- Apr 26, 2011
- 11,085
- 13,735
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Wimbledon AFC
You can't talk rationally with VictoriansLol.
How can you have a bye before the comp starts for your team?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can't talk rationally with VictoriansLol.
How can you have a bye before the comp starts for your team?
It’s still the late 90’s in WA20% of your membership base is in WA? I call bullshit.
First of all I am WA born and bred.You can't talk rationally with Victorians
If North want to do this then let them go for it. I would imagine it is a strategy that they would only want to employ while they are down the bottom though, particularly if they were rising at the same time as one or both of the WA clubs. They'd hate to miss top 4/ top 8/ home final because they lost a close game to Fremantle played in WA, which they may otherwise have won at Docklands.
It would also be a good way for the WA sides to have an extended stay at home mid-season.
For example:
Freo play away in the eastern states
Freo play WCE away (7 days at home)
Freo play at home (14)
Freo play NM "away" in Perth (21)
Freo get the bye (28)
Freo play Bris at home (35)
Freo travel east (+/-42)
Of course that would need the AFL on-board to fixture. Using the bye round and the local derby it could possibly be worked that WCE get +/- 4 or 5 weeks without travel as well.
The following season they flip it so WCE have the longer stay at home.
Is that really so different than the feeling of fans who see a team in the top 8 that had double ups against Richmond, WC, and North whilst their team had double ups against Brisbane, Sydney, and Geelong?Why would the AFL schedule a bottom 4 team to play a home game in WA against a top 4 team in 2025?
How would the side who missed the top 8 feel if Freo pipped them by a win or percentage? Fans would be seriously pissed off and fair enough.
It's fine if the additional home game doesn't gift a contending side or side who are just make the top 8 by getti g a win against a bottom 4 side.
Pretty sure that's why it was knocked back years ago when the Eagles were contending g.
Do you think 1 game for 1 of the 2 teams would have a significant impact with that though? I might be wrong but I'd be more inclined to think having road trips for WA clubs to play several games away, and on the flipside having a decent stretch of home games together, like the NBA might be beneficial but equally that mightn't work because of the time between games.
I appreciate what this would do for both North (financially, not for on field results) and their opponent, and understand that there are some inherent disadvantages which can't really be solved organically, but the fixture (like the draft) is such a mess already so I'm not a fan at all of adding even more quirks to it - rather I think they should be removing them where they can.
I think a better way to manage WA. sides is for both to play away in zero round in Brisbane and Sydney and to have a bye around round six. It would give them two byes during the year rather than start the year a week later.If North want to do this then let them go for it. I would imagine it is a strategy that they would only want to employ while they are down the bottom though, particularly if they were rising at the same time as one or both of the WA clubs. They'd hate to miss top 4/ top 8/ home final because they lost a close game to Fremantle played in WA, which they may otherwise have won at Docklands.
It would also be a good way for the WA sides to have an extended stay at home mid-season.
For example:
Freo play away in the eastern states
Freo play WCE away (7 days at home)
Freo play at home (14)
Freo play NM "away" in Perth (21)
Freo get the bye (28)
Freo play Bris at home (35)
Freo travel east (+/-42)
Of course that would need the AFL on-board to fixture. Using the bye round and the local derby it could possibly be worked that WCE get +/- 4 or 5 weeks without travel as well.
The following season they flip it so WCE have the longer stay at home.
If one of Freo or West Coast gets one extra week at home - omigawshsounfairthe world is fallingdown.
Anyone dares to suggest that Collingwood, Carlton or Essendon have to travel to Tasmania for a game and the land arises with outrage. Indeed even travelling to far away Manuka is too much to demand of them!! Since 2001 the pies have played once at Manuka, and Essendon and Carlton haven't had to worry about regular season games here at all. Ever.
Some great research a while back by the mob at the ARC shows the basic concept -
https://thearcfooty.com/2016/08/28/...ther-than-any-other-player-in-aflvfl-history/
View attachment 2151810
In rough terms - by the end of his career - Pav had travelled enough to do 21 complete laps of the globe at the equator - or go to the moon and back twice and get nearly halfway there again.
View attachment 2151811
And others have added on:
So one extra game at home for the WA teams (who don't get opening round, gather round or any other bloody round) somehow destroys the comp???
North beat west coast at Optus last year.Is this ‘a form of tanking’? If North want to make any money in Perth they will need to play WC. And North would be favourites against WC at Marvel or Hobart, but underdogs at Optus. This is a strange move. Equally idiotic as Hawthorn hosting Tasmania in Tasmania!
If North want to sell a home game to WA, does it have to be in Perth? Maybe the game should be in country WA somewhere, would at least bring a degree of neutrality to the equation.
They are doing it for the money. 40k @ Optus > 5k in a regional venue.If North want to sell a home game to WA, does it have to be in Perth? Maybe the game should be in country WA somewhere, would at least bring a degree of neutrality to the equation.
Are you saying that you are. Ore chance of winning in Perth?North beat west coast at Optus last year.
I would assume some of the appeal for selling a game to WA is the ticket sales at Optus.
North aren't going to sell 40k tickets at Geraldton or Bunbury.
One would assume that governments would be chipping in to promote development/tourism in the SW government, but they wouldn't be chipping in to buy the North game any more than the fact that more tickets will be sold in total than a Hobart game, with that money being split between North and the local stadium.They are doing it for the money. 40k @ Optus > 5k in a regional venue.
I'm saying if you were tanking a game you probably wouldn't take it to a place where you have a better recent record than your own home ground.Are you saying that you are. Ore chance of winning in Perth?
Then whats the point? Who exactly is paying North and Gold Coast to play in WA?North should be allowed to do this providing the opposition team isn't West Coast or Fremantle. Let them play Gold Coast in Perth instead of Hobart if they want.
It’s just so obvious…. the rootin tootin Sainteroo’s
19 team comps gunna be diabolical
Red , blue black and white jumpers will look sweet
Kangaroo with a halo as the mascot
See how many ‘ I’ll burn myself in the street if this happens “ types stay away if they win a flag or 2 early on
Sainteroo’s get the cream of the lists but Tassie also gets a nice bundle of depth to help them not be crap from the get go
On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app