Player Watch Pick #5 (2006) - Travis Boak

Remove this Banner Ad

People are making it sound like Boak is a 371 game version of Willem Drew. He's a 3 x All Australian as a midfielder (very difficult to do), 2 x B&F (4 x runner up) and runner up in a Brownlow. In his prime, he was a gun footballer. He's now past his prime but is still a solid player at 36, which is almost an achievement in itself.
That was all a long time ago in a galaxy far away.
 
I'm not as against the sentiment as some from a bigger picture perspective but I'll still never understand why the club think this is the sort of thing they should publish to the fans. The only investment fans have in the club and players is what they do on the field and ultimately winning on the field. It's bizarre to be telling the fans that what you do on the field is a secondary concern.

My other concern is that someone like Boak is undoubtedly a good person but then the system will also spit out an entitled man child flog like Houston and call him a good person. It's a bit of a warped bubble like that.
I would have got rid of Boak at the end of 2023 & that statement is why. Can't have club leaders with that sentiment & expect to be successful. Do we hear this crap from other clubs, it's so nauseating.

Tell me you want to win so badly every time you take the field. Tell me how important it is to win a flag & you will drag your team-mates with you to achieve this. Tell me you bleed for PA. DON'T tell me you want to be a great person coz I don't give a shit.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Being a good person is obviously important in all walks of life but when you are a professional footballer surely the legacy you want to leave behind is your footballing achievements.

And at the end of the day we all help pay these guys wages and none of us really care about how good of a bloke you are, we care about winning games of footy.

A team of shit blokes that could take us to a flag v a team of nice guys that never get you there? I know what I’m taking.

We are leaning far too much on this nice guys stuff.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

'St Kilda qualified for the 1997 AFL grand final after wins in the qualifying and preliminary finals. Harvey played in the grand final in which St Kilda was defeated by 31 points.'

'Port Adelaide qualified for the 2007 AFL grand final after wins in the qualifying and preliminary finals. Boak played in the grand final in which Port Adelaide was defeated by 119 points.'
 
A couple of winning 'jerks' would be nice in the team at the moment.

No one cares about your personality, just your footballing. I haven't thought one bit about McKenzie or Dixon since they retired.

There is nothing wrong with helping the community but it should be a strong second to winning.

You have to balance being nice with the reality of the situation.

We've just got a Chairman that is all about image and franchising us and an incompetent coach who will hang on to dear life for his job and anyone who rocks the boat is shafted out.
 
Off the top of my head the most runs in an Ashes series since Bradman, captained the first side to win in the West Indies for a gazillion years, 334 NO, umpteen series wins as skipper etc. it's a pretty daft comparison.
Like I mentioned both have had a great sporting careers.
Tubs never won a or was part of a World Cup side though. That was more my point.
As for winning the Ashes, that’s the equivalent of playing a Showdown. Apart from AUS & ENG no one gives a toss :)
 
Like I mentioned both have had a great sporting careers.
Tubs never won a or was part of a World Cup side though. That was more my point.
As for winning the Ashes, that’s the equivalent of playing a Showdown. Apart from AUS & ENG no one gives a toss :)
Taylor was not suited to one day cricket and IIRC, the team toured South Africa and won the Test Series but lost the one dayers and he said that their priority was to win the Test Series and not the one dayers and after that he didn't play or captain in the one dayers much after that and it was around that time when both of those teams became more specialised instead of the teams being the same players.
 
Like I mentioned both have had a great sporting careers.
Tubs never won a or was part of a World Cup side though. That was more my point.
As for winning the Ashes, that’s the equivalent of playing a Showdown. Apart from AUS & ENG no one gives a toss :)
He was captain of the World Cup side that lost the final to Sri Lanka in 1996 and you are talking eras ago when ODI's were barely rated above hit and giggle by purists. Test Cricket is the highest scale & his achievements are plentiful on the international stage as opposed to a niche sport no one outside Australia gives a shit about.

Don't die on this hill bro.
 
Boak isn't a calorie in Tubby Tubes diet he was probably greatest ever Australian test captain with a ton of achievements.. jeezus.
I believe in a test in Pakistan Mark Taylor also refused to surpass Don Bradman's Australian test record score of 334, which he had scored in his first test in England.

Taylor had been dropped twice before he had scored 25, reached 334 due to a very basic mis-field on the last ball of the day and declared the next morning saying something along the lines of his innings not belonging in the same category as that of Bradman, and winning the test was more important than chasing individual records.

No such problem for Matthew Hayden though, when he surpassed Bradman's test record score against a very ordinary Zimbabwe attack in Perth in 2003.
 
Like I mentioned both have had a great sporting careers.
Tubs never won a or was part of a World Cup side though. That was more my point.
As for winning the Ashes, that’s the equivalent of playing a Showdown. Apart from AUS & ENG no one gives a toss :)
Dude you've made one of the shittest comparisons of all time. Just own it, admit you made a dumb call and move on.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch Pick #5 (2006) - Travis Boak

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top