-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Kosi to play
- Thread starter Fred
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Just heard, good news, it's good to see all the champions on the ball park.
Source Fred?.
- Banned
- #4
On both charges?
3aw , SEN
His hit was deemed not hard enough to be reportable, the fact that it was low was bad luck as opposed to intentional.
His hit was deemed not hard enough to be reportable, the fact that it was low was bad luck as opposed to intentional.
Only appealed the striking charge as I understand it. So the only cost would be $4800 out of his weekly salary in the end.
Monocle
And the rebuild begins.
- Sep 18, 2003
- 12,299
- 38,951
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Claremont NE Patriots Eagles AFLW
Good news for the Saints 
justs make (a further ) mockery of the system.
Same as the Gehrig and Gardiner incidents , both of whom I went on record as saying should not have been suspended.
No wonder the Clubs and players get frustrated as they are never sure what to expect at the tribunal.
Such is life .
justs make (a further ) mockery of the system. Same as the Gehrig and Gardiner incidents , both of whom I went on record as saying should not have been suspended.
No wonder the Clubs and players get frustrated as they are never sure what to expect at the tribunal.
Such is life .
- Banned
- #9
Koschitzke? A champion!The Fireman said:
Good.
cypher said:Koschitzke? A champion!
Yep. In the mould of a darker Riewoldt.
Fred said:Or 5 months of mine.
Up that by 2 months and the same applies Fred
CorrectFred said:
- Banned
- #16
He isn't a champion and has to prove himself over a longer period to get that accolade.Bellablaise said:Yep. In the mould of a darker Riewoldt.
Agreed butcypher said:
Count his brownlow votes in a handful of games, the writing is on the wall.
This is good news. It's good to have the best players out there playing when there is so much at stake.
Exactly my point....unless it's BuckleyEagles4Ever said:
- Banned
- #20
There's just no consistency.The Fireman said:
This tribunal is a joke. In isolation, I'm happy to see Koschitzke get off, but in comparison to some other incidents this year, it doesn't make sense.
Gardiner, Matera and Gehrig all got rubbed out for love taps. Did they hit guys with significantly more force than Koschitzke?
I don't reckon players should get rubbed out unless their actions have the potential to injure a player or take him out of the game for a period.
Everything else is a matter of a free kick, not a week on the dielines.
What's the point of rubbing a guy out for innocuous little incidents that don't hurt anyone?
As I have stated in an earlier post, it seems the tribunal is learning on it's feet, for instance at the start of the year they gave Gherig 2 for his love tap , fought it and got 1, after the media and public battering they received they have gone soft on that charge. Notice how the tribunal is changing weekly like a chameleon and continually tuning their penalties and charges making Guinea Pigs out of the players.Gunnar Longshanks said:
Interesting to see how they treat Pickett/Headland now. Both bumps were worthy of the 50m, but in each case Wiggans and Couglan jumped up as soon as they knew they had the free kick.
Not the Collingwood players. They are lab ratsThe Fireman said:
And just think back to Curley/Fletcher/Matera/Everitt who all missed games for umpire contact, so this aint a new phenomenon.The Fireman said:
The more the tribunal learns, the more it forgets.
