- Jan 8, 2010
- 599
- 629
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
no worries guys, see you at the footy saturday?
Good luck. Stanhope have contributed to breaking Premiership droughts for Murchison and Merrigum. I sincerely hope you help Avenel break theirs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
no worries guys, see you at the footy saturday?
For one, I can see a big crowd turning up, could be an interesting dayHasn't been a great week for the league
Incredible. So instead of pursuing this at the time, a club goes down the track of fraudulently putting a player on a team sheet in a later game knowing that the player concerned cannot possibly "suit up" and take the field? I would very strongly suggest that Stanhope are still at fault and offended the rules as they failed to firstly seek rectification of the first issue and then knowingly broke the rules in the second instance. If, of course, that was the argument used.The line I believe that was going to be used had nothing to do with the Ardmona game, but the player in questions first game back for the club in the twos against Undera. He was on the team sheet and suited up to play, but a KDL official said he wasn't cleared and couldn't play, in the meantime the clearance was processed and he should have been able to take the field. Wasn't there tonight so no idea if that was used or Findlay found another line that they could take, I am sure it will all be in the Shepp News tomorrow
SO GLAD OF MY BOYS BEING ABLE TO RUN OUT THIS WEEKEND
You son are a joke.SO GLAD OF MY BOYS BEING ABLE TO RUN OUT THIS WEEKEND
Wet the bed did you?SO GLAD OF MY BOYS BEING ABLE TO RUN OUT THIS WEEKEND
Come 2017, if each club decides to forfeit against Stanhope mid week and pays the appropriate penalty and Stanhope finish up on top undefeated, does Stanhope actually have any players qualified for the finals or can they name anyone who may have driven past the ground at some stage?
GOOD LUCK ON THE WEEKEND BOYS, SO PROUD OF YOU GUYS
On the money Hank and he did take the field for a short time against Undera that day , Stanhope just needed to have proof I presume to overturn the verdict .The line I believe that was going to be used had nothing to do with the Ardmona game, but the player in questions first game back for the club in the twos against Undera. He was on the team sheet and suited up to play, but a KDL official said he wasn't cleared and couldn't play, in the meantime the clearance was processed and he should have been able to take the field. Wasn't there tonight so no idea if that was used or Findlay found another line that they could take, I am sure it will all be in the Shepp News tomorrow
NoThe process only taints things further.
Has Ian Findlay lost a kdfl case ?
Sorry but I can't find "lanky" on the map, is it near "Nahambie"?Come to lanky this week watch stanny put on a clinic
Why were Stanhope fined , they either played a ineligible player or they didnt
Can the Gum now appeal?
Are you suggesting the decision was purchased ?IMO maybe it went a little something like this.....You pay a hefty fine and we'll let you play.....
I
Incredible. So instead of pursuing this at the time, a club goes down the track of fraudulently putting a player on a team sheet in a later game knowing that the player concerned cannot possibly "suit up" and take the field? I would very strongly suggest that Stanhope are still at fault and offended the rules as they failed to firstly seek rectification of the first issue and then knowingly broke the rules in the second instance. If, of course, that was the argument used.
Are you suggesting the decision was purchased ?
Where are all the haters now?SO GLAD OF MY BOYS BEING ABLE TO RUN OUT THIS WEEKEND