67% drafted...View attachment 2036174
Laughs giddily...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
67% drafted...View attachment 2036174
Laughs giddily...
True. Good point.67% drafted...
I'm actually staggered how flippantly oppo fans say things like "... and we'll target a top end KPF through trade or FA" as if it was some regular, run of the mill occurance. Happens like one every 5 years across the league.True. Good point.
View attachment 2036174
Laughs giddily...
WC aren't coming out of this quagmire before the Tassie compromised draft and there's little chance of them rebuilding for years after that. I for one look forward to them sucking shit for a decade.
Be a fair chip given the differences between an Optus gate receipt vs one of those clubs.Just waiting for them to ‘sell’ their home games to Collingwood and Richmond at the MCG.
In all seriousness the AFL will probably chip and give the games to Gold Coast or GWS - anything to help out the clubs they made it impossible to not succeed yet haven’t succeeded anyway.
Last caller is something else
The last caller sounds suspiciously like Dan Const from backchatStill laughing at this. They didn't even have the best team on paper when they won in 2018, they got very lucky Richmond choked in the prelim.
Still laughing at this. They didn't even have the best team on paper when they won in 2018, they got very lucky Richmond choked in the prelim.
Any club that owns pokies and has a debt like that should fold.While North are absolute crabs I give them kudos for being debt free and have received about 20million dollars less (since 2012) than the Saints. Who are still like 4 million in debt or something. Would like to see one of them kicked to the VFL but anyways... Let's get an extra home game!
Am I the only one that thought Essendon’s
Deliberate behind was actually there?
No pressure. Geelong players didn’t push and stayed away. The player had time to move the ball. Pretty clear what he was doing
What is the rule?
I think it is this
If you are within 15m's from goal, and under any pressure you can concede.
Nope. 9m aka the length of the goal square.
There needs to be an AFL dance called back to the nine.Nope. 9m aka the length of the goal square.
The whole approach was wrong with the rule. It was brought in after the Joel Bowen time wasting incident: If that was all they wanted to deal with then they should have just made the rule "Any rushed behind that is clearly the result of intent to waste time is a free kick" and if that's too subjective for them then something like "You can't intentionally rush a behind a) from outside the 9 metre zone or b) at all from a kick in phase of play until the phase is ended either by a score at the other end or the opposition side gain possession of the ball."I agree. Was more deliberate than ANB's which cost them the game V Brisbane.
The whole deliberate rule is a complete and utter joke. What the **** is "insufficient intent" anyway? Do away with it entirely. I see zero value in it whatsoever. A sufficient penalty for deliberately putting the ball through the opposition goals is the addition of 1 point to their score.