Mr Eagle
Bird-brain
I was in the briefing session last night. the reason why there's no gold coast in the logo is because people already associate our club with being from the gold coast, so they wanted to build a strong brand around the suns. they mentioned GWS, and how they pivoted their brand away from greater western sydney, since no-one associates themselves from being from greater western sydney, they say they're from Parramatta or Blacktown, etc. GWS only has the G and Giants in their logo as that's the brand they want to push and be known as, so similarly for the suns there wasn't a strong need to keep the gold coast in the primary logo. they did show some other variants of the logo that do include gold coast in it that they can use from time to time.
"The Giants pivoted away from "Greater Western Sydney" because it was an overly-long made-up descriptor of the region that no one personally associates with or feels anything for... so we're going to do the same thing for the completely opposite reason.”
I would have understood an argument that they're struggling to differentiate themselves from the Titans in people's minds when someone says "Gold Coast", so they want to make the Suns name more prominent. But removing the GC name altogether from your primary logo just screams lack of civic pride.
(I do also find Hawthorn's logo annoying on this issue, but they can at least argue that their fan base has gone way beyond the suburb)