pantskyle
Angry Ape
- Oct 1, 2007
- 128,609
- 134,366
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Storm-Man Utd-Heart-Luton-Patriots
Would rather he stays. Get on it WC.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The Doggies have #41 from the Lake Deal - Perfect value for both teams
If Essendon are in Play they may use their 2nd which is about #35, but they will probably want swapping later on in the draft.
Pears' manager was on radio this morning and said quite unequivocally that he would not be leaving Essendon. I doubt Essendon are considering trading him.
Don't see why, considering Pears has shown a lot more than Stevens and on top of that is a KPP.Pears should be a straight swap, dont know which other they would let go- would you really want Hooker ?
Whats he shown ??? just played 57 average games and is an in between height- 3rd tall who are hardly sought after tbh.Don't see why, considering Pears has shown a lot more than Stevens and on top of that is a KPP.
Don't see why, considering Pears has shown a lot more than Stevens and on top of that is a KPP.
Whats he shown ??? just played 57 average games and is an in between height- 3rd tall who are hardly sought after tbh.
Picks 35-50 is about his value.
So you have seen all of Pears' games?Whats he shown ??? just played 57 average games and is an in between height- 3rd tall who are hardly sought after tbh.
i have seen around 6-7 live and probably 10 gamnes on tv ----------- Nothing special mateSo you have seen all of Pears' games?
Not all his games were average.
Would've played more if he wasn't crueled by injuries.
Yes, he's short. But he's basically the same height as Glass.
Hardly sought after seems irrelevant.
Pears' value should be greater than Stevens'.
WHY ?
Inside mids are worth more than 3rd talls - specially average 3rd talls
i have seen around 6-7 live and probably 10 gamnes on tv -----------
Pears is not a third tall, although he could be played as one, his first two years were brilliant, he was defending well and rebounding out of defence, I can understand why you would think he is average but injuries have held him back. KPP's who have shown quite a bit are worth more than inside mids who are yet to show anything at AFL level, lets hope Koby can do that whether he ends up at Essendon or not.WHY ?
Inside mids are worth more than 3rd talls - specially average 3rd talls
Most of you guys obviously haven't been watching too much WAFL footy over the last couple of years because if you did you wouldn't be so desperate to get Koby. He's a bigger version of Schammer (couldn't hit the side of a barn, even if he were inside of it.)
That is just completely false.
You must do it with closed eyes because Kobe's kicking is not bad. Unless you were mistaking him for swift...
Completely agree with Tundrawolf. I have no idea whether you guys are even watching WAFL games but Kobe Steven's disposal is very very average. I would say almost worse than Swifts.
Koby Stevens had a game earlier this year against GWS where he had the ball 19 times and supporters were raving about his performance.... yet I was shaking my head at how he continually was turning the ball over, missing targets and choosing the wrong option.
The funny thing is Swift used to cop it in the neck from supporters for his disposal... yet Stevens who was worse was the golden child and people looked past it... just like Eric Mackenzie's disposal is not talked about. The fact Swift kept getting picked ahead of him says all you need to know.
even though you obviously see alot more of him than i do, i tend to agree. his disposal is quite ordinary, although at afl level he has been sub affected a couple of times, which is a role he really isn't suited to and hasn't helped his cause.
That being said essendon are obviously interested and see something in him (which I don't agree with), so what would be an appropriate deal? pick 48?
Anything below pick 38 and we've ripped you off.
Man, everywhere I look you are trolling your own team.
9 disposals a game from 33% game time... Sub roles skew stats.Really? where else?
I mean seriously lets be realistic about this... the guy has played 11 games in 3 years... averages 9 disposals a game.... has dodgy disposal and can't get a game for us.
He was drafted as a 2nd rounder.... what do you expect we are going to get back for him? A 1st round pick?