- Jan 12, 2008
- 8,109
- 8,280
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Fiorentina, Aus. Cricket
It's not. Your reaction is.
Let's agree to disagree then.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not. Your reaction is.
Marshall was very very good. I have him probably second to Michael Holding as best West Indies fast bowlers I seen.For those who saw both, how did Lillee compare with Malcolm Marshall? I've always heard Marshall called the best of the great WI quicks and those two seem to come up most often in discussions of greatest fast bowler of all time.
Marshall was very very good. I have him probably second to Michael Holding as best West Indies fast bowlers I seen.
Andy Roberts and Marshall I rate about the same. Marshall tended to swing it more. Then Joel Garner and then Ambrose.
I have Marshall ahead of McGrath but probably just behind Wasim Akram. Maybe Marshall about same level as Imran Khan. There no much between Imran and Marshall. I'd pick Imran before McGrath too. For me, the best pace bowlers I rate that I seen go in order of Lillee, Hadlee and Wasim Akram. Holding next and not much difference to Marshall at all. All great bowlers.
That ball that bowled Cook in Perth (first ball of the second innings I think) was one of the best deliveries I've seen.Ryan Harris would be in the conversation if his body was even remotely close to durable
That ball that bowled Cook in Perth (first ball of the second innings I think) was one of the best deliveries I've seen.
Ryan Harris would be in the conversation if his body was even remotely close to durable
That ball that bowled Cook in Perth (first ball of the second innings I think) was one of the best deliveries I've seen.
I didn't see Alderman, but I think you're barking if you're picking anyone instead of McGrath.Mitchell Johnson. When he was good he was so damn good. When ordinary very ordinary.
If Johnson was in form I woudl pick him ahead of McGarth,
McGarth was perhaps the best organized and constant fats bowle, generlay very reilable and an 8/10 80% ofthe time. Johnson was 10/10 25% but 3/10 25% of the time and perhrpas 6 the rest,
Johnson a hard player to rate, in Career terms McGarth got him covered easily, but a in form impact Bowler Johnson easily.
If I was touring England and picking players at their peak Alderman better than McGarth.
Whispering Death was the scariest bowler I saw growing up, he was a little robotic like McGrath yet about 15-20 kms faster. Like you I rate him just ahead of Marshall and Roberts with Garner, Ambrose, Croft and Walsh not far behind.Marshall was very very good. I have him probably second to Michael Holding as best West Indies fast bowlers I seen.
Andy Roberts and Marshall I rate about the same. Marshall tended to swing it more. Then Joel Garner and then Ambrose.
I have Marshall ahead of McGrath but probably just behind Wasim Akram. Maybe Marshall about same level as Imran Khan. There no much between Imran and Marshall. I'd pick Imran before McGrath too. For me, the best pace bowlers I rate that I seen go in order of Lillee, Hadlee and Wasim Akram. Holding next and not much difference to Marshall at all. All great bowlers.
Alderman was a nightmare to face in England. I think he twice got over 40 wickets in a series the two times he went there.I didn't see Alderman, but I think you're barking if you're picking anyone instead of McGrath.
Ha ha.Whispering Death was the scariest bowler I saw growing up, he was a little robotic like McGrath yet about 15-20 kms faster. Like you I rate him just ahead of Marshall and Roberts with Garner, Ambrose, Croft and Walsh not far behind.
I just had a look:Alderman was a nightmare to face in England. I think he twice got over 40 wickets in a series the two times he went there.
And 42 and 41 wickets are absolutely ******* amazing, 1981 and 1989 respectively. But McGrath got 36 at 19.47 in 1997, 32 at 16.94 in 2001n and 19 at 23.16 in 2005.
There's also the fact that there's only 10 wickets in each innings available to bowlers, and in the same series McGrath played Warne took 24 at 24.04, 31 at 18.71, and 40 at 19.93. As far as I know, there was no equivalent to Warne in the Australian side at the time for Alderman to compete with.
McGrath would be inside my first 2 players picked for an all time XI, with the first being Bradman.
Don't forget 31 wickets in 1972 as well.One DK Lillie picked up 39 Wickets in 1981.
Don't forget 31 wickets in 1972 as well.
This was just before his back injury, he was a tearaway - fast and ferocious. Many wouldn't know just how quick and intimidating he was at this time.
If I was touring England and picking players at their peak Alderman better than McGarth.
For those who saw both, how did Lillee compare with Malcolm Marshall? I've always heard Marshall called the best of the great WI quicks and those two seem to come up most often in discussions of greatest fast bowler of all time.
For me Lillee & McGrath have been our best 2 quicks since the end of WSC. For me those 2 are hard to split.
Cummins is certainly on track to be mentioned in the same breath at the rate he is going. Could he be the best ?
mcgrath 563 wkts @ 21.64 (124 tests)
lillee 355 wkts @ 23.92 (70 tests) - another 90 wkts @ 23 in 18 unofficial tests
.
Asked this of a friend of mine who has been obsessed since his youth.
He had Marshall out in front of everyone, then Wasim, Steyn, Holding, Lillee, McGrath, Imran. I'm probably missing one or two there that he mentioned. He was clear on Marshall being out in front.
Edit: Alan Donald was in there somewhere.
I agree with him on Steyn too. His strike rate during an era of flat pitches was phenomenal.