Oppo Camp Non-Eagles Discussion

[garlic munchers]

Fyfe and Walters come together……

 

[SumaGodCoach]

In the first quarter Nick Daicos wasn't called for a blatant throw that led to a Collingwood center clearance. Then at the end of the quarter Jye Amiss gets pinged for a ludicrously soft free that leads to a Collingwood goal with 5 seconds left on the clock. Vic clubs are so used to getting the rub of the green that they just can't comprehend it when it goes the other way.

 

[KERRPOW]

View attachment 1999471
In the first quarter Nick Daicos wasn't called for a blatant throw that led to a Collingwood center clearance. Then at the end of the quarter Jye Amiss gets pinged for a ludicrously soft free that leads to a Collingwood goal with 5 seconds left on the clock. Vic clubs are so used to getting the rub of the green that they just can't comprehend it when it goes the other way.

A rational pie.supporter.....ive.seen it all now.

 

[Get_The_Gaff]

The same team who had a rarely called free kick for running too far in their favour to help win the game last week are completely losing their shit when the flip side of the coin lands the next week

 

[Get_The_Gaff]

Also Jackson goes to shit in my supercoach team every time Sean Darcy

4

Sean Darcy

Age

26

Ht

203cm

Wt

111kg

Pos.

Ruck

Career

Season

Last 5

D

10.1

3star

K

3.4

1star

HB

6.6

4star

CL

2.4

4star

HO

28.8

5star

D

6.8

1star

K

2.0

1star

HB

4.8

3star

CL

1.8

4star

HO

20.3

5star

D

11.4

3star

K

4.6

2star

HB

6.8

5star

CL

2.6

5star

HO

32.0

5star

plays

 

[Forward Press]

To be fair to Collingwood though (lol), is this even a rule? Yet to have someone point it out in the rulebook.

 

[ioppolo]

To be fair to Collingwood though (lol), is this even a rule? Yet to have someone point it out in the rulebook.

Someone on the main board pulled it up, it's actually a rule as it turns out.

 

[timeforanother22]

What was with the touched goal that wasn’t brought back???

 

[Keys]

If I had a drink every time I’ve heard 6 under 10 games tonight I would currently be on my way to hospital

McRae running with it like his life depends on it in his press conference

 

[timeforanother22]

Someone on the main board pulled it up, it's actually a rule as it turns out.

Well not really. It has to be deemed as time wasting to fit in with the rules?

 

[Bleedblueandgold]

Just saw the Mason Cox

46

Mason Cox

Age

33

Ht

211cm

Wt

110kg

Pos.

F/R

Career

Season

Last 5

D

8.7

2star

K

5.2

2star

HB

3.5

3star

M

4.0

4star

T

1.6

4star

G

1.2

4star

D

6.0

1star

K

3.0

1star

HB

3.0

2star

M

2.3

2star

T

0.3

1star

G

1.0

4star

D

9.0

3star

K

5.4

2star

HB

3.6

3star

M

2.6

3star

T

2.4

4star

G

1.8

5star

knee injury.
Not too fond of the bloke, but that looked incredibly sickening. Hope that it's not as bad as it looked.

 

[Forward Press]

Someone on the main board pulled it up, it's actually a rule as it turns out.

If it's the 'hands the ball to another player' it is clearly in the context of general play and not at a stoppage.

 

[Forward Press]

Well not really. It has to be deemed as time wasting to fit in with the rules?

Yes, it has to fit into some kind of time wasting offence but no one has identified it in the book for me yet.

I'm with Hodgey on this one - some kind of common sense has to occur here. The ball was long dead, time was not running, all players were ready to go again.

 

[Bender_]

Just saw the Mason Cox knee injury.
Not too fond of the bloke, but that looked incredibly sickening. Hope that it's not as bad as it looked.

He got up and strolled off. Was subbed out immediately I think due to the time left in the game but looked worse than it was.

 

[Forward Press]

18.13 (d) must be what they are going for but is it time wasting if the ball was given to a nearby player who then gives it to the umpire when it's already been dead for several seconds?

 

[Bender_]

View attachment 1999526

18.13 (d) must be what they are going for but is it time wasting if the ball was given to a nearby player who then gives it to the umpire when it's already been dead for several seconds?

Er, wouldn't it just be B?

 

[Forward Press]

Er, wouldn't it just be B?

No, because clearly that's in the context of general play (ie letting your teammate grab the ball from your hand when in play). Otherwise that free kick gets paid every time the opposition has possession when a free kick is given to the other side and they give it back. If they get cute about returning the ball directly, D kicks in as a time wasting offence.

 

[InTheWings]

Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[WCErevival]

Why is it a rule though? Seems pointless.

 

[Mr Eagle]

Why is it a rule though? Seems pointless.

To annoy Collingwood fans. Which is always meritorious.

 

[Ghossein]

The rule is there to avoid players time wasting, i.e. a team gets a free kick and a player spends a good 5-10 seconds not giving the ball back to let their teammates flood the defense

The rule was never intended to penalise a player for causing a microsecond delay at a stoppage

 

[xLeCrAs2x]

The irony of Collingwood supporters having a cry about being on the receiving end of a free that’s hardly ever paid just a week after the they were gift wrapped a win from a free kick that’s hardly ever paid..

 

[Bender_]

No, because clearly that's in the context of general play (ie letting your teammate grab the ball from your hand when in play). Otherwise that free kick gets paid every time the opposition has possession when a free kick is given to the other side and they give it back. If they get cute about returning the ball directly, D kicks in as a time wasting offence.

How's it clearly in the context of general play? It makes no reference to it whatsoever in the screen grab you've provided.

 

[FKASC]

Er, wouldn't it just be B?

Pretty sure we did B in the melb match last weekend. Can’t remember who it was but they just grabbed the footy out of a bloke’s hands and ran off.

 

[Ghossein]

How's it clearly in the context of general play? It makes no reference to it whatsoever in the screen grab you've provided.

Because in your interpretation any time a player gives the ball to a player who's received a free kick, it's also another free kick?