MVP - Geelong vs. Melbourne

[SmothOperRaider]

5 - Scarlett
4 - Selwood
3 - Chapman
2 - Ablett
1 - Mumford

 

[theCATSfromHELL]

5. J Selwood
4. M Scarlett
3. J Corey - Underrated game yesterday IMO
2. C Enright - Likewise
1. S Hogan

 

[Fuzzyash]

5. Selwood
4. Scarlett
3. Chapman
2. Hogan
1. Ablett

 

[BigBadCam]

5: Ablett
4: Chapman
3: Selwood
2: Tenace
1: Mumford

 

[bigcatman]

5 - Selwood - did it when we needed it
4 - Ablett - the lil star
3 - Chappy - i bet everyteam wish they had a chappy
2 - Scarlett - Yet again
1 - Enright - ur the man corey

 

[sarah.13]

5 - Selwood - did it when we needed it
4 - Ablett - the lil star
3 - Chappy - i bet everyteam wish they had a chappy
2 - Scarlett - Yet again
1 - Enright - ur the man corey

I concur with these votes

 

[Cohzee]

1) Selwood
2) Chapman
3) Scarlett
4) Hogan
5) Mumford

Surprising to see Selwood not ranking top 2 from alot of people.

 

[Whiskers]

Ok everyone is aloud an opinion but my opinion of most ppl on this board now is - SHEEP

Bloody sheep honestly, some guy mentions he does not think Ablett was overly good? Ok i'll take his opinion but after that, almost everyone suddenly starts putting Ablett way down on votes, 2, 1 and some giving him 0

Ok sheep it is time to form your own opinion. If anyone did what Ablett did saturday then you would all give him the 5 votes. This is not a handicapped voting system sheepies.

5 - Ablett
4 - Selwood
3 - Scarlett
2 - Chapman
1 - Enright

You could give Ablett 4 or 3 but anything less is insane. Its just when some guy gives an opinion and everyone suddenly follows suit is annoying.

 

[Whiskers]

Im gunna do it, tenace gets a well earned, goodbye vote.

5 Scarlett
4 Selwood
3 Chapman
2 Ablett
1 Tenace

Here is my handicap example.

Ablett then Tenace? Yeah you could almost swap them around huh? Tenace almost showed Ablett up in this OPINION.

 

[Cohzee]

Ok everyone is aloud an opinion but my opinion of most ppl on this board now is - SHEEP

Bloody sheep honestly, some guy mentions he does not think Ablett was overly good? Ok i'll take his opinion but after that, almost everyone suddenly starts putting Ablett way down on votes, 2, 1 and some giving him 0

Ok sheep it is time to form your own opinion. If anyone did what Ablett did saturday then you would all give him the 5 votes. This is not a handicapped voting system sheepies.

5 - Ablett
4 - Selwood
3 - Scarlett
2 - Chapman
1 - Enright

You could give Ablett 4 or 3 but anything less is insane. Its just when some guy gives an opinion and everyone suddenly follows suit is annoying.

Thanks for your opinion, ********.

 

[Ninty]

5. Selwood
4. Ablett
3. Scarlett
2. Hogan
1. Chapman

HM: Tenace... Wait, WTF? Goodbye. oh, and Taylor (the Q9)... He's a gun like always. Love his 50 metre goals.

 

[Belisarius]

5 - Scarlett
4 - Selwood
3 - Chapman
2 - Ablett
1 - Enright

HM - Wojo (please keep him in the side) and Mumford (not there yet but showing plenty).

 

[vealesy]

Here is my handicap example.

Ablett then Tenace? Yeah you could almost swap them around huh? Tenace almost showed Ablett up in this OPINION.

Thats nice mate.

I watch games with expectations. Tenace was brilliant compared to what I expected of him. He deserved a vote for effort.

MVP is based on value.

IMO a finge player who plays like that is of more value than an elite player who has a standard dominant game.

MVP does not mean best on ground, it means most VALUABLE. TENACE HAD VALUE.

and fwiw Id have Hogan ahead of tenace in that game by a long shot, but I as I stated in my original post, it was a good riddance, enjoy retirement, sympathy vote.

As if Ablett won't win it this year anyway.

Untangle your panties.

 

[Go Cats!!]

Wow a few people dont have Selwood on thier list

5. Sewlood
4. Ablett
3. Scarlett
2. Chappy
1. Enright

But really the top 4 were all amazing and either of them would be a deserving BOG.