-
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
New Zealand's tour of India (3 ODIs & 3 T20s)
- Thread starter Plugger35
- Start date
- Tagged users None
4/89, NZ are in deep shit.
Plugger35
Umpiring Expert
- Sep 27, 2008
- 140,087
- 162,224
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Black Caps, Sea Eagles, Subiaco
- Thread starter
- #29
Kuldeep swinging the match back India's way getting the wickets of Nicholls and Mitchell.
Then Phillips smashes him for six off just his second ball, a good innings from him could swing it back NZ's way.
Then Phillips smashes him for six off just his second ball, a good innings from him could swing it back NZ's way.
Feel like 320-330 will be par for the wc.
Dew will be impacting the games, already suggestions the game should start earlier to reduce it's impact.
I think we'll see multiple players scoring a double century in odi's in India. I'm glad Shubman did it with a great SR.
Dew will be impacting the games, already suggestions the game should start earlier to reduce it's impact.
I think we'll see multiple players scoring a double century in odi's in India. I'm glad Shubman did it with a great SR.
Unfortunately Sky and Kishan didn't help their chances of cementing an XI spot today. Sky had a good start but couldn't convert.
Possible WC team
1. Gill
2. Rohit (C)
3. Kohli
4. Iyer
5. KL (WK)
6. Pandya
7. Jadeja* otherwise Axar
8. Axar
9. Kuldeep
10. Siraj
11. Bumrah* otherwise Shami
* pending injury
A few options for India depending on the balance between seamers/spinners & low order batting. Playing 3 genuine seamers would make the tail pretty long. I prefer rolling the dice with 3 spinners, especially considering Hardik can play the 3rd seamer role & it lengthens the batting.
Possible WC team
1. Gill
2. Rohit (C)
3. Kohli
4. Iyer
5. KL (WK)
6. Pandya
7. Jadeja* otherwise Axar
8. Axar
9. Kuldeep
10. Siraj
11. Bumrah* otherwise Shami
* pending injury
A few options for India depending on the balance between seamers/spinners & low order batting. Playing 3 genuine seamers would make the tail pretty long. I prefer rolling the dice with 3 spinners, especially considering Hardik can play the 3rd seamer role & it lengthens the batting.
Plugger35
Umpiring Expert
- Sep 27, 2008
- 140,087
- 162,224
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Black Caps, Sea Eagles, Subiaco
- Thread starter
- #36
A great hundred from Bracewell off just 57 balls.
I said if he could turn his fifty into a hundred we might be a chance and we are.
He probably needs to turn it into a 150 for us to win.
I said if he could turn his fifty into a hundred we might be a chance and we are.
He probably needs to turn it into a 150 for us to win.
Plugger35
Umpiring Expert
- Sep 27, 2008
- 140,087
- 162,224
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Black Caps, Sea Eagles, Subiaco
- Thread starter
- #37
Santner smashes a four to bring up his 50 and a 150 run partnership with Bracewell.
65 runs needed off 36 balls, not impossible with how these two are going.
65 runs needed off 36 balls, not impossible with how these two are going.
Plugger35
Umpiring Expert
- Sep 27, 2008
- 140,087
- 162,224
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Black Caps, Sea Eagles, Subiaco
- Thread starter
- #38
A big over from Siraj getting the wickets of Santner and then Shipley.
Looking like a tough ask now but there's still some hope with Bracewell still there.
Looking like a tough ask now but there's still some hope with Bracewell still there.
Plugger35
Umpiring Expert
- Sep 27, 2008
- 140,087
- 162,224
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Black Caps, Sea Eagles, Subiaco
- Thread starter
- #42
Bracewell given out lbw, he reviewed it but that looked plumb.
A shame he couldn't get us over the line, it would have been one of the greatest comebacks of all time from 131/6, still a great innings from him.
A shame he couldn't get us over the line, it would have been one of the greatest comebacks of all time from 131/6, still a great innings from him.
Not sure how much is being made about it but Kishan's blatant cheating was gross to see.
Plugger35
Umpiring Expert
- Sep 27, 2008
- 140,087
- 162,224
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Black Caps, Sea Eagles, Subiaco
- Thread starter
- #47
I don't recall NZ fans still whinging about that Haddin cheating controversy, I had actually forgotten about it, but what Haddin did was more blatant than what Latham did. Haddin's gloves were in front of the stumps when he took the ball and it was clearly not out while Latham's gloves were still behind the stumps and it was hard to tell if it was the ball that clipped the bails or it was Latham's gloves that clipped the bails.
The third umpire after numerous replays ruled that it was the ball that clipped the bails and not Latham's gloves but it could have gone either way.
The Indian commentators weren't happy with it and criticised him for it, I think he did it as a joke after the controversy with the Latham stumping in India's innings but he still went through with the appeal and the umpires had to review it which showed that he had deliberately knocked the bails off.
- Jul 31, 2010
- 8,839
- 12,245
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- S'roos, New Jets, Cronulla
- Moderator
- #48
Having the "privilege" of speaking regularly to some kiwis I can tell you they're still whinging about it.
Like with all their whinges about Australia they will conveniently be able to justify when a NZer does the same thing just as you have done here.
Plugger35
Umpiring Expert
- Sep 27, 2008
- 140,087
- 162,224
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Black Caps, Sea Eagles, Subiaco
- Thread starter
- #49
It wasn't the same thing as Haddin's gloves were in front of the stumps and Latham's weren't, even the third umpire mentioned that Latham's gloves were behind the stumps when he was making his decision and that was a factor in him giving it out, if they were in front it would have been not out.
Similar threads
