Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A sizeable amount of posters disagreeNo-one wanted Butch to be in the AFL side this year till he had done a lot in the SANFL so what's different with Harvey?
I take it you have sometimes had opinions that most people disagree with. The point of a forum is to compare opinions, not just go along with the popular opinion.A sizeable amount of posters disagree
I was objecting to you saying 'No-one wanted Butch to be in the AFL side this year till he had done a lot in the SANFL' when that's not true, plenty of us believe that the expectation on Butcher's performance in the SANFL is too high.I take it you have sometimes had opinions that most people disagree with. The point of a forum is to compare opinions, not just go along with the popular opinion.
No-one wanted Butch to be in the AFL side this year till he had done a lot in the SANFL so what's different with Harvey? He's just come back and he doesn't really have any form demanding inclusion. Although I was even more surprised to see Jesse Palmer named, if only as an emergency.
The Roos have Ben Brown from the same draft in their team, in fact he started in 2014 but he looks much more imposing on the field.
I have heard on the grapevine via connections to Harvey - not Port - that the coaching group believe Harvey is AFL ready but politics and sensitivities have prevented him being picked.
Now we cant make finals there are no more excuses. If someone's nose is put out of joint then bad luck. Harvey is our 10 year future not 2015 rest of season or 2016 future like others. Pick him.
Too cryptic for me.I have heard on the grapevine via connections to Harvey - not Port - that the coaching group believe Harvey is AFL ready but politics and sensitivities have prevented him being picked.
Now we cant make finals there are no more excuses. If someone's nose is put out of joint then bad luck. Harvey is our 10 year future not 2015 rest of season or 2016 future like others. Pick him.
I have heard on the grapevine via connections to Harvey - not Port - that the coaching group believe Harvey is AFL ready but politics and sensitivities have prevented him being picked.
Now we cant make finals there are no more excuses. If someone's nose is put out of joint then bad luck. Harvey is our 10 year future not 2015 rest of season or 2016 future like others. Pick him.
I have heard on the grapevine via connections to Harvey - not Port - that the coaching group believe Harvey is AFL ready but politics and sensitivities have prevented him being picked.
Now we cant make finals there are no more excuses. If someone's nose is put out of joint then bad luck. Harvey is our 10 year future not 2015 rest of season or 2016 future like others. Pick him.
Shame he couldn't get near it today in a 10 goal win against a bottom team.
Would have been great if he got a few goals and some hitouts.
I am tearing my hair out at this.I have heard on the grapevine via connections to Harvey - not Port - that the coaching group believe Harvey is AFL ready but politics and sensitivities have prevented him being picked.
Now we cant make finals there are no more excuses. If someone's nose is put out of joint then bad luck. Harvey is our 10 year future not 2015 rest of season or 2016 future like others. Pick him.
I have heard on the grapevine via connections to Harvey - not Port - that the coaching group believe Harvey is AFL ready but politics and sensitivities have prevented him being picked.
Now we cant make finals there are no more excuses. If someone's nose is put out of joint then bad luck. Harvey is our 10 year future not 2015 rest of season or 2016 future like others. Pick him.
We're either being weak on another player by not giving Harvey a go due to "politics", or we're weak on Harvey by lying to him.What possible 'politics' could be involved? Pretty obvious IMO that they aren't convinced at all with his fitness.
What? Another shit draft pick. Judging by everyone's comments, we have had two good draft selections in the last 5 years, wines and wingard, ant that was luck. Sack our scouts.Wow, interesting.
I've heard the complete opposite.
I've been told they don't rate him, they don't think he will make it as an AFL player and that's the reason he hasn't been given games as yet.
Nothing to do with fitness or structures, just plain talent. To be fair, nothing I have ever seen from him says AFL footballer to me either. So who knows.
Be interesting to see what happens these next few weeks.
The same coaching panel that has given a slew of games to Gray, Mitchell and Stewart over the past 2 years.Wow, interesting.
I've heard the complete opposite.
I've been told they don't rate him, they don't think he will make it as an AFL player and that's the reason he hasn't been given games as yet.
Nothing to do with fitness or structures, just plain talent. To be fair, nothing I have ever seen from him says AFL footballer to me either. So who knows.
Be interesting to see what happens these next few weeks.
Heavily marked by more than one defender all day and played very deep in the forward lines. North flooded fairly well and quick. Most of our damage was done around the 40 to 50m line. Butcher played well at chb but was moved next to Harvey and had lesser impact so it had a lot to do with North's defensive bottling of space.
When i heard politics - first thought that popped into my head was not wanting to drop/rest Shulz knowing his contract status. Second was Paul Stuart selection when Ryder was injured due to his contract status. Hope it is niether of these.
What possible 'politics' could be involved? Pretty obvious IMO that they aren't convinced at all with his fitness.