If they had no killer instinct to win it when they knew they had the Grand Final at the GABBA then they'll never have it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they had no killer instinct to win it when they knew they had the Grand Final at the GABBA then they'll never have it
Was going for them today.lmao, your quick. Don't like the Lions much do ya?
That Port side were the best or 2nd best team in the comp in each of those years. Brisbane are far from that.The Brisbane Lions of 2019-21 feel a lot like Port Adelaide of 2001-03. Mark Williams and the Power were SLAMMED for being chokers back then after three consecutive top four finishes, two prelim appearances and one straight sets elimination. As a top four team in each of those years, Brisbane have actually performed worse than Port did yet somehow how escape the tag of chokers... How?
If Brisbane do end up securing the number one pick in Will Ashcroft this off season then that might be the difference between a wasted premiership window and clinching one before it's too late.
Were they though? Port got beaten by Collingwood in both '02 and '03, once on their home deck and once at the MCG. You could easily argue Collingwood were in fact the second best team in the league in those years, particularly given they made back-to-back grand finals and Port never made it past a prelim in the 2002-03 seasons. They also went out in straight sets in 2001 so it's hard to argue they were the second best team that year either. Brisbane finished 2nd in 2019 and 2020; does that mean they were the second best team in those years? However you want to look at it, it's a subjective measurement and there will be varying opinions.That Port side were the best or 2nd best team in the comp in each of those years. Brisbane are far from that.
I wonder how this team would fair with Clarkson bringing some ruthlessness or even with a Ross Lyon.
We were, one of the years, maybe 2003 Port Adelaide finished 3 to 4 games clear of the 2nd team at the end of the minor round....we choked come finals.Were they though? Port got beaten by Collingwood in both '02 and '03, once on their home deck and once at the MCG. You could easily argue Collingwood were in fact the second best team in the league in those years, particularly given they made back-to-back grand finals and Port never made it past a prelim in the 2002-03 seasons. They also went out in straight sets in 2001 so it's hard to argue they were the second best team that year either. Brisbane finished 2nd in 2019 and 2020; does that mean they were the second best team in those years? However you want to look at it, it's a subjective measurement and there will be varying opinions.
What's undeniable is this Brisbane side have lost more finals than they should have and concerningly a lot of those games were played at the Gabba. Bringing in Alastair Clarkson and Will Ashcroft this off season would probably change that dramatically, though.
I didn't think the Demons were that much of a grit team a few years ago, so goes to show that it can change around even with largely the same crop.Brisbane can look amazing with the ball at times and have enough talent to play some great high scoring, attacking footy. But they do not have the defensive hard grit edge that teams like the Cats, Tigers, Demons have had in recent years.
If you can't defend, your game doesn't stand up.
A new coach and gameplan and focus on being defensively stout and pressuring all over the ground might turn them around, but it doesn't seem like that's going to happen under Fagan.
You're the second person I've seen mention Brisbane escaping the "choker" tag today. I'm seriously confused, as I actually thought they had definitely been given that tag and all their early seasons wins had a very big asterisk next to them. But maybe I've mistakenly thought there was more coverage saying that?The Brisbane Lions of 2019-21 feel a lot like Port Adelaide of 2001-03. Mark Williams and the Power were SLAMMED for being chokers back then after three consecutive top four finishes, two prelim appearances and one straight sets elimination. As a top four team in each of those years, Brisbane have actually performed worse than Port did yet somehow how escape the tag of chokers... How?
If Brisbane do end up securing the number one pick in Will Ashcroft this off season then that might be the difference between a wasted premiership window and clinching one before it's too late.
Except Chris Scott actually won a flag early.Saying a team has peaked when they are still relevant and there is no dominant opponent is always so odd to me. They aren't my pick for the flag but going by that logic Geelong should've given up years ago.
Collingwood finished 4th in 2002 with 13-9 and 109%, finishing the H&A with a horrible run of form. They were without Buckley and paying somewhere in the ballpark of $5 to beat Port, who had won 18 of their previous 20 games and just knocked off Brisbane the week prior. There was no way they ever should have lost that game on paper.Were they though? Port got beaten by Collingwood in both '02 and '03, once on their home deck and once at the MCG. You could easily argue Collingwood were in fact the second best team in the league in those years, particularly given they made back-to-back grand finals and Port never made it past a prelim in the 2002-03 seasons. They also went out in straight sets in 2001 so it's hard to argue they were the second best team that year either. Brisbane finished 2nd in 2019 and 2020; does that mean they were the second best team in those years? However you want to look at it, it's a subjective measurement and there will be varying opinions.
What's undeniable is this Brisbane side have lost more finals than they should have and concerningly a lot of those games were played at the Gabba. Bringing in Alastair Clarkson and Will Ashcroft this off season would probably change that dramatically, though.
Came here to say this. That 2002 Collingwood side was the least talented GF team I can ever remember. This is why I say that Buckley is underrated when people say Voss and Hird were head and shoulders above him. He took a team of hacks to the brink of a flag in that game against one of the best teams of all time.Collingwood finished 4th in 2002 with 13-9 and 109%, finishing the H&A with a horrible run of form. They were without Buckley and paying somewhere in the ballpark of $5 to beat Port, who had won 18 of their previous 20 games and just knocked off Brisbane the week prior. There was no way they ever should have lost that game on paper.
2003 was very similar, again winning 18 of 20 heading in and finishing 3 games clear of 2nd. Sydney blew them away early in the QF and they never recovered.
Brisbane in contrast while having had impressive seasons - and indeed lost finals at home - none were anywhere near as overwhelming favourites as what Port were. They haven’t been anywhere near as dominant in the H&A.