Sooner or later you're going to have to stop relying on one game in early 2008
Sooner or later Hawthorn are going to have to stop relying on one day in September 2008.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Sooner or later you're going to have to stop relying on one game in early 2008
Sooner or later Hawthorn are going to have to stop relying on one day in September 2008.
You have a point Timmy, but seeing as Collingwood keeps declaring itself to be some mega successful football club with one flag in 50 years ... I guess we keep bragging rights for six or seven decades at least. Yes ?
Fair point Johnny, but lets just keep it topical, hey? The past 50 years has zip to do with the topic.
And your previous post does ?
They are directly related to each other and intertwined with the coach. After a decade this is Malthouse’s list and it plays Malthouse’s game plan. It even gets Malthouse’s results – same year in year out.The gameplan is a symptom of the list, rather than a separate issue IMO.
You got that wrong. He doesn’t have to grow into a leadership role he has to get better at a position on the ground which I don’t think he will.Furthermore, the fact that Maxwell is your captain and needs to grow into a leadership role speaks volumes.
Firstly, I have been saying for quite a while that this list has the worst leadership credentialed players in my lifetime and that is a failing of the coach. As for captaincy options I would have gone for Heath Shaw until the episode last year and thereafter Travis Cloke. My preference is still Heath Shaw but political correctness will rule him out for some time to come. The other option I would consider is Dane Swan. That said, if Maxwell is an automatic selection then he is the best captain on the list ignoring football ability. I’d argue he isn’t a good enough footballer but he has been an automatic selection since his first year.... but what other real option was there ?) is tangible evidence of a leadership vacuum. This has been Malthouse's greatest failing.
Please dont misquote me.
They took a punt on somebody with the best leadership qualities despite his comparatively limited football ability. And he has made a couple of mistakes early in his tenure. That happens to a lot of players. I'd rather a leader fly the flag too much rather than not at all - eg Brent Harvey in the first three rounds of this year.
Maxwell will find the balance pretty soon. He's not stupid.
And your post previous to that does?
He better find some form 1st, before the suspension his form was woefull bar 1 3rd quarter purple patch.
The only thing saving him is who replaces him and the little (c) next to his name.
I'm not the one posting on topic.
They are directly related to each other and intertwined with the coach. After a decade this is Malthouse’s list and it plays Malthouse’s game plan. It even gets Malthouse’s results – same year in year out.
You got that wrong. He doesn’t have to grow into a leadership role he has to get better at a position on the ground which I don’t think he will.
Firstly, I have been saying for quite a while that this list has the worst leadership credentialed players in my lifetime and that is a failing of the coach.
As for captaincy options I would have gone for Heath Shaw until the episode last year and thereafter Travis Cloke. My preference is still Heath Shaw but political correctness will rule him out for some time to come.
The other option I would consider is Dane Swan.
That said, if Maxwell is an automatic selection then he is the best captain on the list ignoring football ability. I’d argue he isn’t a good enough footballer but he has been an automatic selection since his first year.
As for Malthouse’s greatest failing it is pretty basic. He is not a good enough judge of horseflesh. It is evidenced in the early drafting he played a big part in and the trading over the decade.
I can't believe some of the supporters on here!!
But for TWO straight kicks, across only TWO games(Round 1 & Round 5), we'd be 4 - 1!! But some people think it's all over already!! We were 9th after 5 rounds last year with the same win/loss record.
Hold off doomsayers!!
Shaw wasn’t considered mad won’t be. Swan has a prior when he was quite a bit younger. Personally I think football club captains can be a bit wild off the field and still be great club captains. Players that played under Carey would testify to that.Another tip-rat isn't he ?
Same excuse from every supporter defending every coach at every club. Malthouse directed the types we looked for in his early days. I base that on recruiting v his comments on players types and on Neil Balme saying as much a few times in the early years. I reckon he’s had less say at the draft table thank Christ but he is still in charge of who gets cut and who get traded in and out.You're pretty much on your own there Mark. I'm not saying you're wrong, far from it, but every time I say the same thing I'm informed that Mick is not responsible for recruiting so that failing is someone else's fault.
Sooner or later Hawthorn are going to have to stop relying on one day in September 2008.
The gameplan is a symptom of the list, rather than a separate issue IMO.
Wrong. [snipped]
So you reckon it's a coincidence that your only potential game breakers are flankers/pockets and your gameplan hugs the boundary ?
Fair enough.
So you reckon it's a coincidence that your only potential game breakers are flankers/pockets and your gameplan hugs the boundary ?
Fair enough.
Anthony and Cloke are also potential game breakers as is Rocca as a proven one, albeit at the end of his career. But the gameplan does them a massive dis-service.
Back on topic
For North, its not a season defining match, win or lose
For Collingwood, its not a season defining match if they win.
BUT IF COLLINGWOOD LOSE...............
Oh boy.