Joel I didn't hear you complaining about Kosis penalty? There are some real hypocritical barstards on here.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Licuria gets off!
- Thread starter speedy
- Start date
- Tagged users None
surely we don't need anymore proof that the Tribunal is in dissaray, everyone is complaining about the umpires while these *****heads bumble along.
- Jan 13, 2001
- 15,903
- 6,945
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Man City
It proves once again that RL got one thing right and that was their judicary. The AFL is a joke, if this were a real court the'd give someone 15 years for assualt and let a murdered off with community service and a fine.
Bartholin Juice
Club Legend
Agreed... Holland/Williams is another example.
Nonetheless, if Kositzche (sp?) got a week for what looked to be an almost identical indisgression, then Licuria should consider himself, well... perhaps not lucky, but at the very least he's done well.
Don't think either the Licuria incident or Kositzche's incident warranted suspension.
I would have been happy with Kosi getting off but I see your point.
F
Fall Out Boy
Guest
Whilst i agree, did you think Kosi deserved to be suspended?
Good point. Maybe the tribunal are trying not to make the same mistake twice.
yep, because that is the rule.
It just doesn't seem to be applied properly.
the rule itself is suss, but how can they possibly be so inconsistant?
just getting off the subject here check this rotten thing out and try and beat 313.9
you will all hate me for this and good.
http://home.tele2.fr/kcv/pinguin.swf
Kildonan
Premium Platinum
St Kilda have been harshly dealt with season with regards to reports and suspensions. Some of us have had a whinge but most of us have copped it on the chin.
It is disheatening to see almost identical incidents being treated differently.
I'm sure all clubs' supporters would like to see consistency in the tribunal decisions and on what is reported.
The Licuria decision is evidence that we are not getting the consistency that we require. We lose faith in the system and respect for it. No wonder the umpires are abused.
The AFL must act. Get in an outside body to audit the decision-making process and make sure significant guidelines and structures are in place that the inconsistencies are minimalised.
No system is perfect but this one is fatally flawed.
- Banned
- #62
Not really, its justr that he couldnt give a flying **** about as St. Kilda player and honestly why would you?
Well like you he is hypocritical, simple.
you are a footy fan , Right? you are interested in the tribunal outcomes right?
Your player gets off but another doesn't for the same thing but you think thats ok?
Sums you up mate.
Bartholin Juice
Club Legend
Does anyone actually know how the tribunal operates? I mean, when a player has been charged with an offence, what sort of things do they look for in order to judge the alleged offender guilty?
Bartholin Juice
Club Legend
No that involves skill, so I don't see the tribunal using it.
How about a super-duper quantum indeterminacy computer? Push a button and it comes up with guilty or not guilty. Let's just hope that it's not into dialetheism, or else we'll get guilty and not guilty, or neither guilty or not guilty.
Originally posted by The Fireman
just getting off the subject here check this rotten thing out and try and beat 313.9
you will all hate me for this and good.
http://home.tele2.fr/kcv/pinguin.swf
hehehehe nice one Fireman!
First shot 321.1!
Finally some level headed inputOriginally posted by FuManchu
Kosi has longer legs, it looked worse
no wayOriginally posted by Ari
hehehehe nice one Fireman!
First shot 321.1!
save a screen shot??? otherwise I won't believe ya
F
Fall Out Boy
Guest
Do you believe that there is a conspiracy against St. Kilda, or merely that Kosi was unlucky?
- Banned
- #72
Dont be such an idiot.
You are confusing hypocritical with parochial.
I dont give a *** what happens to players on other teams.
Get a life or at least a dictionary.
or that the tribunal is not working properly?
you have been summed up.
Yeah fair enough, it didn't look like an intentional action to and I think he would have been a bit stiff to go, these things happen in the course of play. Ahh the tribunal always brings out the best in this site, the usual chorus of anti-Collingwood stuff, fans banging on about decisions that are long gone etc etc I think we can all just agree that the tribunal isn't perfect and never, ever will be and hell, I'm an Eagles man so I should be probably whinging and wining about Evil Eddie and his tribunal pay offs all night long.....
Similar threads
