Rumour Multiple GWS players are set to be suspended to start the 2025 season after distasteful costumes and skits from their post-season function

[Muddiemoose]

if its consistent than yes, You dont think there would be any simulated sex acts from the gay community during or after mardi Gras? Lets fine everyone involved in that event including PM's, CEO's etc for not stopping it.

I mean if someone on the premises wanted to complain they would have every right to lodge one

Just like in this particular instance

 

[Ghost Patrol]

I don't agree with the fines, so everyone else should be fined!
-Anonymous user, Police State.

 

[SC_Power]

Um, I'm pretty a couple of them did

Ah yes, maybe that explains the Hinkley fine.

 

[SC_Power]

I don't agree with the fines, so everyone else should be fined!
-Anonymous user, Police State.

What an odd take.
This is about the AFL, a private organisation, not the government.
If anything, you making the comment trying to discredit opposition is reminiscent of a police state / AFL apologist.

 

[Bluelegs]

Ah yes, maybe that explains the Hinkley fine.

It's never okay for a coach to threaten to '9/11' a player.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

What an odd take.
This is about the AFL, a private organisation, not the government.
If anything, you making the comment trying to discredit opposition is reminiscent of a police state / AFL apologist.

Dude, people are saying they want to fine Mardi Gras because GWS players did some dodgy stuff.

But my comment is reminiscent of a police state?

 

[SC_Power]

Dude, people are saying they want to fine Mardi Gras because GWS players did some dodgy stuff.

But my comment is reminiscent of a police state?

I’ll make comment of their comments when I want to.
Just like everyone make comments about mine when they want to.

As an aside, I wonder how the employees of BF feel about comments like the ridiculous Mardi Gras ones.
They might send them to the AFL, who can suspend football supporter accounts for not meeting their standards.

 

[Bostonian]

Doesn't sound like a private function then does it, genius?

Yes it does.

They didn't see it first hand because they weren't invited to the private function.

You would have thought your big brain could work that one out.

 

[Chief]

Yes it does.

They didn't see it first hand because they weren't invited to the private function.

You would have thought your big brain could work that one out.

If people who weren't invited saw it, it sounds like it wasn't private.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

I’ll make comment of their comments when I want to.
Just like everyone make comments about mine when they want to.

As an aside, I wonder how the employees of BF feel about comments like the ridiculous Mardi Gras ones.
They might send them to the AFL, who can suspend football supporter accounts for not meeting their standards.

You realise that BF has terms and conditions that you have agreed to, and users do get suspended for breaking those terms and conditions, yeah?

 

[Bostonian]

If people who weren't invited saw it, it sounds like it wasn't private.

That's only due to very poor security procedures by the venue.

Doesn't mean it wasn't a private function.

 

[Bostonian]

You realise that BF has terms and conditions that you have agreed to, and users do get suspended for breaking those terms and conditions, yeah?

And we all notice how they get overlooked when mods break them.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

And we all notice how they get overlooked when mods break them.

Yeah but we still get speeding and parking tickets. Just like regular users.

 

[Bostonian]

Yeah but we still get speeding and parking tickets. Just like regular users.

Far less chance of that for you though.

Given how much time you spend on here.

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

Where would this fit in with the right to disconnect laws also?

Entire point of the laws is you are not available 24 hours a day to a company. This seems to me like AFL are saying the players work 24 hours a day for them and therefore can be punished outside of working hours?

Not much of a right to disconnect huh

 

[treeebeard]

That's only due to very poor security procedures by the venue.

Doesn't mean it wasn't a private function.

Irrelevant if it is private. You do dumb shit and get caught, you wear the penalty that the relevant authoritie give you. Just like P Diddy and Epestein.

 

[treeebeard]

Where would this fit in with the right to disconnect laws also?

Entire point of the laws is you are not available 24 hours a day to a company. This seems to me like AFL are saying the players work 24 hours a day for them and therefore can be punished outside of working hours?

Not much of a right to disconnect huh

I'm sure the AFLPA and club legal counsel are all over it. I presume the event was not compulsory attendance though.

 

[SC_Power]

You realise that BF has terms and conditions that you have agreed to, and users do get suspended for breaking those terms and conditions, yeah?

Of course, but I’m talking about the employees.

 

[Bostonian]

Irrelevant if it is private. You do dumb shit and get caught, you wear the penalty that the relevant authoritie give you. Just like P Diddy and Epestein.

Well it is relevant.

Hopefully the business bottom line suffers due to their dickhead employee and they get fired for it.

Teach them to have far more secure systems in place when it comes to how they protect their client's privacy when no crime has been committed.

 

[BF Tiger]

And we all notice how they get overlooked when mods break them.

Then it's just "banter", and whoever was offended should lighten up. Or choose to not engage with that thread/poster/topic/etc.

I wonder if that could be applied in real life?

 

[Bostonian]

Then it's just "banter", and whoever was offended should lighten up. Or choose to not engage with that thread/poster/topic/etc.

I wonder if that could be applied in real life?

Apparently not in this case.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

And we all notice how they get overlooked when mods break them.

It's a private forum!

 

[BF Tiger]

What's the penalty for Eric Bana?

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

And we all notice how they get overlooked when mods break them.

Especially when you tell certain posters of Aboriginal heritage, they should have their kids stolen from them and they dont even get a day off suspension

 

[Bostonian]

It's a private forum.

Very public actually.

You don't even have to sign up to see you at work.