Off The Couch
TheBrownDog
- Oct 4, 2007
- 51,003
- 68,481
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
incorrect on both counts buddy.
Well there you go, learn something new every day
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
incorrect on both counts buddy.
Um.WADA have the power to summon witnesses - alvi, dank and charters will need to appear to start with.
essendon will have to show what was injected - "we don't know what it was, but we do know it wasn't TB4" won't cut it.
WRONG!!!!WADA have the power to summon witnesses - alvi, dank and charters will need to appear to start with.
essendon will have to show what was injected - "we don't know what it was, but we do know it wasn't TB4" won't cut it.
No point appealing to the AFL when you don't trust them.No point appealing when you're case is a steaming pile of shit.
Wasn't that shipment based on Alavi testimony? Is that allowed in the CAS? I didn't think they allowed hear say?CAS will set the bar of comfortable satisfaction much lower as they often do. That Chinese Shipment that the Tribunal couldn't find to be comfortably satisfied was TB4 is a alot more likely to find comfortable satisfaction at the CAS. That's all it'll take. WADA appeal about 40 cases a year on average and CAS have certainly overturn quite a few "home town decisions" in the past.
They'll appeal alot more of Danks judgement too. A few of those were blatantly wrong, especially the not guilty on attemting to adminsiter TB4 to the players. We know he injected the players with whateverrt was in that chinese shipment. Also, after Bomber's interview on 3aw we know hexarelin was on the club's premises despite Dank being cleared of that.
It's possible (not necessarily so though) a CAS decision could be embarrassing for the AFL Tribunal.
You're gonna have to round that down a bit. I actually don't know which side you're referring to.
WADA OTT OOGA BOOGA!
Bunch of ******* clowns
incorrect on both counts buddy.
may know well before that. From memory WADA didn't take their full allotment to concede in the NRL case
It's WADA time!
Yeah... its that simple. If they prove there was a shipment ... should be a formality that all the 34 players were personally injected with that shipment one by one. There is no chance at all if they prove the shipment existed that the drugs didnt go to the Bikies, Gym Junkies or to the legit clinics that this criminals run.CAS will set the bar of comfortable satisfaction much lower as they often do. That Chinese Shipment that the Tribunal couldn't find to be comfortably satisfied was TB4 is a alot more likely to find comfortable satisfaction at the CAS. That's all it'll take. WADA appeal about 40 cases a year on average and CAS have certainly overturn quite a few "home town decisions" in the past.
They'll appeal alot more of Danks judgement too. A few of those were blatantly wrong, especially the not guilty on attemting to adminsiter TB4 to the players. We know he injected the players with whateverrt was in that chinese shipment. Also, after Bomber's interview on 3aw we know hexarelin was on the club's premises despite Dank being cleared of that.
It's possible (not necessarily so though) a CAS decision could be embarrassing for the AFL Tribunal.
Like those witnesses that suddenly refused to testify. Won't be happening at cas.Yeah look out for WADA... they must have that smoking gun that ASADA didnt have. Game over mate... ASADA's case was non-existent... and WADA will take on this evidence, so good luck with that. BOOM!
Wasn't that shipment based on Alavi testimony? Is that allowed in the CAS? I didn't think they allowed hear say?
Why will they suddenly appear?Like those witnessesthat suddenly. refused to testify. Won't be happening at c as.
keep hopingWADA came down with iron fist on the 3 game suspensions handed out to NRL players, i'd expect nothing less here.
Ahh it was Charters then. Still his evidence saying it was for Essendon is inadmissible I thought?Charter knows what he was sourcing, Chinese company certified it, and you don't get that wrong in China without significant penalty, as it was tested at Melbourne Uni as TB4. Enough there for some Panels for be comfortably satisfied you'd think. Not saying it will be but it is certainly very possible the CAS could be comfortably satisfied as their bar of that is traditionally lower.
You mean the convicted drug dealer and the dodgy doc.. yeah I am sure that they dont have agendas... and that their evidence and credibility wouldnt be questioned at all...Like those witnessesthat suddenly. refused to testify. Won't be happening at c as.
Why will they suddenly appear?
You do know the difference between an independent tribunal, as exists in Many countries and one set up by the AFL.It was an independent tribunal you know that?
By who?Because they can be made to.
Stoppit directly! I keep reading your posts seriously and start mentally composing a reply ... Then I go 'hang on'.Yeah... its that simple. If they prove there was a shipment ... should be a formality that all the 34 players were personally injected with that shipment one by one. There is no chance at all if they prove the shipment existed that the drugs didnt go to the Bikies, Gym Junkies or to the legit clinics that this criminals run.
Simple... case closed... players will get 2 years the minute WADA appeal. if only they took the deals that McD offered a year back...
Is that the part where the AFL instructed them to come up with a not guilty verdict no matter what.‘In the interests of transparency, I would welcome the fullest possible release of the Tribunal’s findings and reasons on all of these matters,’ said Mr McDevitt.
that seems to imply that the tribunal is withholding part of the judgment