There is..it’s called the outer east. But they’re rooted with the way they are structured. It’s been no good for the traditional mountain district clubs, having the likes of narre come in and lay waste to this league..but footy vic couldn’t give a rats!It’s a lot harder to retain players when you’re not in the top division (or have a realistic shot of getting there soon). You’re not allowed to pay as much money for starters and your really talented players who try VFL get taken away because VFL clubs insist they have to play in higher divisions.
Where this is hard is with the league so big, it’s getting very hard for clubs to get there and give their players hope. Of course it’s not the reality - most D1 (even D2) clubs in the EFL would easily compete with top tier clubs in other leagues, but that label of the “top division” goes a long way.
It’s a reality clubs have to deal with and with everything else going on re retaining players, it’s another big issue.
EFNL 48 clubs
SFNL 36
NFNL 28
EDFL 29
WRFL 25
I think with the season length we have most people argue 10 clubs to a division is ideal, those numbers say that there’s 16/17 divisions across the city, yet maybe the balance is off if one league has five. Interesting that the two leagues south of the Yarra have more clubs than the three leagues in the north / west.
Anyway, rambling, point is perhaps the EFL is now simply too big which is what causes these issues and frustration among clubs. Maybe there’s an argument that there should be three leagues across the EFNL / SFNL area.
This I would say is something clubs should have been more awake to when admitting new clubs, Bobby’s point above about Berwick is very interesting and valid.