Everyone deals with loss differentlySome seriously whacky sh*t being thrown around here since yesterday
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Everyone deals with loss differentlySome seriously whacky sh*t being thrown around here since yesterday
Surely Mitchell will have more of a say around the year's end?
Would expect he would be happier to trade out the older players for picks.
And who are our internal leaders to support the full rebuild once we get rid of all of our senior players?
I said do anything to get 2 extra top 10 picks. I didn’t say anything about trading ALL of our senior guys. We have a heap of senior guys on our list.And who are our internal leaders to support the full rebuild once we get rid of all of our senior players?
And who are our internal leaders to support the full rebuild once we get rid of all of our senior players?
Our 2008 premiership list had the following players over 26 years old - Crawford, Bateman, Croad, Dew.
That's it.
Jacobs had retired in March before the season started. We had Guerra and Osborne as 26 year olds.
The emphasis on leadership is not about quantity so much as it is about quality. We will have 17 of the current list 27 or older come 2022. We have plenty of experience. Trading a couple of older/senior guys will not change that.
I reckon a whole lotta people are going to be disappointed and burn the place down when it is just business as usual.Surely Mitchell will have more of a say around the year's end?
Would expect he would be happier to trade out the older players for picks.
Please don’t pretend like that’s the gold standard. We’ve shown time and time again that we value experience and leadership. Clarkson himself has spoken about the value that players post 28 can bring, and that we’re too quick to cast them off.Our 2008 premiership list had the following players over 26 years old - Crawford, Bateman, Croad, Dew.
LOL we have a heap more that 4 on our list, even after we trade out Tom Mitchell & Wingard....
There’s many ways Mitchell can go about things and we’ve won a flag with a very young team. If Mitchell wants to gut and go to the draft, let’s back him in.Please don’t pretend like that’s the gold standard. We’ve shown time and time again that we value experience and leadership. Clarkson himself has spoken about the value that players post 28 can bring, and that we’re too quick to cast them off.
The idea that we will throw that out the window and gut the list to 2004-2008 levels is just plain dumb.
Mitchell himself as a player was someone who was still excelling well into his 30’s.There’s many ways Mitchell can go about things and we’ve won a flag with a very young team. If Mitchell wants to gut and go to the draft, let’s back him in.
Experience just for the sake of experience doesn’t work. Plus the club has made a mess of things post 2016. Will be interesting to see what new ideas or directions Mitchell brings to the table.
I think Clarko ended up being to much on the experience side of things. Either way a lot of changes and options possible at the end of the year now
Clarko is not in charge anymore. And if club believed in his direction he wouldn’t be getting moved on. Given they’ve been talking 5-10 year horizons a more aggressive rebuild could be on table.Please don’t pretend like that’s the gold standard. We’ve shown time and time again that we value experience and leadership. Clarkson himself has spoken about the value that players post 28 can bring, and that we’re too quick to cast them off.
The idea that we will throw that out the window and gut the list to 2004-2008 levels is just plain dumb.
Our 2008 premiership list had the following players over 26 years old - Crawford, Bateman, Croad, Dew.
LOL we have a heap more that 4 on our list, even after we trade out Tom Mitchell & Wingard....
Clarko is not in charge anymore. And if club believed in his direction he wouldn’t be getting moved on. Given they’ve been talking 5-10 year horizons a more aggressive rebuild could be on table.
Please don’t pretend like that’s the gold standard. We’ve shown time and time again that we value experience and leadership. Clarkson himself has spoken about the value that players post 28 can bring, and that we’re too quick to cast them off.
The idea that we will throw that out the window and gut the list to 2004-2008 levels is just plain dumb.
LOL teams are building to win a flag every year mate. The stars aligned for us in 2008. Then things went to shit for us. Then we we’re. You guessed it buddy, building to win more flags.Why would you compare our list to the 2008 team? We weren't building to win a flag at that stage.
And who are our internal leaders to support the full rebuild once we get rid of all of our senior players?
even if you disregard the leadership argument going and getting rid of all of our best players would be stupid
one or two might be beneficial
all of them would be dreadful