Re: Peter Rohde on 3aw NOW
We have all the deals done so far in this trade week.
Jolly wanted out, pick 14 and 46. Done.
Josh Gibson wanted out + pick 69 for pick 25 and 41. Done within a couple of hours into trade week.
Andrew Lovett wanted out, pick 16. Done.
Problem is Burgs nominated the Hawks and Port are trying to deny him that wish. Best thing Burgs could have done was a smoky I want to go to Melbourne and then Port would have been bitches to them as Melbourne probably would want to keep their first round pick/s and Hawks' pick 9 would have looked like gold.
The more players denied their preferred destination the more chance Free Agency is brought in. If it is PA will be punished because Mark Williams is a dick and players will all of a sudden have a lot more power.
history of trading 'high profile' (or at the very least, good to very good) players:
Cummings for Schofield - fair trade all round
The Eagleton/Montgomery complex trade - fair trade all round
Wakelin for pick 4 - fair trade (over the odds actually)
Two picks for Pickett - not sure how Pickett wasnt 'high profile'
Two picks for Hardwick - again, was AA 12 months prior to the trade, very fair
Carr for three picks - We played hard ball a bit here and Freo came to the table.
You dont have a leg to stand on in this argument. All you have is Nick Stevens....And why did that deal not go through? Maybe because Collingwood offered us used tampons thanks to Nicks **** of a manager changing the rules at the 11th hour? Would you have accepted Mcgough (who was delisted 12 months later) and pick 35, which was their final offer? Most on this board have said they wouldnt even do Burgoyne for Lewis (a Stevens equivalent in age etc. just for arguments sake) in a straight swap....imagine us offering you Logan and pick 40 for him. Would you take it? Or would you tell us to **** off and tell him to have fun collecting wooden spoons?
Weve done our very best to accomodate players that have asked to be traded - Symes, Thomson, Morgan, Guerra, M Stevens, Pickett, Carr and N Stevens have all asked to be traded to either go home or for more opportunity elsewhere. Only the Nick trade hasnt gone through.
Its a different situation (so far) on two paths anyway. First off Burgoyne hasnt done the dirty like Nick did. Second of all at least you have come to the party and put a good pick on the table. You cant blame Port for asking/wanting a first 22 player to replace one of our top 2-3 players. Guys like Tuck etc. would be only negligible in our first 22 anyway.
Id be happy if I had any say in it to accept pick 9 and Thorp (I can understand why Port dont want him), Dowler (apparently he has not been offered) or Kennedy. Tuck & Mcglynn not so much.
We have all the deals done so far in this trade week.
Jolly wanted out, pick 14 and 46. Done.
Josh Gibson wanted out + pick 69 for pick 25 and 41. Done within a couple of hours into trade week.
Andrew Lovett wanted out, pick 16. Done.
Problem is Burgs nominated the Hawks and Port are trying to deny him that wish. Best thing Burgs could have done was a smoky I want to go to Melbourne and then Port would have been bitches to them as Melbourne probably would want to keep their first round pick/s and Hawks' pick 9 would have looked like gold.
The more players denied their preferred destination the more chance Free Agency is brought in. If it is PA will be punished because Mark Williams is a dick and players will all of a sudden have a lot more power.