Roast Media Shakes Head, Part 7

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.


Another Ken love fest.

"His record over the past decade, given the talent at his disposal, is remarkable"

How does the author miss the blinding obvious in his own article while defending Ken

"For years, Port have been a pretty straightforward side that’s always been missing something – a bit of luck, some poise, a star forward or a coach who could pull a rabbit out of the hat. They have always had a tendency to shoot themselves in the foot. And they have never really been a ‘system’ team"

You know, like a proper coached side would be.
 
"His record over the past decade, given the talent at his disposal, is remarkable"

This sentence just kills me. Ken’s whole set up leans on unsustainable individual brilliance FFS. The article even goes on to say that we’re not really a “system team” I mean there’s a f@&king clue if there ever was one. Not to mention that his record has nothing of note on it apart from a couple of popularity contest wins.

Remarkable? Only in Bizzaro World where it means deplorable.
 
This sentence just kills me. Ken’s whole set up leans on unsustainable individual brilliance FFS. The article even goes on to say that we’re not really a “system team” I mean there’s a f@&king clue if there ever was one. Not to mention his record has nothing on it apart from a couple of popularity contest wins.

Remarkable? Only in Bizzaro World where it means deplorable.

Article jumps all over the place. Talks about the importance of Dixon then states us not having a gun key forward has hurt Hinkley over the journey (also forgetting he had Schulz kicking 49, 66 and 44 from 13-15).
 
I think the issue is just lazy journalism in AFL. The quality of writing/analysis is high school level but because your average reader is a muppet they don’t care - it still sells.

I choose not to believe that not all those in the media are that wedded to Hinkley - I mean for what purpose? Why would this guy support Hinkley?
This sentence just kills me. Ken’s whole set up leans on unsustainable individual brilliance FFS. The article even goes on to say that we’re not really a “system team” I mean there’s a f@&king clue if there ever was one. Not to mention that his record has nothing of note on it apart from a couple of popularity contest wins.

Remarkable? Only in Bizzaro World where it means deplorable.
 
This sentence just kills me. Ken’s whole set up leans on unsustainable individual brilliance FFS. The article even goes on to say that we’re not really a “system team” I mean there’s a f@&king clue if there ever was one. Not to mention that his record has nothing of note on it apart from a couple of popularity contest wins.

Remarkable? Only in Bizzaro World where it means deplorable.
I mean it is remarkably shit that with the lists and support he has had he hasnt got the club to even a single grand final in a decade so I think... technically correct?
 

Another Ken love fest.

"His record over the past decade, given the talent at his disposal, is remarkable"

How does the author miss the blinding obvious in his own article while defending Ken

"For years, Port have been a pretty straightforward side that’s always been missing something – a bit of luck, some poise, a star forward or a coach who could pull a rabbit out of the hat. They have always had a tendency to shoot themselves in the foot. And they have never really been a ‘system’ team"

You know, like a proper coached side would be.

I don't mind the guardian but not when it comes to sports. They're the equivalent of Shaun Micallef as Philip Quist reporting on football. Arty wanks who have no interest in sport whatsoever but try to make themselves sound brainy anyway.
 
This sentence just kills me. Ken’s whole set up leans on unsustainable individual brilliance FFS. The article even goes on to say that we’re not really a “system team” I mean there’s a f@&king clue if there ever was one. Not to mention that his record has nothing of note on it apart from a couple of popularity contest wins.

Remarkable? Only in Bizzaro World where it means deplorable.


I dunno, its pretty remarkable that a team with a Brownlow medallist in the midfield, an afl MVP, an all Australian full forward, all Australian CHB and a player that collected 25 votes couldn't even make a grand final.
 
I don't mind the guardian but not when it comes to sports. They're the equivalent of Shaun Micallef as Philip Quist reporting on football. Arty wanks who have no interest in sport whatsoever but try to make themselves sound brainy anyway.
I really enjoy their cricket coverage, especially their live stuff. They are my go to for a big test series if I can't watch it live.
 
I dunno, its pretty remarkable that a team with a Brownlow medallist in the midfield, an afl MVP, an all Australian full forward, all Australian CHB and a player that collected 25 votes couldn't even make a grand final.

If we had 5 Top-4 finishes, 4 PF losses, 3 SF losses, and 2 EF losses under Hinkley, I would be wondering why we didn’t play in a GF.

But we’ve had 2 Top-4 finishes, 3 PF losses, 1 SF losses, and 1 EF loss. A GF appearance would have been a fluke.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I think the issue is just lazy journalism in AFL. The quality of writing/analysis is high school level but because your average reader is a muppet they don’t care - it still sells.

I choose not to believe that not all those in the media are that wedded to Hinkley - I mean for what purpose? Why would this guy support Hinkley?
Because our current hierarchy, admin and football, keeps us mediocre, which is exactly what AFL House wants. Media representatives depend on open access to the AFL, so toe the company line.
 
Does anyone know what your club has called a press conference today for? Big announcement, or something minor? Cheers.

Grêmio’s president called a press conference today to announce that nothing is changing and to ask for supporters stop complaining (after 2 rounds, we are in the relegation zone for D.III).

Seriously!
 
Last edited:
I don't mind the guardian but not when it comes to sports. They're the equivalent of Shaun Micallef as Philip Quist reporting on football. Arty wanks who have no interest in sport whatsoever but try to make themselves sound brainy anyway.

For Association Football, they are good. Sid Lowe, in particular, is one of the best on Spanish football.
 
port has no SYSTEM is an accurate assessment of this club, we never have had much system it is evident in our style of play we are so unpredictable that every one has already predicted what we are up to and have us completely covered.
THEBRILLIANTMINDOFkernhinkley. What a future we have under his brilliant mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top