News Lethers Gone

[Joffaboy]

So a guy who played footy, then did coaching is?
Why?

Good question. Didn't Gallagher play seniors for Adelaide?
Can we have the background of every list manager sowe can compare.
Would have thought a person intimately involved at AFL level then worked in high finance would be more equipped than most.
However somehow people know better

On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Cairnsman]

You first need to be a Saints supporter not a Carlton troll.

On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

I cringe when I hear old farts abuse posters with the troll label….i mean seriously I know we is just chatting about da footy but come on…at least make it interesting

 

[sunny3193]

You protest too much sexy

And you’re not denying that you’re a Carlton supporter.

 

[sammm]

I'll be happy with 1 flag.

 

[gringo2011]

So a guy who played footy, then did coaching is?
Why?

Sos? He's been a tried list manager. Trout would have been good if that was all that was required.

 

[StCicatriz]

This is absolute trype. Honestly, go back and delete this whole post, it's embarrassing herd mentality rubbish.

so you've selectively quoted the richo part. so i'll address that.

scrappy you must know more than those at the club if you think its rubbish or bullshit.

others know this, but i was called by someone at the club off the back of an email complaint in regards to the richo extension. i was told that lethers doesn't hold back and that if he thought richo wasn't up to it he would sack him now and pay him out, regardless of the extention that he inherited. they then went on to say that lether's thinks richo is a good coach he just needs more support. so they went and got ratts. they were also in the market for 3 decent free agents and had identified issues in list management around trout. also highlighted we have too many poor kicks. they thought with the right support around richo they would play finals. i remember being taken back about how much weight they put on the ratten appointment as senior assistant.

that's their words. not mine. it was their assessment of the football club then.

given you think it's rubbish i think it just goes to show how far off their assessment actually was.

which we shouldn't be a surprise by given the flip flopping in assessment that also occurred under ratts.

 

[Cairnsman]

And you’re not denying that you’re a Carlton supporter.

Gee your good, nuttin’ gets past you huh!

 

[StCicatriz]

Good question. Didn't Gallagher play seniors for Adelaide?
Can we have the background of every list manager sowe can compare.
Would have thought a person intimately involved at AFL level then worked in high finance would be more equipped than most.
However somehow people know better

On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

they either come up through recruiting or player management. gags didnt do either, which is what made it really weird.

the clear majority work their way through recruiting and get promoted. you get the odd one or two jumping straight out of player management. or you get the traineeship type arrangement when the long term list boss is training up his replacement.

Adelaide -> player management
Brisbane -> experienced AFL recruiter
Collingwood -> experienced AFL list manager
Carlton -> experienced AFL recruiter
Essendon -> AFL development coach + WAFL footy manager
Freo -> experienced AFL recruiter
GC -> experienced list manager
Geelong -> Wells has trained up Mackie over the last 4 years
GWS -> can't find
Hawthorn -> experienced AFL recruiter
Melbourne -> long time in football but was a recruiter prior to becoming list boss
NM -> long time in football mainly assistant coaching
Port -> experience AFL recruiter
Richmond -> long time in footy was at port adelaide moved to tigers to do list analysis then promoted
Sydney -> experienced AFL list manager
WB -> experienced recruiter and been in footy a long time
WCE -> lots of churn here but basically they appointed vozzo who was a player manager... then brady rawlings (now NM).. then Glass (something really weird here happened and there was some rumours) then promoted their long time recruiter... who's now retired.

 

[ScrappyDo]

so you've selectively quoted the richo part. so i'll address that.

scrappy you must know more than those at the club if you think its rubbish or bullshit.

others know this, but i was called by someone at the club off the back of an email complaint in regards to the richo extension. i was told that lethers doesn't hold back and that if he thought richo wasn't up to it he would sack him now and pay him out, regardless of the extention that he inherited. they then went on to say that lether's thinks richo is a good coach he just needs more support. so they went and got ratts. they were also in the market for 3 decent free agents and had identified issues in list management around trout. also highlighted we have too many poor kicks. they thought with the right support around richo they would play finals. i remember being taken back about how much weight they put on the ratten appointment as senior assistant.

that's their words. not mine. it was their assessment of the football club then.

given you think it's rubbish i think it just goes to show how far off their assessment actually was.

which we shouldn't be a surprise by given the flip flopping in assessment that also occurred under ratts.

Ok, look it's pretty straight forward.
You sent an email of compliant, which was fair enough.
Someone involved in public relations gave you a call and told you whaterer bullcrap they thought would help smooth you over and get your money. And that's all it was.
You don't want to admit that you bought it hook, line and sinker coz you then spent thousands more on memberships. But that's just what happened I'm sorry to say.

Lethers was new in the gig and did not have the sway to buck Finnis and terminate Richo. As a measure of Lethers supposed authority, the exact same again happened with Ratts' extension despite Lethers' elevation to COO by that time. Finnis was still in charge.

Ratt's worked with Cho at the Scum, and according to Cho, it was he that initiated courting Ratts. That said, Lethers MO was to grab former staffers of the Hawks premiership machine so Ratts fit the mold.
The support put around Richo, was then seamlessly transferred to Ratts.

 

[Mowman]

so you've selectively quoted the richo part. so i'll address that.

scrappy you must know more than those at the club if you think its rubbish or bullshit.

others know this, but i was called by someone at the club off the back of an email complaint in regards to the richo extension. i was told that lethers doesn't hold back and that if he thought richo wasn't up to it he would sack him now and pay him out, regardless of the extention that he inherited. they then went on to say that lether's thinks richo is a good coach he just needs more support. so they went and got ratts. they were also in the market for 3 decent free agents and had identified issues in list management around trout. also highlighted we have too many poor kicks. they thought with the right support around richo they would play finals. i remember being taken back about how much weight they put on the ratten appointment as senior assistant.

that's their words. not mine. it was their assessment of the football club then.

given you think it's rubbish i think it just goes to show how far off their assessment actually was.

which we shouldn't be a surprise by given the flip flopping in assessment that also occurred under ratts.

Your 1st post the other day was spot on

 

[StCicatriz]

Ok, look it's pretty straight forward.
You sent an email of compliant, which was fair enough.
Someone involved in public relations gave you a call and told you whaterer bullcrap they thought would help smooth you over and get your money. And that's all it was.
You don't want to admit that you bought it hook, line and sinker coz you then spent thousands more on memberships. But that's just what happened I'm sorry to say.

Lethers was new in the gig and did not have the sway to buck Finnis and terminate Richo. As a measure of Lethers supposed authority, the exact same again happened with Ratts' extension despite Lethers' elevation to COO by that time. Finnis was still in charge.

Ratt's worked with Cho at the Scum, and according to Cho, it was he that initiated courting Ratts. That said, Lethers MO was to grab former staffers of the Hawks premiership machine so Ratts fit the mold.
The support put around Richo, was then seamlessly transferred to Ratts.

this was a year into his tenure as footy gm

i love this part:
Someone involved in public relations gave you a call and told you whaterer bullcrap they thought would help smooth you over and get your money. And that's all it was.

like it can't possibly be genuine, because you know better... instead your claim that its bullshit has to be and you have absolutely no proof of that, instead you want to dismiss what someone at the club has actually said

pretty sure you had representatives from the club going on public record stating similar things about richo. from the pres to CEO.

have you got any evidence at all to suggest lethers didn't rate richo during his first 12 months at the club?

Ratt's worked with Cho at the Scum, and according to Cho, it was he that initiated courting Ratts. That said, Lethers MO was to grab former staffers of the Hawks premiership machine so Ratts fit the mold.

so in other words... you're not sure?

 

[sunny3193]

Dard Ball Get
You were correct.
My compliments sir.

 

[Dard Ball Get]

Dard Ball Get
You were correct.
My compliments sir.

Can’t remember the last time I wasn’t, and no compliments necessary, Squire, everything I do is for the good of the forum

 

[ScrappyDo]

this was a year into his tenure as footy gm

i love this part:
Someone involved in public relations gave you a call and told you whaterer bullcrap they thought would help smooth you over and get your money. And that's all it was.

like it can't possibly be genuine, because you know better... instead your claim that its bullshit has to be and you have absolutely no proof of that, instead you want to dismiss what someone at the club has actually said

pretty sure you had representatives from the club going on public record stating similar things about richo. from the pres to CEO.

have you got any evidence at all to suggest lethers didn't rate richo during his first 12 months at the club?

Ratt's worked with Cho at the Scum, and according to Cho, it was he that initiated courting Ratts. That said, Lethers MO was to grab former staffers of the Hawks premiership machine so Ratts fit the mold.

so in other words... you're not sure?

That's ok. You're sure enough for both of us.

 

[pebblesofsand]

I don't get the idea that a guy who works in an office in a bank is automatically a great list manager. You are forecasting youth progression, trying to balance a list on that same formula, selling and buying players within that, woking with several other people to move pieces around, making space to attack free agency etc. It's more alchemy than science. Like the best recruiting managers are a little bit left of centre, you need a lot of intangibles to get it right. Gags sold low and bought high which in the bank he would have got him the arse.

Yeah I agree - thats why you get someone who hasn't just "worked in a bank" but has the AFL cred as well.

40 AFL games, 200+ SANFL games, multiple b&f wins, captain, premiership player - seems a fair start.

People are talking through their a**** if they reckon his skillset didn't fit the position.

The list was in a much better position when he left than when he started so that's all that counts.

 

[Mowman]

everything I do is for the good of the forum

And the forum is much better for it, thank you kind Sir

 

[sunny3193]

And the forum is much better for it, thank you kind Sir

Suck.

 

[Joffaboy]

they either come up through recruiting or player management. gags didnt do either, which is what made it really weird.

the clear majority work their way through recruiting and get promoted. you get the odd one or two jumping straight out of player management. or you get the traineeship type arrangement when the long term list boss is training up his replacement.

Adelaide -> player management -
Brisbane -> experienced AFL recruiter

Collingwood -> experienced AFL list manager
Carlton -> experienced AFL recruiter
Essendon -> AFL development coach + WAFL footy manager
Freo -> experienced AFL recruiter
GC -> experienced list manager
Geelong -> Wells has trained up Mackie over the last 4 years
GWS -> can't find
Hawthorn -> experienced AFL recruiter
Melbourne -> long time in football but was a recruiter prior to becoming list boss
NM -> long time in football mainly assistant coaching
Port -> experience AFL recruiter
Richmond -> long time in footy was at port adelaide moved to tigers to do list analysis then promoted
Sydney -> experienced AFL list manager
WB -> experienced recruiter and been in footy a long time
WCE -> lots of churn here but basically they appointed vozzo who was a player manager... then brady rawlings (now NM).. then Glass (something really weird here happened and there was some rumours) then promoted their long time recruiter... who's now retired.

No point saying 'experienced AFL list manager' what was their background, was it finance, what did they do before List Manager, no such thing as Assistsnt List Manager, so every List Manager had no 'experience' before becoming a list manager.
What was their experience with contracts and dealing with managers, what were their qualifications to do so?
It is bordering on hysterical, the
1. Ignorance of what a list managers KPI's and KRA's are and how they are structured at each club.
2. The criticism.of a List manager that fixed our TPP and who recruited pretty well.

Really nobody has a clue so to keep criticising Gallagher just look totally ignorant and churlish.


On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[StCicatriz]

No point saying 'experienced AFL list manager' what was their background, was it finance, what did they do before List Manager, no such thing as Assistsnt List Manager, so every List Manager had no 'experience' before becoming a list manager.
What was their experience with contracts and dealing with managers, what were their qualifications to do so?
It is bordering on hysterical, the
1. Ignorance of what a list managers KPI's and KRA's are and how they are structured at each club.
2. The criticism.of a List manager that fixed our TPP and who recruited pretty well.

Really nobody has a clue so to keep criticising Gallagher just look totally ignorant and churlish.


On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

My point is they worked in the industry and had experience that related to list management.

Gags has come in cold.

Surely you can see what I'm saying here?

I don't think he "fixed our tpp" reports were we had been banking the tpp in the years leading up to his start. If anything he spent it.

You can't say no one knows what the detail is and then male a blanket statement like he fixed our tpp.

 

[True Believer]

And the forum is much better for it, thank you kind Sir

Kiss-ass........

 

[Dard Ball Get]

Kiss-ass........

Jealousy is a curse, hun x

 

[gringo2011]

Yeah I agree - thats why you get someone who hasn't just "worked in a bank" but has the AFL cred as well.

40 AFL games, 200+ SANFL games, multiple b&f wins, captain, premiership player - seems a fair start.

People are talking through their a**** if they reckon his skillset didn't fit the position.

The list was in a much better position when he left than when he started so that's all that counts.

He's been head hunted has he? Looks like he wasn't that ideal. I'd say that others were probably responsible for the stuff you're crediting him with. Lethers got his mate down, he ended up sacked but somehow we have people scrambling to deify him still.

He paid up big to bring in Hill, Ryder, Howard and Butler at the cost of the draft. That was a misread of how close we were to a flag. That is nearly the worst mistake a list manger can make. Clumsy handling of Luke Dunstan that meant a player didn't want to go back to the club and preferred retiring. We apparently let players go due to having others contracted on longer than necessary contracts so needed spots. he was hardly a brilliant operator.

 

[Joffaboy]

My point is they worked in the industry and had experience that related to list management.

Gags has come in cold.

Surely you can see what I'm saying here?

I don't think he "fixed our tpp" reports were we had been banking the tpp in the years leading up to his start. If anything he spent it.

You can't say no one knows what the detail is and then male a blanket statement like he fixed our tpp.

Cause he fixed the TPP. 95% was needed to be spent, he structured the contracts going forward to allow the money to be banked to the point we could almost land DeGoey.
And not all of them had list management experience at all, and I would bet not one would have the financial acumen Gallagher had.
It is hard to believe that people with no idea of his actual KRA's and what his job entailed from a financial and legal could critisise him. If he was as bad as everyone says he is out TPP would have been shot for years after he was gone, but this is not the case.
Do people think these things just automatically just happen?
And this is not even addressing his drafting and recruitment that was spoken about earlier which is being shown to be very good
Recruits
Jones
Howard
Butler
Hill
Crouch
Higgins

All still in the seniors

Drafted
Ronnie - seniors
Alison - miss
Naz, Windy, Owens - good selections
Pou, Van Es, Hotton, Keeler- tbd but look good

Mid season

Wood, Sharman, Heath.

So 13 from that list are regular seniors players, Wood has been outstanding, Sharman looks really good developing, and Heath has some tools.

Pou, Windy, Owens and Naz could be potential ten year players and potentially all Saints champions.

His tenure was fine, he made some mistakes, but overall did a good job.

But he gets shitcanned because he didn't reach the emolument standards of people who didn't even know the criteria for emolument was.

On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Mowman]

Cause he fixed the TPP. 95% was needed to be spent, he structured the contracts going forward to allow the money to be banked to the point we could almost land DeGoey.
And not all of them had list management experience at all, and I would bet not one would have the financial acumen Gallagher had.
It is hard to believe that people with no idea of his actual KRA's and what his job entailed from a financial and legal could critisise him. If he was as bad as everyone says he is out TPP would have been shot for years after he was gone, but this is not the case.
Do people think these things just automatically just happen?
And this is not even addressing his drafting and recruitment that was spoken about earlier which is being shown to be very good
Recruits
Jones
Howard
Butler
Hill
Crouch
Higgins

All still in the seniors

Drafted
Ronnie - seniors
Alison - miss
Naz, Windy, Owens - good selections
Pou, Van Es, Hotton, Keeler- tbd but look good

Mid season

Wood, Sharman, Heath.

So 13 from that list are regular seniors players, Wood has been outstanding, Sharman looks really good developing, and Heath has some tools.

Pou, Windy, Owens and Naz could be potential ten year players and potentially all Saints champions.

His tenure was fine, he made some mistakes, but overall did a good job.

But he gets shitcanned because he didn't reach the emolument standards of people who didn't even know the criteria for emolument was.

On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

So he was in charge of drafting and talent identification as well ?

All the ones under drafting I would give Toce as well us Sharman

 

[Joffaboy]

He's been head hunted has he? Looks like he wasn't that ideal. I'd say that others were probably responsible for the stuff you're crediting him with. Lethers got his mate down, he ended up sacked but somehow we have people scrambling to deify him still.

He paid up big to bring in Hill, Ryder, Howard and Butler at the cost of the draft. That was a misread of how close we were to a flag. That is nearly the worst mistake a list manger can make. Clumsy handling of Luke Dunstan that meant a player didn't want to go back to the club and preferred retiring. We apparently let players go due to having others contracted on longer than necessary contracts so needed spots. he was hardly a brilliant operator.

All made up. No fact there at all. It's all your skewed opinion and you are still going on about that bust Dunstan.
My God anything you post should be discounted on that alone.
As for the five recruits, they were to fill gaping holes in the list and Ross Lyon still has the four that have not retired still in his first 22. Why hasn't he replaced them all? You reckon they are Gops, why not get other gops to replace them.

You have never worked in a membership organisation or as a list manager and really are totally ignorant. You 'surmise' and you 'think' other did duties without having a clue.
Anyone who thinks Luke Dunstsn was going to take us anywhere should have absolutely no opinion on list management, let alone the financial or contractual side of the job.
Gallagher is gone and SOS looks good so I don't care, but the constant shitcanning of a blokes job that you have never done and you things up about to suit your position is frankly embarrassing for you.


On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app