So Hawks have won 5 out of their last 6. Did not see that coming.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I thought (perhaps wrongly) that you can't have a free paid down ground after disposal when the ball goes out on the full or through for a scoreDuck Ginnivan.....free
Throw the head back Newcombe.....free
Flop Sicily.....free
Breust..... goal
Ahh to support a Victorian team.
Should be six in a row, that Port game still pisses me off.So Hawks have won 5 out of their last 6. Did not see that coming
Same. Port the most arsey team in the comp with the shittest goal this season so far.Should be six in a row, that Port game still pisses me off.
That's what I thought also...... commentators seemed to think it was correct and that the free is paid where it crossed the line.I thought (perhaps wrongly) that you can't have a free paid down ground after disposal when the ball goes out on the full or through for a score
Given that 'the mark' is off the oval
Instead recipient gets offered the result of the original kick (goal, point, OOF) or can take it from where the infringement occurs.
Should be six in a row, that Port game still pisses me off.
They learnt from itAt least the didn't drop their guard after that game. They moved on from it quickly.
Yep that was my understanding of the rule too, I'm sure I've seen it adjudicated that way before.I thought (perhaps wrongly) that you can't have a free paid down ground after disposal when the ball goes out on the full or through for a score
Given that 'the mark' is off the oval
Instead recipient gets offered the result of the original kick (goal, point, OOF) or can take it from where the infringement occurs.
& they shouldn't have lost the 6th game to Port...So Hawks have won 5 out of their last 6. Did not see that coming.
I don't think this is true.& they shouldn't have lost the 6th game to Port...
Their list is much worse than ours, yet their coach is getting the most out of his team.
The Crows hierarchy should compare the respective performances to realise wtf are we doing!
Talls for starters.I don't think this is true.
Their KPPs are a bit suspect (especially down back) but, otherwise, they have a good balance of a gun midfield (Day/Worpel/Newcombe/D'Ambrosio on the wing), dangerous small forwards (Moore/Ginnivan) and reliable small-medium defenders (Sicily/Weddle/Scrimshaw/Jiath).
On what metric is our list better?
SnapAnother game ruined my umpiring.
Surprise surprise, a Victorian team benefits again and a Non-Vic team cops the raw end.
If giving it and the win to north means no front ended PP this year i will very much live with itAnother bad decision decides the game.....surprise surprise it's a Vic team over a non-vic team.
Just this round?Umpiring is an absolute shambles this round.