Maxwell - 1
Roughead - reprimand
Won't really be fair if roughead doesn't go for that especially that stevie j did. Maxwell will get 2.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Maxwell - 1
Roughead - reprimand
Stevie J has a record though.Won't really be fair if roughead doesn't go for that especially that stevie j did. Maxwell will get 2.
Johnson could have accepted a reprimand for his but carry over and bad record took it to a one week suspension.Won't really be fair if roughead doesn't go for that especially that stevie j did. Maxwell will get 2.
If that's the only footage available of the Maxwell incident, you couldn't suspend him on it. Surely they'd have to have something else available like they did for Johnson last week?
I,m waiting on Ross Lyons view before I make any judgements
Won't really be fair if roughead doesn't go for that especially that stevie j did. Maxwell will get 2.
Nobody should be suspended for any of the 'incidents' in the game last night.
They were all pissweak, nobody was hurt, none were deliberate thuggery (just a show if strength or niggling) - but they've set the precedent for this crap, and I doubt they'll wise up now.
footage isn't great. Amazing they only have one blurry shot of the incident... how with modern cameras do you get such a poor shot of it?
Hypothetically, if a Hawk's player gets two games, do they miss the GF? That would seem an unfair punishment given if they lost last night they would have an extra and therefore could make it back for the final.
Low impact. Nothing in it
Maxwell doesn't have either a good or bad record.
He either gets nothing or at best he'll get two weeks.
High Contact, Intentional (only due to the Ottens rule), Low Impact - 6 activation points, level 3 ROugh Conduct - which is 325
Down to 243 with a plea
My only issue, firstly I don't think he meant any malice whatsoever - he was clearly trying to block the space and keeping Puopolo away from the ball. To then get assigned 3 activation points (for the intentional aspect) on the back of something which has zero malice is just poor.
FOr mine (at most) that should be negligent, High, low - 4 activation points - level 1 rough conduct which becomes 93 points with a plea
"Puopolo left the field under the blood rule, the Hawks revealing later he received a broken nose. " has to be high contact medium impact now. He ain't getting off.So he smashes a guy in the face, draws blood and he gets zero weeks with an early plea. Holy shit Batman, if I ever go to court can you be my judge?
"Puopolo left the field under the blood rule, the Hawks revealing later he received a broken nose. " has to be high contact medium impact now. He ain't getting off.
Your club let Stevie J down...............................they should have appealed.
He would have got off!
No brains at Geelong.
Roughead looked like nothing in in but after Johnsons last week he could be in trouble. When I saw the replay, it looked like a half bump half push and I was suprised when Dawes stayed down so long. Hopefully just a reprimand
Gibson has no case to answer to. Even the umpire at the time said it was a free kick and nothing else in it
Gibson has no case to answer to. Even the umpire at the time said it was a free kick and nothing else in it
Completely different.Lynch got rubbed out earlier in the season for less.
Completely different.
How so?