Non-lions discussion 2020

Remove this Banner Ad

I’m wading into conspiracy territory here but I still wonder about the rumours re Eddie pushing for beams and paying off gambling debts. Has anything about the validity of this been proven?

my conspiracy is Eddie did indeed do both, the afl investigated the gambling debt and recently mandated the value had to come from salary cap, hence the strange recent trade period. And the board have used this a leverage to get Eddie to leave.

no doubt my imagination is in overdrive and I’m 100% wrong. Just find it all odd.
I do wonder whether Eddie saw the writing on the wall and got ahead of it by publically resigning garnering goodwill from the Collingwood by spinning his usual narrative of what he's done for Collingwood whilst ignoring a lot of what has gone wrong in recent years. There has been a strong push by some consortium (probably the wrong word) that is looking to overthrow Eddie and gathering serious momentum that he knew was gone and didn't want to publically lose face, which would be so Eddie, so he pulled up stumps before they got him. That way his legacy isn't tarnished and he goes out on his terms and he'll forever and a day spout how he served the Collingwood Football Club for 23 years without being overthrown etc., etc., etc.
 
I’m wading into conspiracy territory here but I still wonder about the rumours re Eddie pushing for beams and paying off gambling debts. Has anything about the validity of this been proven?

my conspiracy is Eddie did indeed do both, the afl investigated the gambling debt and recently mandated the value had to come from salary cap, hence the strange recent trade period. And the board have used this a leverage to get Eddie to leave.

no doubt my imagination is in overdrive and I’m 100% wrong. Just find it all odd.

Eddie tried to get Buckley his premiership by adding another player who had a baggage. This was Collingwood's "Fevola to Lions" moment, good to see he couldn't ride through it and had to take the fall.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I’m wading into conspiracy territory here but I still wonder about the rumours re Eddie pushing for beams and paying off gambling debts. Has anything about the validity of this been proven?

my conspiracy is Eddie did indeed do both, the afl investigated the gambling debt and recently mandated the value had to come from salary cap, hence the strange recent trade period. And the board have used this a leverage to get Eddie to leave.

no doubt my imagination is in overdrive and I’m 100% wrong. Just find it all odd.
On the podcast 'Sacked' (decent series) Beams stated none of the rumours were true or even close to true. Of course he would never say otherwise and based on his history he is probably not the most truthful person either. So who knows.
 
I’m wading into conspiracy territory here but I still wonder about the rumours re Eddie pushing for beams and paying off gambling debts. Has anything about the validity of this been proven?

my conspiracy is Eddie did indeed do both, the afl investigated the gambling debt and recently mandated the value had to come from salary cap, hence the strange recent trade period. And the board have used this a leverage to get Eddie to leave.

no doubt my imagination is in overdrive and I’m 100% wrong. Just find it all odd.
In what world do you think the AFL would keep something like that quiet.

If you’d suggested that a Collingwood coterie member or 2 was approached to help out beams then I could believe that is possible.
 
In what world do you think the AFL would keep something like that quiet.

If you’d suggested that a Collingwood coterie member or 2 was approached to help out beams then I could believe that is possible.
Waits for the book from Caro and Niall to come out in 10 odd years.

Twomey and his mates said on a recent podcast, that they only report about one quarter of the stories they hear from inside clubs.

The rest they don’t, because people won’t go on record, or it’s not worth losing their jobs.

We saw earlier in the season one of the AFL reporters, Mitch Cleary, get stood down for posting about Brook Cotchin breaking the hub rules, accompanied by her Instagram photo. Because the Cotchins and the AFL had made a deal to keep Brook out of the media, before the story actually broke.

Except the AFL forgot to tell their media arm what the rules were, regarding their reporting of the story.
 
Pretty obvious why this idiot wasn’t drafted


I’m all for forgiving a young man if he has made a poor choice, but this seems like a pattern of behaviour. Has blown too many chances now. Sad, because he was very entertaining to watch and had the skills to make it... just not the brains.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

Non-lions discussion 2020

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top