- Thread starter
- #126
Re: Ladies and Gents, I Introduce to you the AFL's Most Underrated Coach of All Time!
I can't quite get over how foolish this post is.
Where do I start?
Firstly, the Cats wilted with 10 minutes to go when their experienced players were missing. Not sure if you happened to catch the game in between watching episodes of Queer as Folk, but if Geelong had have played out the game with heart until the final siren, you wouldn't know who Leo Barry is. He'd still just be one of those guys who plays that game that they watch down south who wears the tight shorts that you Sydney boys like to fantasize about.
I'm not quite sure about the Saints giving up. To the uneducated AFL follower, or even the level below that, or one step lower - Sydney supporters, it may have appeared that way. But to anyone else it was quite obvious we were overrun by a more experienced, healthier team with a full squad.
I'm not sure why Sydney should have been exhausted either?? Although I guess if you rely on the football media for your reference, you have no choice but to believe that sort of rubbish.
I'd say the Swans owe St.Kilda no amount of gratitude. I'd be directing that gratitude towards AFL house.
As for what happens in R11 of next year, I would suggest it would have the same relevance as R10 last year. None.
You deadset idiot. Fair dinkum, I can't believe I still get stupified by the footballing intellect of some people. But I do. Incredible.
Bloods Rule! said:After playing both teams in the finals, I reckon the Swans will be more nervous facing the Cats next year than facing the Saints. That's because the Cats played with heart until the final siren. The Saints simply gave up - and that was against a team that should have been exhausted.
That can only partially be blamed on Thomas' remarkable record of breaking his players.
The Swans owe the Saints a debt of gratitude for that R10 Dome thrashing. Every team has down games and that was certainly ours for 2005. It was a great wake-up call and the bounce back led to our Premiership. Thinking it indicates what will happen in R11 2006 when the Premiers play the Saints at the SCG is delusional.
I can't quite get over how foolish this post is.
Where do I start?
Firstly, the Cats wilted with 10 minutes to go when their experienced players were missing. Not sure if you happened to catch the game in between watching episodes of Queer as Folk, but if Geelong had have played out the game with heart until the final siren, you wouldn't know who Leo Barry is. He'd still just be one of those guys who plays that game that they watch down south who wears the tight shorts that you Sydney boys like to fantasize about.
I'm not quite sure about the Saints giving up. To the uneducated AFL follower, or even the level below that, or one step lower - Sydney supporters, it may have appeared that way. But to anyone else it was quite obvious we were overrun by a more experienced, healthier team with a full squad.
I'm not sure why Sydney should have been exhausted either?? Although I guess if you rely on the football media for your reference, you have no choice but to believe that sort of rubbish.
I'd say the Swans owe St.Kilda no amount of gratitude. I'd be directing that gratitude towards AFL house.
As for what happens in R11 of next year, I would suggest it would have the same relevance as R10 last year. None.
You deadset idiot. Fair dinkum, I can't believe I still get stupified by the footballing intellect of some people. But I do. Incredible.