Another factor for the Hawks is 4 games in Launceston.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pies drew following crowds recently
88k v Carlton on Sunday with a 3:20 start
71k v Sydney on Sunday with a 3:20 start
66k v Adelaide on Sunday with a 1:10 start
Why do people pretend Sunday arvo is a bad time to draw a crowd?
As a non-Victorian I've never bought into the concept. Regardless of that, I agree with you, however valid it may have been back in the day it is definitely outdated in the modern day AFL competition.Hawks had huge turn outs for MCG games this year.
The only thing that reduced their overall crowd number was the 4 home games in Tassie, which Hawthorn do extremely well out of financially anyway.
The "big 4" is a dead concept and has been for years. I'd rather be West Coast, Geelong or Hawthorn in the AFL era as far as success and financial stability goes.
It looks as though these numbers are inclusive of Gather Round which are supposed to be neutral and not counted as Home or Away games. Both Richmond and Freo has these added in as home game attendances. Freo had a game at Adelaide Oval against Carlton which drew 43158 fans. Richmond had to play St Kilda at Norwood where we got a capacity crowd of 9425. Take these off the total and Richmond had 523405 for their 11 home games and Freo had 518617. So yes, the Big 4 is still the Big 4.Seems the away games don’t tell a full story due to the Big 4 barely travelling and having two sets of fans going to a game.
View attachment 2097922
Looks like there is a new Big 4
Are the AFL sport's creationists pretending to be evolutionists?It’s almost like they were fixtured to do so!
So was there something in Dimma's much derided comment abt Marvel all those years ago?Pies dont get crowds at Marvel
Fremantle can't draw a million through the gate because they don't have enough supporters around Australia, nothing to do with fixturing.Unbelievable? I reckon next year the AFL should give them a leg up and give them all the best timeslots again.
Maybe it might happen again??
Or could the clubs that get shafted take the mantle?
I wonder what the outcome will be?
Adelaide based on what?There are 6 big clubs.
Collingwood , West Coast, Essendon Carlton, Adelaide and Richmond.
5 medium clubs.
Hawthorn, Fremantle, Geelong, Sydney and Brisbane
5 small clubs, Port Adelaide, St Kilda, Melbourne, Bulldogs and North Melbourne
2 micro clubs.
Gold Coast, GWS,
Thats the key point.Fremantle can't draw a million through the gate because they don't have enough supporters around Australia, nothing to do with fixturing.
I posted this in July - but Hawthorn and Adelaide are basically the same size across all metrics.Adelaide based on what?
Pedestrian membership numbers that don't even break 70,000 ever, 7th in average home attendance, revenue that sits at 7th from last year.
So, I'm really struggling to see any metric that would put Adelaide as a "Big" club, enlighten me.
Okay so I had a look into this:
If you break it down into club membership (which is admittedly slanted toward the Melbourne clubs), social media and google trends over a sustained period (say 5 years)
Hawthorn v Adelaide
Facebook: 333,000 v 288,000 (45,000 Hawthorn way)
Twitter: 104,400 v 160,000 (55,600 Adelaide way)
IG: 243,000 v 187,000 (56,000 Hawthorn way)
Tik Tok: 202,400 v 109,300 (93,100 Hawthorn way)
YouTube: 23,400 v 24,300 (900 Adelaide way)
Club Membership: 80,698 v 68,536 (12,162 Hawthorn way)
Perhaps Chief can provide the breakdown of Hawthorn and Adelaide posters?
Last year was Hawthorn’s 3rd best year for club membership (but the first time in 20 years it dropped out of the top 5). At the same time, it was a club record for the Crows.
If you look at google trends (over a five year period), the two are neck and neck - probably closer and more even than any other club:
View attachment 2024287
On first glance I assumed Adelaide would be slightly bigger, but on the data Hawthorn is narrowly in front.
Is it possible for the 5th biggest Victorian club to be larger than the top SA club? Possible but not that believable on first glance, but it does make more sense if you assume Hawthorn has broader support in Tas and interstate.
Adelaide would definitely have more support in SA than Hawthorn in Victoria though (don’t they have 70% of the SA market?)
Thats the key point.
Further, as Lavender Bushranger said, the AFL build the fixture around drawing maximum crowds and this certainly helps the big Victorian clubs draw 1M+. Irrespective, they are the biggest drawing clubs and would still likely draw 1M+ without these additional supporting layers in their fixtures.
That said, it’s a bit rich that it was purported in the same post that Essendon were fed absurd handouts when it was in large part making decisions consistent with its ethos that the big clubs in Victoria in part drive the commercial strength of the game overall. And, the TV revenues in particular are driven by the big clubs fixtures and success, subsidising the growth of the expansion clubs in large part. And this is a good thing!
Finally, Essendon would’ve survived without whatever handouts they received (?) thanks to the support of its high end supporters who continue to quietly invest significant financial support into the club via its capital infrastructure programs. Its’ a club that in fact is currently gutter crawling commercially which reinforces its ability to operate to a satisfactory level without on field success or commercial capability of its commercial team.
So these are arbitrary numbers that mean nothing in isolation.I posted this in July - Hawthorn and Adelaide are basically the same size clubs across all metrics
Hawthorn v Adelaide (to July 2024)
Facebook: 333,000 v 288,000 (45,000 Hawthorn way)
Twitter: 104,400 v 160,000 (55,600 Adelaide way)
IG: 243,000 v 187,000 (56,000 Hawthorn way)
Tik Tok: 202,400 v 109,300 (93,100 Hawthorn way)
YouTube: 23,400 v 24,300 (900 Adelaide way)
Club Membership: 80,698 v 68,536 (12,162 Hawthorn way)
So these are arbitrary numbers that mean nothing in isolation.
Geelong is not a "Big" club, and to be clear this is me being serious Geelong is a mid-strong club.
Yet if I look at your numbers Geelong beats both Adelaide and Hawthorn in 3/6 metrics.
Facebook: 251,500 (less then both)
Twitter: 91,000 (Less then both)
IG: 246,000 (More than both)
Tiktok: 226,000 (More than both)
Youtube: 20,000 (Less than both)
Members: 82,155 (More than both)
What exactly makes Adelaide or Hawthorn I guess a "Big" club, based on the numbers provided?
I agree, that’s true.As I've said in the AFL attendance thread, judging club size by home and away attendance is flawed.
For example, a St Kilda or W Bulldogs drawing 800,000 is far more impressive than an Essendon of Carlton drawing 1 million fans through the gates solely because those clubs only get single games (at Docklands) vs the big clubs and often have to travel to Tasmania, Geelong, Canberra, Darwin and the Gold Coast.
The Victorian clubs are really staggered into the haves, the have nots and the hybrids (Geelong)
As I said in another post, social media numbers are geared to on field success as evidenced by Geelongs relative strength in Instagram and TikTok which are the latest two social media platforms to hit the landscape. I’d suggests the Cats flag in 2022 was the catalyst for a big spike in these platforms in particular.So these are arbitrary numbers that mean nothing in isolation.
Geelong is not a "Big" club, and to be clear this is me being serious Geelong is a mid-strong club.
Yet if I look at your numbers Geelong beats both Adelaide and Hawthorn in 3/6 metrics.
Facebook: 251,500 (less then both)
Twitter: 91,000 (Less then both)
IG: 246,000 (More than both)
Tiktok: 226,000 (More than both)
Youtube: 20,000 (Less than both)
Members: 82,155 (More than both)
What exactly makes Adelaide or Hawthorn I guess a "Big" club, based on the numbers provided?
Fremantle can't draw a million through the gate because they don't have enough supporters around Australia, nothing to do with fixturing.
Incorrect, being fixtured to play Hawks in Launceston and Melbourne in Alice Springs does affect the “overall” crowd numbers.
Which is why the average home ground attendance is far more accurate.
Dockers sit 3rd on home ground attendance (have been in the top 4 most years of late) and are 3rd on the most profitable list. This likely means our quoted membership numbers are actual full fee paying, game attending people - not someone’s goldfish counted under a pet membership !
It’s a new dawn, crank up your AC/DC and jump on the Purple Train !! (Wait…..sorry… train is parked up for repairs at the mo….maybe jump on next year !!)
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com