Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Absolute bargain!Courier Mail reporting that Mac Andrew has re-signed with Gold Coast. Six years with a trigger for four more. The biggest deal in AFL history.
Same.Apart from Taberner, I've never heard of these guys.
me neitherApart from Taberner, I've never heard of these guys.
The only saving grace is that it has a trigger clause, so if career trajectory doesn’t go as planned at least there’s some sort of fail-safe. I’d be interested to know what the triggers are though.I reckon GC have just cursed Mac’s career. That deal is crazy.
How long into the deal does he get home sick and requests a trade back to Vic? these deals are getting out of hand.The only saving grace is that it has a trigger clause, so if career trajectory doesn’t go as planned at least there’s some sort of fail-safe. I’d be interested to know what the triggers are though.
There is one other saving grace - he was on Melbourne's NGA list, and they missed out!The only saving grace is that it has a trigger clause, so if career trajectory doesn’t go as planned at least there’s some sort of fail-safe. I’d be interested to know what the triggers are though.
Right? Like, in isolation if everything goes to plan, he becomes a premier KPP of the comp and he wants to stay at GC for his whole career, then Scodog10 probably ends up being correct and it’s a bargain. But there are so many variables. What happens if he hits his triggers but in year 6 gets an injury that hampers him for the next 4? What if he gets Lynch hamstrings during that period? What if he decides he wants to come back to vic in a few years but nobody believes he’s worth that contract anymore? Suddenly GC are in a Grundy situation where they have to pay a chunk of that massive salary for nearly a decade?How long into the deal does he get home sick and requests a trade back to Vic? these deals are getting out of hand.
The only saving grace is that it has a trigger clause, so if career trajectory doesn’t go as planned at least there’s some sort of fail-safe. I’d be interested to know what the triggers are though.
Still gotta make the GF uninjuredInjury Footy God's work in Tay's favour for a change.
I’m not agreeing nor disagreeing with your post here just offering some context to my own.Right? Like, in isolation if everything goes to plan, he becomes a premier KPP of the comp and he wants to stay at GC for his whole career, then Scodog10 probably ends up being correct and it’s a bargain. But there are so many variables. What happens if he hits his triggers but in year 6 gets an injury that hampers him for the next 4? What if he gets Lynch hamstrings during that period? What if he decides he wants to come back to vic in a few years but nobody believes he’s worth that contract anymore? Suddenly GC are in a Grundy situation where they have to pay a chunk of that massive salary for nearly a decade?
Those kind of contracts scare the shit out of me, and they did even before we gave Grundy his.
Still got to make the GF. I'm sure someone thinks they're a sure thing to beat them after they bypass Port this weekStill gotta make the GF uninjured
According to Tom Morris, it's games played.The only saving grace is that it has a trigger clause, so if career trajectory doesn’t go as planned at least there’s some sort of fail-safe. I’d be interested to know what the triggers are though.
Just to add to my previous reply, if he plays 60 games between 2026 and 2030 it triggers the remaining four years.The only saving grace is that it has a trigger clause, so if career trajectory doesn’t go as planned at least there’s some sort of fail-safe. I’d be interested to know what the triggers are though.
Even knowing what we now know I’d say that sort of contract would absolutely not have been reasonable for Moore. Even without his injury history.I’m not agreeing nor disagreeing with your post here just offering some context to my own.
Knowing what we now do does 9 years at $12m signed back in 2017 seem reasonable for Moore? We’re talking about a guy that’s shown roughly the same, but without the injury profile Moore had across his first 3 seasons. That contract would have seemed mad back in 2017 $’s, but would now be when it actually kicks into gear when $1m is par for the course for that type of player. The equivalent in 2024 $’s is closer to $18m over the life of the deal Andrew has signed.
The biggest flaw in it is going to be 2-3 years from now when he’s on $600-800k and there’s offers coming thick and fast at $1.5-2m pa. What it highlights to me is the need to find a couple of elite talls to come through our system because we’ve got Naicos through to the end of the decade on give or take $1m a year. How do you go out big game hunting when you’ve got the best player in the game taking unders? We can hardly throw $1.5m at JUH next time he’s off contract after what he dished up on Friday night, but that’s what it’ll take to dislodge him…
You need a top drawer FD to attract talent within a defined pay structure. We currently don’t have that efficient FD which is why the draft should be our focus, IMO.
Just to add to my previous reply, if he plays 60 games between 2026 and 2030 it triggers the remaining four years.
It’s seems a tad high.World has gone mad. 41 games and 9 goals gets you 12M.
So the Suns need to clear some cap space - we can help!World has gone mad. 41 games and 9 goals gets you 12M.
The deal doesn't even kick in until 2026, so they have time.So the Suns need to clear some cap space - we can help!
Withe the right first round draft pick incentive.
And we’ve come full circle back to lukosiusSo the Suns need to clear some cap space - we can help!
Withe the right first round draft pick incentive.
Salary dump time, because he'll still be getting $1M in 2026 when Andrew's new deal kicks in.And we’ve come full circle back to lukosius