Re: My Take On watch should happen from here.
I read in one of Sheedy's books about when he applied for the Essendon job. One of the questions they asked was 'We have a skilled core group - what do we need to do to improve?' Sheedy's reply was 'You have no skillful players'. He was saying to the club 'From an outsiders point of view, and from a guy who played in multiple premierships, you are not serious'.
I think we need someone to come into the club (whether as coach or Football manager - preferably as coach) and say 'These players are no good. They need to improve hugely'.
At Richmond, we seem to laud our young players too soon, and are happy to let our old players remain at their current levels. There does not seem to be a drive towards improvement, and if you don't make those improvements - well, "Next!".
For that reason, I think we should target Matthews and Malthouse or Williams as No 1 rather than Hardwick or Buckley. We need someone with authority to stand up to the board and supporters and tell them the hard truths. Tell them publicly, as well. I'd even be happy with Sheedy. I am happy for the coach to bag the players. (Remeber Blight and 'Pathetic Pittman'? Well the Crows won the flag that year). I was not surprised when Malthouse said 'We can't beat Geelong'. That's a message to the supporters that he knows they need to improve, and are trying to. But at least they are realistic about it.
But if we take on another untried 'rookie' - well, the board/supporters/coterie groups will just ignore the hard lessons. It must be someone from outside the Richmond fold.
The best example is when we chose Frawley - it was between him and Tony Elshaugh. Elshaugh was assistant coach at North - reigning premiers. Frawley was assistant coach at Collingwood - spooners. Frawley had also spent his whole life at St Kilda watching the ball fly over his head through the goal - what the hell did he know about success, or how to achieve it?
If we have to pick a rookie - no, dont.
WE HAVE MADE THE FINALS 2 TIMES IN 26 years. WE WERE NOT A SERIOUS THREAT EITHER OF THOSE YEARS. WE HAVE HAD AS MANY HIGH DRAFT PICKS AS ANY OTHER CLUB.
OUR STANDARDS THAT WE ASPIRE TO ARE TOO LOW.
I read in one of Sheedy's books about when he applied for the Essendon job. One of the questions they asked was 'We have a skilled core group - what do we need to do to improve?' Sheedy's reply was 'You have no skillful players'. He was saying to the club 'From an outsiders point of view, and from a guy who played in multiple premierships, you are not serious'.
I think we need someone to come into the club (whether as coach or Football manager - preferably as coach) and say 'These players are no good. They need to improve hugely'.
At Richmond, we seem to laud our young players too soon, and are happy to let our old players remain at their current levels. There does not seem to be a drive towards improvement, and if you don't make those improvements - well, "Next!".
For that reason, I think we should target Matthews and Malthouse or Williams as No 1 rather than Hardwick or Buckley. We need someone with authority to stand up to the board and supporters and tell them the hard truths. Tell them publicly, as well. I'd even be happy with Sheedy. I am happy for the coach to bag the players. (Remeber Blight and 'Pathetic Pittman'? Well the Crows won the flag that year). I was not surprised when Malthouse said 'We can't beat Geelong'. That's a message to the supporters that he knows they need to improve, and are trying to. But at least they are realistic about it.
But if we take on another untried 'rookie' - well, the board/supporters/coterie groups will just ignore the hard lessons. It must be someone from outside the Richmond fold.
The best example is when we chose Frawley - it was between him and Tony Elshaugh. Elshaugh was assistant coach at North - reigning premiers. Frawley was assistant coach at Collingwood - spooners. Frawley had also spent his whole life at St Kilda watching the ball fly over his head through the goal - what the hell did he know about success, or how to achieve it?
If we have to pick a rookie - no, dont.
WE HAVE MADE THE FINALS 2 TIMES IN 26 years. WE WERE NOT A SERIOUS THREAT EITHER OF THOSE YEARS. WE HAVE HAD AS MANY HIGH DRAFT PICKS AS ANY OTHER CLUB.
OUR STANDARDS THAT WE ASPIRE TO ARE TOO LOW.