Opinion Matthew Nicks: Adelaide's Coach (Part 3) - The Biggest Loser

Is Matthew Nicks the right coach for Adelaide?

  • Firmly yes (I love what I'm seeing)

  • Leaning yes

  • Can't decide either way

  • Leaning no (but don't sack him yet)

  • Firmly no (he should be sacked)


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Huh? He dropped Rachele which was widely criticized. The easy (and correct) decision would have been to let Rachele play.



Weird. Who is he giving the middle finger to and why?




Huh - What the hell does this have to do with the Rachele decision 4 years apart. Stick to the topic.

I'm not getting involved, just wanted to say that I think greycrow was referring to Geelong this year.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Well no. Coaching an AFL club is incredibly tough. There are so many things that go into it. Once again the AFL is littered with coaches who are brilliant tacticians but can't do the other things correctly.

Not sure why so many people on here can't acknowledge that Mathew Nicks is actually really good at several aspects of coaching.



Incorrect. I said it seems smart to idiots. They might have just liked it because they don't like me.
Coaching is hard for those who are incompetent.

Same goes for most jobs.
 
Every year there are 17 incompetent coaches.



Why doesn't it surprise me that you would try and compare most jobs to the AFL landscape!
No, there are not 17 incompetent coaches.

But if a coach can't make finals in 5 years, they are always a failure.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Couldn't have said it better myself.



Righto. If practical means one dimensional and locked in - then yes.



No. Where have I given excuses for Nicks? Would love to see it.
Are you drunk?
Serious question.

If you don't think you have been offering up excuses for Nicks to be coaching, then seriously wtf do you think you are posting?

But he hadn't lost the players... lol.

It's hardly relevant if he can't cosch
 
According to who?

His media is brilliant. We haven't made the finals in 7 years. He has a terrible record.

The media love him or else they would be burying him relentlessly.

I get what you are saying but the media historically has extraordinary leniency for middling clubs. Clubs like St Kilda and Gold Coast cop very little heat despite their horrendous, embarrassing records over the years. The media just doesn't care.

The media are too busy being fixated on the horrible teams (2-3 win seasons) or teams facing scandals like Melbourne. Unless you're a massive Victorian club they'll leave you alone.

I've listened to plenty of the pressers and Nicks never gets asked any serious questions that would require massaging or brilliant media work. It's mostly softballs and non-questions. The only time he has ever really copped heat was over the Rachele situation where he had to face maybe 2 hard questions.

The media sees us as a pretty average club, and when we continue to be pretty average, there's no story, we're meeting expectations, so they don't care.
 
I've listened to his pressers and he's delusional. I cringe whenever he says "we're a good club" when we're obviously not or "we weren't ourselves" when we put in a performance that is par for the course.
 
I just can’t listen, what comes out his mouth is pure rubbish with no content
I don't rate media work as very important in the grand scheme of things. As long as it's not club damaging levels of bad like the Birdbrain/Pyke camp presser. I don't understand how anyone could think Nicks is "brilliant" though. Even if it's meant as "good at scamming the media", why should I applaud that?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Matthew Nicks: Adelaide's Coach (Part 3) - The Biggest Loser

Back
Top