Geoff is his old man and an Australian selector ... helps getting in the team when dads picking the side
factually incorrect
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Geoff is his old man and an Australian selector ... helps getting in the team when dads picking the side
You do know Geoff stopped being a selector before Shaun had even made his first class debut, right?Geoff is his old man and an Australian selector ... helps getting in the team when dads picking the side
Haha, I just looked up that nickname and read the backstory for it for the first time:
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/cricket/gnome-slur-angers-langer-20040216-gdxbei.html
I don't know if it's just the way the article written but this is hilarious.
1. The state-vs-state bs is exactly that, bs. There's no real conspiracy to select only NSW players in the test cricket team, and while Victorians (me included) want more Victorian's to be represented in the test team, most of the best players come from NSW. Just because a few spuds from WA get selected, it doesn't change that fact. Cricket and Rugby are the primary sports in NSW.
Brown Nose Gnome will back hm in
Reported.You should all show respect for our next captain!
When has a top 6 batsmen after 31 tests and an average of 25 gone on to become even a decent batsmen?
I highly doubt a top 6 batsman with an average of 25 would have ever played 31 tests so that's a tough one to answer.
Surely it would be fairer to show his full career rather than just pick from the the years where he struggled.Man people have short memories.
Shane Watson:
2015: 4 tests, average 30.3
2014: 5 tests, average 25.8
2013: 12 tests, average 35.2
2012: 6 tests, average 31.5
2011: 6 tests, average 24.1
33 tests, 1861 runs @ 30.5, from age 30 to 34 as an experienced test cricketer.
But yes, he'd be our saviour.
When Watson first came out of Tassie he was bowling high 130’s of a long runWatson was an excellent bowler but injury took its toll on his body and he became a part timer. He was a bit like Ryan Harris in that he's not that tall but generated his pace from his upper body strength. He suits limited overs bowling a bit like Andrew Tye because he is accurate and ha plenty of variation but when he has to bowl 20 or 30 overs with the batsman not needing to score quickly he's easier to get away bowling 130s.
Out of interest how many Shield games did Marsh play before his test debut and how many since? Do you have that info and his record before/since making his test debut
Can't remember who it was but someone said facing him as a youngster he was actually scary quick.When Watson first came out of Tassie he was bowling high 130’s of a long run
So he’s Jarrad Waite in a pair of whites...
So what does it really say to us all when a player gets one game mid-series and is dropped?
No consistency from the 'selectors' and the brown nosed gnome. That is more damning than anything Mitch Marsh can do or does.
I highly doubt a top 6 batsman with an average of 25 would have ever played 31 tests so that's a tough one to answer.
Man people have short memories.
Shane Watson:
2015: 4 tests, average 30.3
2014: 5 tests, average 25.8
2013: 12 tests, average 35.2
2012: 6 tests, average 31.5
2011: 6 tests, average 24.1
33 tests, 1861 runs @ 30.5, from age 30 to 34 as an experienced test cricketer.
But yes, he'd be our saviour.
Even cherry picking his poorer years, he still averages over 5 runs more an innings than M Marsh.
Would hardly be our savior, but the side would be a hell of a lot better with him in it than the no rounders we select.
Not cherry picking years, those are his last 5 years. He coasted off an excellent 2009 and a good 2010 for a long time.
Part of the problem with Watson is that he made all of his runs as an opener then they shuffled him from 3-6 hoping he'd find a niche that he never found.
Marsh isn't doing enough to stay in the side, but he hasn't averaged 25 the entire time. He started off OK, had a lean run, made a couple of big scores then had a very lean run. Was still averaging 30+ a couple of tests ago. If he'd converted a few of his 40s into big scores early on he would've bought a lot more leeway from his critics even if out of form as he is now. He's kind of the opposite of his brother, makes a lot of scores in the 20s and subsequently averages that. Shaun averages 35 but has very few scores around that mark. 100, 0, 0 will do that.