiling ie. can be top-5 on list calibre once developed and could win an All-Australian team selection or two. In other words, still very solid for an early choice, be it pick 1 or 2, without being a transcendent superstar who will be the face of the competition. And this should be consider a pretty fair view of a pick 1/2 contender given how many misses and unexpectedly poor career outcomes there have been over the years with both selections.

The interesting thing with Horne is when he has been playing in other games, he hasn't performed to expected. Even when allowed to play a more prominent midfield role. Whether it's his VFL game v Geelong where he was the primary midfielder along with Daicos. Then we had on the weekend the SA v WA game where Horne was unable to have an impact until he pushed forward, being well beaten by the lesser known Sheldrick (a 179cm mid who is still 17) who did well at stoppages getting a body between himself and the ball to prevent Horne from getting a run at the ball, and actually winning that matchup as the more influential midfielder.

The question as to whether it's beneficial to be playing League footy rather than u18 footy is one that has been revolving around my mind all year. Seeing the success of Powell and Poulter from the U18s having such instant impacts at AFL level. Then on the other side of the coin we've had a lot of cases of guys who played league football at younger ages play early at AFL level, but struggle to develop meaningfully from there on in, and fail to live up to expectation. I can't help but think a more prominent role in the u18s is more beneficial to development, as you're doing more and more involved in games and able to make more decisions and do more things with the ball whereas at League level the number of involvements will be a lot lower.

De Goey has developed a bit differently to how I was expecting. While I liked him forward, he became a much better forward than I imagined he could become. Through the midfield though, I had higher hopes that he would to a greater degree develop his contested ball winning which has been an area of disappointment. His second half to 2021 is the first time he has really been consistent as an accumulator, though again his contested stuff for someone his height and size should be much better. Some guys develop as accumulators later - see Gary Ablett Jnr, Dane Swan etc, so it's not always going to be known as juniors. Generally it's just looking for those who are high volume contested ball winners who translate over most consistently.

Steele I long liked as an accumulator and was surprised to see took as long as he did to catch on. He was a 30d, 10t, 10m guy as a junior. I flat out loved him as a midfielder and shouldn't have been nearly as conservative in my valuation of his talent as I was. He's much better than the 16th best from that year as I had him. I put too much weight into him being that little bit older, not being all that athletic, and being injury prone - all factors I've since learnt from and don't place the same weighting on.



I agree with you Keays' kicking is his relative weak point and what keeps him outside the competition's elite.

And I don't disagree either that he has always been able to rack up the footy. I rated him #5 in his draft year for a reason with what he could do both through the midfield and up forward. That said, he's finding it at AFL level like he has never done before in his career I'm sure you would agree. Without even looking at his stats I can tell you he'd be somewhere around the 10d per game mark better than he has been at any point in his AFL career to date. He's one of 2021's big improvers. And as I've been saying, he's not just a ball winner and accumulator who can hit the scoreboard, but defensively what he does is what's special as one of the premier tacklers and pressure players in the competition.
Keays was never played in the middle at the Lions. He played two roles, fat side wing or pressure forward. Neither role really his forte.
 
We've already got Tarryn Thomas for that.

Correct. I personally think the benefit of JHF at Norf will be that he's walking into a young group of mids where he starts behind Simpkin, Thomas, Davies-Uniacke, Powell & Phillips. No rational North person is expecting this kid to walk in and change the club, which I personally think is a downfall of a lot of early type picks. He's going to have to work hard to get into that midfield in coming years, which is a good thing.

I'll be wrapped if JHF can become a better player then many project that Tarryn will become, but the future success of the club isn't completely reliant on him.
 
Agree. Thomas can be the Star.

Horne will be a key contributor by having an AFL ready defensive game. He won’t get lots of stats but for those who love two way runners (like me), he is a highly valued player.

You can never ever have too many defensively minded two way runners, especially those who can take a grab and kick a goal.
 
I wonder if north pick Callaghan over Horne? Is Horne really better

Callaghan certainly fits better on needs - classy user off half back.

Albeit I don't know what we would project Horne turning into - I suspect a kind of Voss/Ricciouto type beast midfielder who can also go foward.
 
When you mix the right complementary players in your team, you can get a much higher impact from the players you have.

LDU - burst away attacking midfielder

Philips - in and under warrior that creates space in tight for others

Powell - inside/outside creative midfielder

Simpkin: Gut running box to box midfielder

Stephenson - Skilful outside mid who can switch forward

Thomas - creative hard ball winning marking and goal kickng mid that will earn the tag

There's a spot there for Horne playing that kind of role as a two way running hard nosed mid imo.
 
Correct. I personally think the benefit of JHF at Norf will be that he's walking into a young group of mids where he starts behind Simpkin, Thomas, Davies-Uniacke, Powell & Phillips. No rational North person is expecting this kid to walk in and change the club, which I personally think is a downfall of a lot of early type picks. He's going to have to work hard to get into that midfield in coming years, which is a good thing.

I'll be wrapped if JHF can become a better player then many project that Tarryn will become, but the future success of the club isn't completely reliant on him.

Given Tarryn is tracking to be the best player North's had since Carey, this will indeed be something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top