I don't think anyone expects that of you. How weird!West Coast having a coach with a full sleeve tattoo that looks like he would threaten front service workers is a rubicon I didn’t expect to cross this year
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think anyone expects that of you. How weird!West Coast having a coach with a full sleeve tattoo that looks like he would threaten front service workers is a rubicon I didn’t expect to cross this year
He had two. Marchbank for the vast majority of it and Saad for parts, who is very undersized for him.Don’t agree. He had multiple opponents.
So at no time he had Weitiring ?He had two. Marchbank for the vast majority of it and Saad for parts, who is very undersized for him.
Like he's good. But he was playing on players most people would expect him to beat b
If he did it was fleeting. Weitering mostly played loose.So at no time he had Weitiring ?
Mate somehow me saying he hadn't proven anything 2 years ago turned into me saying he'd never been any good.Where did I say that? Massive overreaction. I just said that his direct opponent for the majority of the game was a fringe AFL player.
Mate somehow me saying he hadn't proven anything 2 years ago turned into me saying he'd never been any good.
Good luck
I do think I've now got a bet about JUH not kicking 50 goals with someone on here.It’s the best thing about this forum.
Thinking Tsatas could use a run in the VFL to try and improve his kicking after a few long term injuries = writing off his entire career apparently
I think the words were “trade bust” bud.Mate somehow me saying he hadn't proven anything 2 years ago turned into me saying he'd never been any good.
Good luck
Yes but what you think and what is reality don't match.I think the words were “trade bust” bud.
So you’re denying you said it ?Yes but what you think and what is reality don't match.
Am I denying I said he was a trade bust?So you’re denying you said it ?
If I could be ****ed finding it, I’d have a search. Anyway, the bloke is a ****ing gun, he’d walk into any side, the talent was painfully obvious from day one. Yes, I’ve been on his bandwagon from day one. You’ve taken every chance to bring him down . Love watching him go about his buisness, it’s ok, you can join in. It’s ok boncer34, you can be wrong once in your life.Am I denying I said he was a trade bust?
100%
Is this the part where you gleefully misquote me again?
I'm happy to admit he's been better than I thought he would be.If I could be ****ed finding it, I’d have a search. Anyway, the bloke is a ****ing gun, he’d walk into any side, the talent was painfully obvious from day one. Yes, I’ve been on his bandwagon from day one. You’ve taken every chance to bring him down . Love watching him go about his buisness, it’s ok, you can join in. It’s ok boncer34, you can be wrong once in your life.
If it wasn’t you , it was someone with a very similar username ! I think we can move on and both enjoy watching him. Naughton being out probably helped him on Saturday.I'm happy to admit he's been better than I thought he would be.
Are you happy to admit I never said he was a bust? Or are you unable to admit when you're wrong?
If it wasn’t you , it was someone with a very similar username ! I think we can move on and both enjoy watching him. Naughton being out probably helped him on Saturday.
b35 is actually really easygoingBloody boncer33, always getting boncer34 in trouble.
Magpies burnt on Schulz and Ginnivan future pick swaps
How fantastic is this? Because the Pies aren't as good as they thought they were, they may end up paying pick 4 equivalent (or higher) for Lachie Schulz.
And coming out behind on the pick swaps around the Ginnivan deal.. ie paying to give him away.
LOL, they thought it was their incredible spirit and culture. Turns out it was just plain old good luck! And now it's run out.
It is simple. If the AFL give him 3 weeks and he gets off at the tribunal then the AFL can still say they have done all they can to prevent concussions . If it end up in court they now have an out .Geez that charlie cameron tackle getting three weeks blows my mind. Are the AFL suggesting you just don't take a player to ground at all now? There wasn't a slinging action, it wasn't the classic dumping/spear tackle (unlike his previous charge which he shouldve been suspended for). This was a one action, good hard front on tackle.
Geez that charlie cameron tackle getting three weeks blows my mind. Are the AFL suggesting you just don't take a player to ground at all now? There wasn't a slinging action, it wasn't the classic dumping/spear tackle (unlike his previous charge which he shouldve been suspended for). This was a one action, good hard front on tackle.
Both upheld.Bedford and Cameron .. both ridiculous decisions