Unfortunately you got nothing to back up your claims apart from stats suggesting that Kreuzer got a few more touches with what looks like a fair amount more game time. You have used the words Kreuzer was a lot better second year ruckman (oh and from what I have been able to tell you were the first to bring it up) and I've yet to see it. You haven't show it from stats because a guy like Kreuzer who according to you pretty much solo rucked in 2009 can't be easily compared to someone who spends about 60% of game time in the ruck and i think it is pointless to continue this discussion. Its in the wrong thread. Sorry if i have helped to derail this thread. This is my last post on this.More rhetoric with little substance. All this airy fairy crap about how Grundy is better with nothing, nothing to back it up. Why is it so hard, so frustrating for you guys to just accept that while Grundy may be good, Kreuzer was better at the same point in their careers?